Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I’m Voting for Mitt Romney and Why You Should Too
godfatherpolitics.com ^ | 7/27/2012 | Gary DeMar

Posted on 07/27/2012 3:37:16 PM PDT by Signalman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 361-364 next last
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
No need to get emo.

"I'm sorry, but I've answered this question so many dozens upon dozens of times."

Sorry, I was unaware you had.

Can you then link to just one of the dozens and dozens of times in which you showed support for a candidate for president in the 2012 election?
Just one.
Thank you.

"shouldn't -- need my "suggestion,"

Why do you then make sure to oppose the decisions of those that support Mitt?

281 posted on 07/27/2012 11:33:00 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I am with: Sarah, Bachmann, Santorum, Herman Cain, Dick Cheney, W, Rush on Mitt in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Do you ever feel like you are in the Twilight Zone, having to defend yourself on a conservative forum for not voting for a liberal?

As stated earlier, in this very thread: "[T]hat's what inevitably causes me to snort in derision at the shriller, more hysterical CINO apologists within the (purportedly) 'ABO' camp. As I've repeatedly informed them: I AM voting for someone other than Obama (i.e., "Anyone But Obama.").

"That only seems to make them more sulky, rather than less." ;)

282 posted on 07/27/2012 11:33:32 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Do you really think you are going to get me to go against my principles with that kind of rhetoric?

Excuse me for butting in, but what a bizarre question.

What kind of rhetoric will make you go against your principles?

283 posted on 07/27/2012 11:34:28 PM PDT by Chunga (Ron Paul is a fruitcakey jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: PoliticalArsonist

I wrote:

“Romney is not and never has been a conservative so nothing he does negatively will change who we know him to be.”

I meant to say:

Romney is not and never has been a conservative so nothing he does negatively will be the fault of conservatives.


284 posted on 07/27/2012 11:34:43 PM PDT by PoliticalArsonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Can you then link to just one of the dozens and dozens of times in which you showed support for a candidate for president in the 2012 election?

I just told you where my vote is going, in #268. Thank you for proving my point so readily.

Joining the crowd: "PLONK."

285 posted on 07/27/2012 11:35:56 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
then nominating a conservative -- just this once, mind you -- was the surest way to nab it.

The convention is a month from now. How do you expect to make that happen?

If your plan does not lead to the ouster of Obama, it is not useful.

286 posted on 07/27/2012 11:35:56 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Do you think that your sophomoric questions are going to change any minds?

/johnny

287 posted on 07/27/2012 11:36:08 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

“sophomoric questions”

You are very emotional.


288 posted on 07/27/2012 11:40:14 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I am with: Sarah, Bachmann, Santorum, Herman Cain, Dick Cheney, W, Rush on Mitt in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Chunga
Excuse me for butting in, but what a bizarre question.

What kind of rhetoric will make you go against your principles?

It's a bizarre kind of time. We have them every 4 years, 'round these parts.

The short answer to my rhetorical question is: Nothing anyone here says will make me go against my principles.

/johnny

289 posted on 07/27/2012 11:41:34 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
The convention is a month from now. How do you expect to make that happen?

That jpeg was fair warning, created (and first posted) last year. As usual, the CINOs currently infesting the Republican party elected to go their own way; now, so will I. Cope. Deal.

If your plan does not lead to the ouster of Obama, it is not useful.

Listen harder, this time: "If my vote's genuinely that crucial to you and yours, then nominating a conservative -- just this once, mind you -- was the surest way to nab it."

290 posted on 07/27/2012 11:41:37 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

You cannot tell us who a principled true conservative™ is to consider.

You cannot tell us which true conservative you supported in the primary.

You believe It would be wrong to share such.

But it’s OK to share that any who support Mitt are wrong.


291 posted on 07/27/2012 11:45:01 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I am with: Sarah, Bachmann, Santorum, Herman Cain, Dick Cheney, W, Rush on Mitt in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
If your plan does not lead to the ouster of Obama, it is not useful.

The go-along-to-get-along, country-club, establishment GOP made this mess. They need to come up with a plan, now that it's obvious that they have lost a lot of the conservative base.

Why should the conservatives have to come up with a plan to clean up their mess?

I can suggest that you stick a sock in Karl Rove's mouth, so he doesn't attack conservatives on national television.

/johnny

292 posted on 07/27/2012 11:47:19 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
That jpeg was fair warning, created (and first posted) last year.

Takes more than a jpeg to oust a commie fascist.

If you choose to fade into third-party irrelevance, then it's on you if the Won wins a second term!

293 posted on 07/27/2012 11:49:09 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Actually, that's more objective than emotional, but being human, yes, I do have emotions.

So answer my question. Do you think you are changing any minds with your sophomoric questions?

/johnny

294 posted on 07/27/2012 11:49:33 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
The go-along-to-get-along, country-club, establishment GOP made this mess. They need to come up with a plan, now that it's obvious that they have lost a lot of the conservative base.

Why should the conservatives have to come up with a plan to clean up their mess?

Cut. Print. Perfect.


295 posted on 07/27/2012 11:49:57 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
it's on you if the Won wins a second term!

Then you really, REALLY needed to put that little bit of extra effort into securing my vote, didn't you?

Next time, you'll doubtless know better.

296 posted on 07/27/2012 11:51:58 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I reject the emotional premise of your question.

Here’s the only principle you have shared on this thread:

Troll:

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.


297 posted on 07/27/2012 11:52:07 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I am with: Sarah, Bachmann, Santorum, Herman Cain, Dick Cheney, W, Rush on Mitt in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
I told you that I voted for Gingrich in the primary.

As I noted before, you aren't interested in answers.

Those that support Mitt are doing what their principles tell them to do, which is vote for a liberal. I don't begrudge that, or call you wrong for doing it.

/johnny

298 posted on 07/27/2012 11:52:22 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
If you think I'm a troll, mash that "report abuse" button and get me zotted.

I thought you were here to discuss politics.

How about explaining how voting for someone that supported tax-payer funded abortions in his home state is a conservative political position.

/johnny

299 posted on 07/27/2012 11:55:50 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
Wait, I thought you said it was MY fault.

/johnny

300 posted on 07/27/2012 11:57:55 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 361-364 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson