Why Democrats Will Never Run Another White, Male, Heterosexual Presidential Candidate

Red State ^ | 9/22/2013 | John Liberty

[ravenwolf]

Just works opposite for me, i will vote for the bigots every time because i don,t like bigots and the first smellers are always the very fellows.

[DaveA37]

And then there is “What Difference Does It make” Hitlary.

God help us all.

[ravenwolf]

And then there is “What Difference Does It make” Hitlary.

God help us all.

---

That is for sure.

[ravenwolf]

The problem is, as long as the candidate promises free money, they will get approx 28-35 million votes

---

That is exactly how they do it.

[ravenwolf]

Liberalism is an incurable mental disorder. Ever try talking to an old liberal?

---

You can not hold a conversation with them because they can not talk about facts, if they do they lose the argument so they make up what they say is facts, they are born liars.

[Altura Ct.]

this tactic is politically impenetrable and we’re likely to see it used by Democrats for a long time. The political shield is simply this: place minorities in power positions and when their policies are criticized, label that criticism as bigotry.

Yep, as long as whites and/or conservatives run away from race there is no defense against it.

[Nea Wood]

“Why Democrats Will Never Run Another White, Male, Heterosexual Presidential Candidate”

Neither will the Republicans. George W. Bush is the last such president we will ever have.