Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did FDR Fail to Relieve MacArthur and 151,000 Troops Fighting the Japanese in the Philippines?
Breitbart ^ | 4 Aug 2013 | Diana West

Posted on 08/04/2013 10:54:44 AM PDT by cutty

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-210 next last
To: Venturer
It wasn’t like Billy Mitchell hadn’t described the attack in detail years before.

Yes, and he got a court martial for his efforts, although it was supposedly for saying some Army and Navy officials were criminally negligent. I think he was right too. It is ironic, that Hap Arnold, Carl Spaatz, and the subject of the thread, none other than General MacArthur were there. I think Ben Foulois was there too, but no he was no fan of Mitchell. One of the prosecutor's grand sons, was Air Force chief of staff in the 1990s. I think in 2005, Mitchell congress authorized the promotion of Mitchell to Major General. Mitchell was vindicated, of course, and ironically, the aircraft named after him, the B-25, was the first to attack Japan. Too bad he did not live to see that. Mark, USAF, retired

121 posted on 08/04/2013 3:23:44 PM PDT by Mark17 (Yesterday I couldn't spell it. Today I are one, a creepy a$$ cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: All

Fascinating discussion here. My mother said aboutMacArthur that people either loved him or hated him.I see that still holds.


122 posted on 08/04/2013 3:26:01 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (If global warming exists I hope it is strong enough to reverse the Big Government snowball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
All over the Philippines ? They most certainly did. The Philippine Army alone had 13 divisions, each nominally with 10,000+ men, plus a proportional number of service units.

I believe it was largely a paper force.

If you want a complete, thorough breakdown I recommend Louis Mortons “Fall of the Philippines”, quite old now but its still the primary reference. This is one of the US Army “Green Books”, so its online - http://www.history.army.mil/books/wwii/5-2/5-2_Contents.htm

Thank. I read that some time ago.

123 posted on 08/04/2013 3:26:39 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
It wasn’t like Billy Mitchell hadn’t described the attack in detail years before.

Yes, and he got a court martial for his efforts, although it was supposedly for saying some Army and Navy officials were criminally negligent. I think he was right too. It is ironic, that Hap Arnold, Carl Spaatz, and the subject of the thread, none other than General MacArthur were there. I think Ben Foulois was there too, but no he was no fan of Mitchell. One of the prosecutor's grand sons, was Air Force chief of staff in the 1990s. I think in 2005, Mitchell congress authorized the promotion of Mitchell to Major General. Mitchell was vindicated, of course, and ironically, the aircraft named after him, the B-25, was the first to attack Japan. Too bad he did not live to see that. Mark, USAF, retired

124 posted on 08/04/2013 3:26:47 PM PDT by Mark17 (Yesterday I couldn't spell it. Today I are one, a creepy a$$ cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Dang cell phone


125 posted on 08/04/2013 3:27:43 PM PDT by Mark17 (Yesterday I couldn't spell it. Today I are one, a creepy a$$ cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
It wasn’t fiction and I don’t know if Gilbert is a leftie.

From what you described it was as devoid of reality as authors claiming MacArthur left Corregidor on PT boats loaded with household furniture that was then transferred to B-17s on Mindanao.

126 posted on 08/04/2013 3:29:59 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
McArthurs error was to cut checks he couldn’t cover. He promised to deliver a useful army with the resources he was given and of course could not.

Granted he was known for his optimism but how did he cut checks he couldn't cover when the leader of a nation promises him the necessary funding but doesn't deliver?

The Filipino troops were not ever up to facing Japanese combat units on even terms, even in Bataan. They managed to hold their positions, usually, only because they much outnumbered the attacking Japanese and because the USAFFE “burned up” the reliable Philippine Scouts and US 31st Regiment as “fire brigades” for counterattacks.

Can you cite one US soldier who served on Bataan that had anything but praise for the fighting qualities of the Filipino troops on Bataan?

127 posted on 08/04/2013 3:38:26 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: fso301

I have Bartsch’s book open before me. He has P-40 airframe numbers and materials receipts for every unit unloaded in Manila, with delivery dates.

P-40B - 31 delivered 5/17/1941
P-40E - 50 delivered 9/29/1941
P-40E - 24 delivered 11/25/1941

That’s 105 airframes, plus extra engines etc.
Bartsch effectively tracks every airframe.

Almost all were flyable or were soon made flyable at some point in the campaign; many were destroyed on the ground and in accidents but in few if any cases were delivered aircraft destroyed before they were made operational. So there were 100+ flyable P-40’s available. Not all at once, certainly.

As for the P-35’s, there certainly were many flyable units. It wasn’t a great aircraft but it was competitive with the standard Japanese Army fighter of the campaign, the “Nate”, which were used in larger numbers than Zeros. And like the P-40’s there were also many airframes brought back into service after engine overhauls and cannibalization.

The oxygen problem was again a failure brought about by negligence and inexperience. This was solved, later. It could have been solved before, but wasn’t.

