Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blue Stars Confirm Recent Creation
Institute for Creation Research ^ | September 2012 | Jason Lisle, Ph.D.

Posted on 09/01/2012 7:28:34 PM PDT by lasereye

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: coloradan
The lifetimes of other kinds of stars could be billions of years but nothing demonstrates that they actually are. They are not evidence for an old universe. Nobody said they only last 6000 years.
21 posted on 09/01/2012 8:18:53 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Elendur

No God hasn’t deceived us. I don’t know what you mean by “beyond what I seem to believe”.


22 posted on 09/01/2012 8:20:47 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Elendur
(which btw, has the wife of Adam created twice, and differently...)

Uh no. That's nonsense.

23 posted on 09/01/2012 8:23:18 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454
A common saying that describes a primary assumption of evolutionists is that if you put a bunch of monkeys in a room and set them in front of computer keyboards, eventually they will type out the Encyclopedia Britannica.

That does not come from evolutionary theory; that is probability theory and the Law of Large Numbers. And it is correct. Given enough time, a monkey striking random keys on a keyboard will produce War and Peace or some other recognizable piece of literature. Sure, it might take billions upon billions upon billions of years, but eventually it would happen *by pure chance* because, with a finite alphabet of 26 letters (English), the number of permutations of letters you can type out on, say, 1000 pages is also finite.

Sorry for the ramble; I love probability theory.

24 posted on 09/01/2012 8:23:39 PM PDT by kevao (Is your ocean any lower than it was four years ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Uh no. That's nonsense.

On this point we agree.

25 posted on 09/01/2012 8:25:18 PM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

Here is the problem with this so called creation science. It starts off with an arbitrary claim and treats it as an irreducible primary. It then goes out and tries to find evidence to validate the arbitrary claim while ignoring any evidence that contradicts the claim. Science, at least valid science, starts with the axiom that existence exists and seeks to validate all subsequent knowledge with logic. By the nature of the Universe a contradiction can not exist. There have been countless measurements made of the age of the universe and the Earth through multiple methods using half lives of radioactive elements as well as distance measurements and the speed of light, which has been proven over and over again. Please explain how this theory of yours invalidates all of those previous measurements. I would love to see an astrophysicist weigh in on this.


26 posted on 09/01/2012 8:26:29 PM PDT by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

What reason is there to believe that the speed of light was once different?


27 posted on 09/01/2012 8:27:56 PM PDT by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: albionin

What reason is there to believe that it was always the same?

Were you around to observe it?


28 posted on 09/01/2012 8:31:15 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of America starts the day Christians stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kevao
Seems like probability theory clashes with the law of entropy.
The problem is that there's no rule that says the monkey must always strike different sequence of keys. More likely, it will just repeat the same gibberish ad infinitum without ever producing anything resembling recognizable literature.

So, no, it's not correct.

29 posted on 09/01/2012 8:33:30 PM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

The fact that I was not around to observe it is not evidence that it was different at one time. Your question amounts to the demand that I prove it didn’t happen. I can not and will not attempt to prove a negative. Again what evidence is there that the speed of light is variable? I would like a direct answer please.


30 posted on 09/01/2012 8:36:44 PM PDT by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
What reason is there to believe that it was always the same?

General Relativity.

What have you got?

31 posted on 09/01/2012 8:38:23 PM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

I was not able to take a picture. With the naked eye, it looks like a star flashing different colors- red, green, white and blue. Through binoculars, it was well defined It was stationary for about 50 minutes and then dropped below the tree line. Through binoculars, I could see it morphing into different shapes, like an amoeba. It is gone now.

Two commercial pilots were here and saw it - they have about 80 years of flying experience between the two of them. They stated that they had absolutely no idea as to what that could be, had never seen anything like it (lots of international flying experience) and it definitely wasn’t a planet or a star.


32 posted on 09/01/2012 8:40:48 PM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stormhill

He has faith. You can not argue with faith. It has a blank check on reality.


33 posted on 09/01/2012 8:41:26 PM PDT by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: stormhill

If you want to nitpick, then instead of a monkey, make it a computer program that randomly generates letters, giving equal likelihood to all letters. No more clash with your law of entropy.

Do you really dispute the mathematical theory behind this?


34 posted on 09/01/2012 8:41:54 PM PDT by kevao (Is your ocean any lower than it was four years ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: albionin

I was simply pointing out an obvious unknown in the equation. A huge one.


35 posted on 09/01/2012 8:42:10 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of America starts the day Christians stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: albionin

Truly sad.


36 posted on 09/01/2012 8:43:39 PM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: stormhill
What have you got?

A huge gap in my knowledge, since I've only been around for about half a century.

And you've got a theory.

37 posted on 09/01/2012 8:45:43 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of America starts the day Christians stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tjd1454

As a person of the Lutheran faith, I accept the tenant that “In the beginning God created the heavens and earth”. However, I often ask ‘Where did God come from and what was it like before He made these entities’.


38 posted on 09/01/2012 8:46:05 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

But it is not an unknown. Unless you claim that we can not know anything. Prove it. Prove that man’s consciousness is invalid. Prove that logic is invalid. Again what evidence do you have for your arbitrary claim that the speed of light is variable?


39 posted on 09/01/2012 8:47:19 PM PDT by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kevao
No, I will not let myself be positioned against mathematics.

Problem is that with a computer, you have introduced into the equation the element of intelligence (however artificial) so I must ask, are you sure you want to go down this path?

40 posted on 09/01/2012 8:49:22 PM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson