Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Linux May Be Better For You Than What You’re Using Now
Pinehead.tv ^ | 2 December 2012 | Anthony James

Posted on 12/06/2012 7:52:51 AM PST by ShadowAce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: ShadowAce
Options are good. You don’t have to use all the options.
Well, it's not like the feature is a Linux exclusive.

21 posted on 12/06/2012 9:39:16 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

shucks, i’ve used linux for years. have stuck with suse for years starting with 8.0. using 11.4 right now.

i dual boot between windows & linux, but usually stay in linux for months at a time. have a few apps i use on windows occasionally, but not often. I am not a computer whiz by any means.

however, i don’t have to spend alot of time worrying about viruses and buying the latest windows optimizers, registry fixers and whatnot that lines everyone’s pockets except those that use the operating system.

i find it funny that while searching the internet, that i get constant notices that my computer has countless viruses, registry errors, and is running slow and i need the latest program to fix my computer, while i am searching in linux.

if their programs can’t even identify what operating system that i am running, i doubt that they can fix windows problems.

blessings, bobo


22 posted on 12/06/2012 9:39:26 AM PST by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

shucks, i’ve used linux for years. have stuck with suse for years starting with 8.0. using 11.4 right now.

i dual boot between windows & linux, but usually stay in linux for months at a time. have a few apps i use on windows occasionally, but not often. I am not a computer whiz by any means.

however, i don’t have to spend alot of time worrying about viruses and buying the latest windows optimizers, registry fixers and whatnot that lines everyone’s pockets except those that use the operating system.

i find it funny that while searching the internet, that i get constant notices that my computer has countless viruses, registry errors, and is running slow and i need the latest program to fix my computer, while i am searching in linux.

if their programs can’t even identify what operating system that i am running, i doubt that they can fix windows problems.

blessings, bobo


23 posted on 12/06/2012 9:40:41 AM PST by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Well, with Linux, this becomes reality. Mind you, not all changes are easily made, and you may need a book on C programming ....


Stupid statement - if you need a book on C programming then there’s
no way that you’re going to be able to modify any production source code
in this lifetime. It’s theoretically achievable but practically not going to happen.


24 posted on 12/06/2012 9:41:08 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

bkmk


25 posted on 12/06/2012 10:00:26 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele; ShadowAce
Option 1: call Microsoft support or the OEM support line

Option 2: go to puppylinux.com and rely on the kindness of strangers as well as their punctuality and patience

You forgot Option three:

Option 3: Call your local guru and have him come out and set it up for you, the same as he did on your Windows box, because as a 'mouth breathing user', you didn't know how to set up the damn printer in Windows either.

I have approximately 25/30 home users that have been converted to Linux, and the transition was not terrible for any of them. Some found it completely painless. It has been a pretty easy fix for them. No more bugs, which is the main reason I was normally called out anyway, in most cases...

More and more, local service techs are becoming conversant with Linux, so relying upon 'snooty Linux forums' is really not your only recourse.

26 posted on 12/06/2012 12:20:46 PM PST by roamer_1 (Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
>>>> The biggest problem with Linux is the various flavors.<<<<

Can someone recommend a Linux distro that a novice computer user can use for web browsing and email?

I have used Puppy Linux, Fedora, and Ubuntu and like them all but I don't think they are for non-technical types.
27 posted on 12/06/2012 2:53:45 PM PST by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Pretty much any distro will get a web browser up and running. However, the problem is going to be all the plugins and codecs that allow for a rich browsing experience (Youtube videos, java apps, other multimedia). No linux distro (of which I’m aware) has all that stuff configured “out of the box” due to legal/licensing concerns. (there may be some I just don’t know of any). So there is a one time cost involved with getting all that stuff going. Printers the same way.

Least painless way to get that going is probably to pay or barter with a known expert to get over that one time hump. After that it should be smooth sailing for an install that just has to do basic browsing.

From a net cost perspective you’d still be way ahead particularly if you can work something out via barter.


28 posted on 12/06/2012 2:59:41 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

Meant to say “least *painful*” - typing too fast.


29 posted on 12/06/2012 3:01:08 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

I actually think that this may be one of the biggest differentiators between linux and the “Pay” OS’es. Since you pay a Windows tax or a Mac tax the various plugins and codecs can be all rolled into there and part of your tax is going to go to pay small but non-zero licensing fees.

To date this sort of arrangement just doesn’t exist in the linux world. So while a linux distro will “work” right out of the box, it won’t be fully functional in a true multimedia sense. Will this change going forward? It’s possible but quite frankly I don’t see it changing.

So viewed in this way, linux is a bit like buying unfinished furniture or maybe a cake mix, while the “pay” OS’s are like buying finished furniture or a pre-baked cake. And this is a direct consequence of some fairly fundamental things like business model, GPL licensing, and basic philosophy.

There are certainly websites (not to mention linux tools) that will get your multimedia stuff going for you but at some point there is some effort required, and some knowing where to find the websites or tools etc.

At the end of the day there are a whole lot of people that just want to open up a box, connect a few cables, hit the power button and see youtube videos of dogs jumping in swimming pools and have it all done by the time it’s time to eat Christmas lunch. For those people linux will never be their best option.


30 posted on 12/06/2012 3:08:53 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Question: If one has an Android phone, is there an advantage to using Linux?


31 posted on 12/07/2012 4:52:25 PM PST by Jabba the Nutt (.Are they stupid, malicious or evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt
There's always an advantage to using Linux :)

In terms of using your phone, though--I doubt it. I don't have any issues accessing my phone on the rare occasions I need to, though.

There's definitely no disadvantage.

32 posted on 12/07/2012 5:59:21 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: relictele; ShadowAce

Obligatory post.

33 posted on 12/07/2012 7:05:04 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

I like that pic.


34 posted on 12/07/2012 7:44:42 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TChris
PowerShell is an extremely powerful CLI. Windows Server 2012 (or whatever they end up calling it) is managed entirely through PS.

I've been playing with that since it was Monad, and now do most of my work in a PS shell or the ISE. Anybody with a clue should have seen this coming when they put Jeffery Snover in charge of the Server division at MS.

35 posted on 12/07/2012 7:51:11 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; ShadowAce
http://search.dilbert.com/comic/Computer%20Holy%20Wars
36 posted on 12/07/2012 7:51:37 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

“Command line”

Command lines are for idiot geeks that can’t write an effective user interface and think they’re being clever by memorizing arcane command line codes.


37 posted on 12/07/2012 9:04:34 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

“More work gets done under Linux than with any flavor of Windows. “

Yeah, OK, and liberalism isn’t Communism.


38 posted on 12/07/2012 9:06:08 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Command lines for for smarter geeks who need to manage 500 servers and perform the same action on all of them.

I can do that much faster in the CLI than you can on the GUI.

39 posted on 12/08/2012 11:42:45 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Command lines are for idiot geeks that can’t write an effective user interface and think they’re being clever by memorizing arcane command line codes.

Or, they're the pure, direct interface into the O/S and used heavily by actual system administrators with enough experience to know that there is no GUI that can effectively cover the millions of variations on commands needed to do everyone's job effectively.

Maybe that's it. :) ...or maybe you're right and tens of thousands of sysads really are idiots and have been doing it wrong all these decades.

40 posted on 12/10/2012 7:15:33 AM PST by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson