Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: TheProducer
Absolutely. Sometimes you get what you ask for.
2 posted on
04/02/2014 4:08:30 PM PDT by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: TheProducer
Is this a trick question?
HELL NO!!!
3 posted on
04/02/2014 4:08:35 PM PDT by
Night Hides Not
(For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
To: TheProducer
...in Israel, one woman saved the life of a fellow soldier by crafting a tourniquet out of her braWell, if that isn't the best justification I've ever heard for women in front-line combat positions, I don't know what is. That certainly overcomes all of my objections.
To: TheProducer
So should women be serving in combat?
Well its a good idea, maybe, on paper...butI think they would have a hard time carrying those trays with beer and sandwiches...
6 posted on
04/02/2014 4:10:35 PM PDT by
Adder
(No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
To: TheProducer
yeah women and children front and center, what an effing travesty, that is depraved
7 posted on
04/02/2014 4:12:06 PM PDT by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: TheProducer
8 posted on
04/02/2014 4:12:13 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: TheProducer
Moot point because they’re going there anyway. Might as well since we’re already in the midst of collapse.
To: TheProducer
my first impulse was to say NO!....but as I thought about the issue, I realized that if women are foregoing motherhood then women are just another human person, and they bleed like men.....
10 posted on
04/02/2014 4:14:42 PM PDT by
B212
To: TheProducer
It's too bad that we can't enlist wymyn like Janet Reno to go against America's enemies.
11 posted on
04/02/2014 4:14:48 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: TheProducer
feh...
12 posted on
04/02/2014 4:15:55 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
To: TheProducer
Damned straight they should be serving.
Serve me a beer. Get me a couple hamburgers.
Hey, massage my back and calves.
13 posted on
04/02/2014 4:16:08 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: TheProducer
Considering that armed conflict was one of mankind’s earliest creations and has been practiced continuously by all cultures for millenia, and considering that it is the one endeavor where it is literally a case of victory or death, I would say the fact that armed combat is historically the exclusive province of men pretty much settles the issue. If women were effective in combat they would already be doing it and we wouldn’t be asking this stupid question.
14 posted on
04/02/2014 4:16:36 PM PDT by
henkster
(I don't like bossy women telling me what words I can't use.)
To: TheProducer
FNG
nOOb....
Welcome to FR?
15 posted on
04/02/2014 4:17:18 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: TheProducer
No. And while we’re at it any job like fireman or fireman where the physical requirements were ‘dumbed down’. In all cases if they can perform the original physical requirements I’m good with them be alowed to work those jobs.
16 posted on
04/02/2014 4:18:08 PM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: TheProducer
CORRECTED No. And while we're at it any job like fireman or police officer where the physical requirements were 'dumbed down'. In all cases if they can perform the original physical requirements I'm good with them be alowed to work those jobs.
18 posted on
04/02/2014 4:19:53 PM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: TheProducer
They can stop lead just the same.
19 posted on
04/02/2014 4:20:20 PM PDT by
shankbear
(The tree of Liberty appears to be perishing because there are few patriots willing to refresh it.)
To: TheProducer
Only if it is a matter of survival. Otherwise, it is the sign of degenerate, spent culture and polity that deserves to die.
20 posted on
04/02/2014 4:21:23 PM PDT by
Psalm 144
(FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
To: TheProducer
We're asking the wrong question.
The question we should be asking:
How would we feel if a hostile nation's military announced that it was now embracing the "fair" concept of including women "soldiers" in front-line battle, not to mention the maritime equivalent of making it a point to have women serving alongside men in their nation's submarines and navy ships?
Would we worry because that enemy was all the sundden a stronger opponent?
Or would be be celebrating at the prospect of only having to face a weakened force?
THAT is the only question we should be asking, because as sure as water is wet, "democratically" weaving girls/women into the human-natural all-male defense fabric, is military sabotage, intended or unintended.
21 posted on
04/02/2014 4:22:21 PM PDT by
Finny
(Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
To: TheProducer
Welllllll lets have them start by defending a ship at say USS Mahan late Monday night at a Naval Station...say at night in Norfolk harbor and see how well they do. Give them a sidearm and have them stand post. If they can master weapon retention and closed quarter combat....
oh that’s right, she got disarmed and a MAN got killed defending her. Maybe have two women man the post with sidearms.....maybe three?
24 posted on
04/02/2014 4:32:07 PM PDT by
Dick Vomer
(democrats are like flies, whatever they don't eat they sh#t on.)
To: TheProducer
How can you tell its a woman anymore? May be transgender? Anyway if Gay guys can be there why not girls, and gay girls too.
Heck anyone that wants to fight for ObamaLand... be my guest.
25 posted on
04/02/2014 4:48:54 PM PDT by
Breto
(Stranger in a strange land... where did America go?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson