Skip to comments.
Washington Redskins hold press conference to reveal their name change
Unknown ^
| 9/29/14
Posted on 09/29/2014 6:09:46 PM PDT by yorkie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
To: AFreeBird; anton
Since almost everyone in the stands at Redskins’ home games lives off the rest of us, I suggest the Washington Tapeworms.
61
posted on
09/29/2014 10:04:49 PM PDT
by
Pining_4_TX
(All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
To: 88keys
BIG SMILE - that is exactly what I had hoped, 88keys!
62
posted on
09/29/2014 10:06:22 PM PDT
by
yorkie
To: yorkie
Looks like the ‘yeas’ have this one, yorkie! *hugs*
63
posted on
09/29/2014 10:14:51 PM PDT
by
oldteen
To: yorkie
64
posted on
09/30/2014 4:54:50 AM PDT
by
MEG33
(Thank You To All Who Serve Our Country)
To: lonestar
People who are confused about satire resent those who "get it."They are boring and dumb.
I resent that!!
To: Fightin Whitey
They are boring and dumb. I resent that!!
If you're serious...the shoe fits.
Here's a Kleenex...boring, whiney crybaby.
66
posted on
09/30/2014 5:48:44 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
To: lonestar
If you’re serious, you’re an idiot.
Ever hear of satire? Now’s a good time to study up.
To: Fightin Whitey
Ever hear of satire? Nows a good time to study up Well....well...well!
You should take your own advice.
68
posted on
09/30/2014 6:04:16 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
To: lonestar
Well....well...well! Cutting edge wit.
You ought to take your act on the road.
To: Fightin Whitey
70
posted on
09/30/2014 6:19:28 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
To: yorkie
Yorkie, the comments that may appear to be insulting/whining about your posted thread joke are actually about a new FR policy whereby satire now has to be marked clearly in the headline as satire. Thereby the entire value of the satire is lost. It’s been a bit controversial over the past few days. They’re not attacks on your humorous post. Sorry, I don’t have the link to the thread announcing the new policy and am terrible at searches.
71
posted on
09/30/2014 7:13:08 AM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: Starstruck
You didnt read the new satire rules. We have been getting confused about satire.Have they been posted?
72
posted on
10/01/2014 8:52:56 AM PDT
by
houeto
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
To: EagleUSA
73
posted on
10/01/2014 8:56:21 AM PDT
by
houeto
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
To: houeto
74
posted on
10/01/2014 8:57:37 AM PDT
by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Starstruck
Got it, thanks. Just damn! That takes all the wind out of good satire’s sails. What a shame. I thought that’s what keywords are for. Some of my best FR laughs have come at the expense of those that fall for it even though it was tagged as satire in the keywords.
75
posted on
10/01/2014 9:11:27 AM PDT
by
houeto
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson