Posted on 12/13/2013 1:00:32 PM PST by Kevmo
That doesn't prove we got "nothing". That's your claim, so that's your burden.
Yes, it is proof. You got nothing. No hot-fusion cars, no hot-fusion water heaters, no hot-fusion electricity generators. Proof.
Hot fusion gives us the same as cold fusion here. But there have been $hundreds of Billions spent on hot fusion, and only tens of $millions on cold fusion. If cold fusion had 2-3 % of that budget, we’d have cold fusion cars by now.
Then your standard of proof makes everything you say suspect.
It’s the same standard the skeptopaths use. What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Or are you arguing that there should be 2 separate standards? It wouldn’t surprise me.
You've accused me of being a "skeptopath" and I've never used that standard, so you've already belied your own argument.
Okay, then for you, here’s the 14 order of magnitude difference in bang4thebuck between cold fusion and hot fusion:
-———————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg85822.html——————————
14 ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE! Here’s an illustration: It’s like you’re saying a flea that weighs 1 gram can knock over a healthy elephant that weighs 10,000kilograms. That would be 7 orders of magnitude. So what you’re really saying is that the flea could knock the earth, Venus, Mars, and Neptune off their orbits due to normal kinetic energy. That’s how much of a difference it is. So, well, maybe I exaggerate “just a little” when I say that the flea is nothing and there ain’t no poskibility that it could knock over 4 planets. That’s what 14 orders of magnitude look like. Good luck with your supposedly non-skeptopathic standard.
14 orders of magnitude of exactly what?
Read it. None of this PTSIFOM garbage.
All you know is "14 orders of magnitude", and don't even know what's being measured?
You didn’t read it. Typical skeptopath. In your case, typical trolling behavior.
Time for me to make a prediction.
TL will not read the link. He will continue to dance around the issue. He will add nothing constructive to this thread. It is unfortunate, too, because this is the first LENR thread where one of the more notorious skeptopaths actually contributed something to the furtherance of the science. For ONCE.
Well, I might as well start thanking TL for bumping the thread, as usual, with the T4BTT acronym.
LOL! You don't even know, do you?
Of course I do. I’m the one who wrote the article. So now we know you didn’t read it, typical behavior of skeptopaths. Thanks for fulfilling my prediction. Perhaps some day it will bother you that you’re so predictably on the skepto-path.
Thanks for Bumping the Thread T4BTT
So you're using yourself as your authoritative reference?
I’m using myself as a way of knowing what’s in the article. Your accusation was that I didn’t know. My prediction was that you wouldn’t read it. You didn’t read it. Typical skeptopath.
Thanks for Bumping the Thread T4BTT
Oh well, T4BTT
That’s hilarious!
T4BTT
I didn’t realize that you made it up onto the board. Now, that’s hilarious!
asked & answered
-——————————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg87491.html-——————
I cancel it when the browser warnings popped up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.