And the pokey assembly/service/gunsight problems/lousy engine service/overhaul performance also were largely personnel and training problems. Also the lack of camouflaged airfields/dispersal, bad operations control, bad tactical/intercept control, lousy communications, etc. All much improved one month in. But by that time there were few airplanes left.


128 posted on 08/04/2013 3:38:54 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Certainly not a paper force.
At least 50,000 marched out of Bataan to Capas, probably more.
About half died in Capas. My granduncle among them.
Those were the survivors of the campaign, who had not deserted to that point. There must have been at least 70,000 mobilized, that showed up for mobilization, in Luzon alone.
Add in whats known of the various units in Mindanao, Cebu, Panay, and the Philippine Army was indeed a substantial force, in numbers anyway.


129 posted on 08/04/2013 3:45:34 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
The Japs reserved a special hatred of what they considered ''fellow Asians'' who supported the Allies.

Yes they did. Having traveled extensively in the Philippines myself, most recently, to Davao City a few months ago, I asked many Filipinos, who said, people of the Philippines, I shall return. They don't hesitate for a second, and say General MacArthur. That is one more reason I am retiring in Davao City. Americans in the Philippines, for the most part, are still well respected. It is no mystery to me, that in Davao City, and probably many places in the Philippines, their Main road is called MacArthur highway.

130 posted on 08/04/2013 3:45:43 PM PDT by Mark17 (Yesterday I couldn't spell it. Today I are one, a creepy a$$ cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
the Philippine Army was indeed a substantial force, in numbers anyway.

What size was it in July 1941? IIRC, the bulk of the force you cite circa 12/41 were fresh conscripts.

131 posted on 08/04/2013 3:49:53 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Mallonee for one. Fertig for another. And misc others in secondary sources. Otherwise it wasn’t PC to put down the Filipinos. They did try, they were loyal and friendly and brave, most often. But other than the Scouts they just were of low fighting value.

Also, look at who did what in the campaign. Who counterattacked at the Points ? At the Pockets ? At the Abucay line ?


132 posted on 08/04/2013 3:53:10 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
I have Bartsch’s book open before me. He has P-40 airframe numbers and materials receipts for every unit unloaded in Manila, with delivery dates.

P-40B - 31 delivered 5/17/1941 P-40E - 50 delivered 9/29/1941 P-40E - 24 delivered 11/25/1941

That’s 105 airframes, plus extra engines etc. Bartsch effectively tracks every airframe.

I'm not familiar with the author you cite. Numbers I cited are what was reported by commanders on Luzon Dec 7, 1941 as operational fighter aircraft.

133 posted on 08/04/2013 3:53:41 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Yea, I shouldn’t have said long before the US became involved in WWII. I was including them with the regular Chinese air force that took part in many operations against the Japanese such as The Battle of Shanghai way back in 1937.


134 posted on 08/04/2013 3:53:46 PM PDT by Wiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: fso301
MacArthur left Manila on March 11, 1942. The book I read deals with the events on a single day- Dec.7,1941. Because of the time difference, it's 12 hours I believe it was Dec.8 in the Philippines when the Japanese attacked.
135 posted on 08/04/2013 3:56:18 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Most weren’t supposed to be “fresh”, tyhey were supposed to have been trained in the previous five years of conscript “classes”, as with any conscription system.
But they were in fact effectively untrained.

Like I said, there probably were at least 70,000 that showed up upon mobilization in Luzon alone.

Morton says 120,000 Philippine Army troops served, altogether, based on mobilization returns and postwar claims.


136 posted on 08/04/2013 4:00:48 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
Mallonee for one.

IIRC, Mallonee praised the Filipino soldiers but was critical of the officers.

Fertig for another.

I haven't read Fertig but I suspect most of his commentary related to his experiences on Mindanao whereas I was referring to the Filipino troops on Luzon that fought on Bataan.

137 posted on 08/04/2013 4:04:10 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: fso301

I highly recommend Bartsch.
He does in-depth analysis and cross-check of primary sources.

Its like being a historical detective, of the data driven sort.

He breaks everything down to units, in detail. He even analyzes every combat sortie.


138 posted on 08/04/2013 4:04:39 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
Most weren’t supposed to be “fresh”, tyhey were supposed to have been trained in the previous five years of conscript “classes”, as with any conscription system. But they were in fact effectively untrained.

Agreed but they hadn't been trained in the previous 5 years because required resourced were never available.

139 posted on 08/04/2013 4:07:04 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Mallonee had plenty to say about the Filipino soldiers.
He had a realistic view of them.
Look at the part about where after seeing enemy fire plenty offered to drive trucks instead.
This is understandable. The war was a shock, and these soldiers were untrained and very badly led. Even their US senior officers, as many had, were also “green”.
Filipinos generally didn’t get a true dedication to the war until they had experienced the Japanese occupation for a while.


140 posted on 08/04/2013 4:09:08 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson