Isn't that cute?
"The Responsible Body Armor Possession Act"
When he really means "The Body Armor Non-Possession Act."
1 posted on
08/22/2014 8:54:35 AM PDT by
servo1969
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: servo1969
34 posted on
08/22/2014 10:17:53 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: servo1969
Interesting that when politicians name bills, the names are always the exact opposite of what the bills actually do.
35 posted on
08/22/2014 10:20:04 AM PDT by
Fido969
(What's sad is most)
To: servo1969
Mike Honda (D)...determined to do for body armor sales what Obama did for gun sales....
The body armor manufacturers association of America thanks you Mr. Honda!
36 posted on
08/22/2014 10:22:06 AM PDT by
apillar
To: servo1969
"The Responsible Body Armor Possession Act" Well, then why in the heck does the government give automatic weapons and military vehicles to LEO departments?
41 posted on
08/22/2014 11:47:23 AM PDT by
Arrowhead1952
(Guns are like parachutes. If you need one and don't have one, you'll probably never need one again.)
To: servo1969
That’s just not fair! I have been saving all my money so I could order a suit from Tony Stark.
42 posted on
08/22/2014 12:01:19 PM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: servo1969
Honda’s bill, H.R. 5344, The Responsible Body Armor Possession Act... Apparently, the "responsible" thing to do is to remain in a state where they can turn you into swiss cheese, where the wolves can control the sheep easily.
46 posted on
08/22/2014 9:33:36 PM PDT by
Lexinom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson