Posted on 11/26/2013 2:38:27 PM PST by Kevmo
Only to those who prove themselves to be such by their own behavior on these threads. But thanks for proving my points so fully and wholeheartedly. As usual, total refusal to actually look at the published information, and any comment to shunt attention to that behavior away the one refusing. An exact fit to the phrase "pathological skepticism".
That's what the homos say, too.
LOL. More proof. You'll say or do anything to avoid confronting the issue of the existing data.
Here is the difference between you skeptopaths and real skeptics. A real science skeptic, given the references I have provided would not rest until he/she had read them.
A skeptopath will say or do anything to avoid reading them and change the subject to avoid acknowledging their existence, much less actually read and study them.
Methinks the shoe fits you quite well.
Enjoy your turkey, turkey.
When you have to employ those kinds of tactics, I don't really give a damn what you think.
If you’re interested in a practical source of energy, then investigate LENR. How many times has the PF Anomalous Heat Effect been replicated? more than 14,700. So, is this worth pursuing?
Where’s the beef?
***asked & answered
-————————————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg85737.html-—————————
I wonder what you skeptopaths will say then.
***They will claim they were pro-LENR the whole time. Same thing happened to the Wright brothers. Thousands of detractors, then the day after the demos in France, those same detractors were claiming they never said such things. It’s a form of neurosis, combined with bandwagon jumping.
Low Energy, indeed.
LOL. Likewise, m'dear. I prefer to deal with intellectually honest folk. But your every response continues to prove my point. Shuckin' and jivin' to wiggle out of actually looking at published data. I've told you where and how to find the proof you say you want. The ball is yours. The fact that you choose to drop it rather than run with it "tells all".
Why won’t you tell people your “published data” won’t heat a teakettle?
Firstly, because some of the experiments "will" heat a teakettle quite nicely.
Secondly, because, by my having given search terms, they can, with a quick Google search, look up the data for themselves and find it out if they are honestly curious about the subject.
You, having NOT looked at the data, and adamantly refusing to do so, of course, know none of these things.
I can't find any record of any of them having been conducted and verified to have produced that much heat in the course of the experiment.
You "can't find them" because you haven't looked. Why keep bullshitting? We both know that you have not, and will not, actually look up the information. So why not quit wasting your time and my time saying that you have??
skeptopath, indeed
You don't know that, so "we both" can't know that.
Sure I can. Deduced from your complete lack of knowledge of the details of the subject, it is obvious you have studied the published info marginally, if at all (probability based on exposure to other skeptopaths.....not at all). Likewise, you have made claims on this thread to have studied materials that you could not possibly have done in the time frames you were posting. And since you already know the state of your lack of study, yes "we both" can indeed "know that".
Search functions can tell you what isn't there pretty quickly.
So, oh genius of Google, what magic search terms did you use that revealed to you the fraudularity of cold fusion??
Your constant refrain has been "I couldn't find....." information that I absolutely know is available on-line, and in quite a few different places. I don't think that speaks very highly of your choice of search terms.
But list your terms and let us see what they do or don't show.
WW—”But list your terms and let us see what they do or don’t show.”
Waiting.......................
WW—”But list your terms and let us see what they do or don’t show.”
Still waiting.................
That's what happens when I don't give a damn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.