Skip to comments.
Supreme Court to Consider Whether Police Ignorance of the Law Justifies Stop
aclu ^
| 10-2-2014
Posted on 10/03/2014 10:53:01 AM PDT by Citizen Zed
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: WayneS
It is legal to operate a car with only one working taillight in that state however if the car has another taillight fixture and it is not working then there is a violation.
21
posted on
10/03/2014 8:40:10 PM PDT
by
B4Ranch
(Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
To: Citizen Zed
In 0bama’s Communist Amerika, ignorance=reason.
22
posted on
10/04/2014 7:11:34 AM PDT
by
Rodamala
To: Citizen Zed; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...
![](http://www.supremecourt.gov/images/banner_seal2.gif)
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
23
posted on
10/05/2014 1:55:40 PM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: B4Ranch
Interesting.
It is possible, then, that the stop was perfectly legal, but that a defense attorney was able to throw enough talcum powder in to the fan to cloud the issue.
Unless we know what kind of car he was driving we don’t know for SURE, but... interesting.
24
posted on
10/06/2014 7:29:27 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson