Posted on 07/27/2012 3:37:16 PM PDT by Signalman
Post #338. You:
[Romney's] Sarah Palin's guy. He's Rick Santorum's guy. He's Jim Demint's guy. He's Ron and Rand Paul's guy.
Me:
*Yaaaaawwwwwnnnnnnnnn* "In logic, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for 'appeal to the people') is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or most people believe it. In other words, the basic idea of the argument is: 'If many believe so, it is so.'"
Nothing whatsoever in that exchange, re: Cruz. The facts are, to paraphrase a notoriously dishonest online yip-yop, "what they are."
Again: DIS. Missed.
LOL! Pay attention. See #313. 313 -> 315 -> 332 -> 338 -> 361.
"our guy" refers to Ted Cruz, who hopefully will win next Tuesday and next November and will have a GOP Senate and President with which to do great things.
Hit it out of the park, cynwoody
You called me a CINO because I want to win in November.
***No, I called you a CINO because you’re a Conservative In Name Only.
Is JimRob a commie sleeper, or not? Are those of us who stick to our conservative principles commie sleepers? Only a CINO would make such an accusation, so as to cause discord among conservatives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.