Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Dark Side of Thomas Jefferson
SmithsonianMag.com ^ | 10-2012 | Henry Wiencek

Posted on 09/22/2012 6:47:35 AM PDT by Renfield

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last
To: x
I think it a fair proposition that if short fiber cotton had never become such a powerful influence in American economics and politics, slavery would have died out in the south just as it faded for economic reasons in the north, and there would not have been such a thing as the civil war.

The Cotton Gin allowed all that followed. But if Whitney hadn't invented it, someone else would have. It was the age of invention, for good or bad.

101 posted on 09/23/2012 6:56:31 PM PDT by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

It makes them feeeeeeeel better about the fact that their ancestors started a war that cost 600,000 plus lives.


102 posted on 09/23/2012 7:03:47 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

I selected two statements out of a lost cause rant to question and I researched the correct information. I was actually surprised that Ellison owned as many slaves as he did, but my feelings about this situation were exactly the same as yours.


103 posted on 09/23/2012 10:08:54 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Most Freedmen farmed the same land they did as slaves, only they were now sharecroppers.

Leon F. Litwack's Been in the Storm So Long: The Aftermath of Slavery cites numerous letters from slaveowners who found that most of their slaves had run off as the Union Army approached. Some came back. Many didn't.

This even makes its way into the fictional and very romanticized Gone With The Wind. You may remember the few slaves who stayed with Scarlett on the plantation. Most didn't -- the field slaves who aren't really "characters" in the book took off when it was safe to do so and didn't come back.

Would Miss Scarlett really have been out there working the fields if the field hands had stayed? I know it's fiction, but this is something that was so true and so familiar to people that Margaret Mitchell couldn't lie about it.

Most freed slaves had zero animosity towards the former slave owners.

How would you know? It's not like freed slaves could honestly tell the old masters how they felt. If freedmen had feelings of anger, animosity, or resentment, it would be dangerous to air them to anyone, for fear the word would get back to people who could hurt them. Those who did have animosity probably left and tried to put it all behind them.

104 posted on 09/24/2012 2:08:05 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson