Skip to comments.
Terrestrial Planets Could be More Common Than Gas Giants
Universe Today ^
| June 15, 2012
| Andy Tomaswick, Nancy Atkinson
Posted on 06/19/2012 3:36:59 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Info source: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
This artist's conception shows a newly formed star surrounded by a swirling protoplanetary disk of dust and gas. Credit: University of Copenhagen/Lars Buchhave

1
posted on
06/19/2012 3:37:06 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
To: KevinDavis
2
posted on
06/19/2012 3:40:52 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
3
posted on
06/19/2012 3:41:22 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Mmogamer; ...
OTOH:
Alien Earths Could Form Earlier than Expected
David A. Aguilar & Christine Pulliam
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Harvard-Smithsonian Center For Astrophysics
Previous studies have shown that Jupiter-sized gas giants tend to form around stars containing more heavy elements than the Sun. However, new research by a team of astronomers found that planets smaller than Neptune are located around a wide variety of stars, including those with fewer heavy elements than the Sun. As a result, rocky worlds like Earth could have formed earlier than expected in the universe's history. "This work suggests that terrestrial worlds could form at almost any time in our galaxy's history," said Smithsonian astronomer David Latham (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics). "You don't need many earlier generations of stars." ...Astronomers call chemical elements heavier than hydrogen and helium "metals." They measure the metal content, or metallicities, of other stars using the Sun as a benchmark. Stars with more heavy elements are considered metal-rich while stars with fewer heavy elements are considered metal-poor... They measured the stars' metallicities and correlated that with the sizes of the associated planets. Large planets tended to orbit stars with solar metallicities or higher. Smaller worlds, though, were found around metal-rich and metal-poor stars alike. "Giant planets prefer metal-rich stars. Little ones don't," explained Latham. They found that terrestrial planets form at a wide range of metallicities, including systems with only one-quarter of the Sun's metal content.
4
posted on
06/19/2012 3:41:38 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
In before the "we're the only ones in the Universe" posts...
5
posted on
06/19/2012 3:41:47 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
To: raybbr
Seems to me that if we’re alone, God has given it to us to explore and populate.
6
posted on
06/19/2012 3:43:11 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: raybbr
;’) Nicely done! Also IB “it’s only a theory”, “just in it for the grant money”...
7
posted on
06/19/2012 3:43:29 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
And lets not forget the ever popular, “We’ll never be able to go there anyway”.
8
posted on
06/19/2012 3:48:04 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: SunkenCiv
9
posted on
06/19/2012 3:49:35 AM PDT
by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
To: JoeProBono
10
posted on
06/19/2012 3:51:14 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: JoeProBono
11
posted on
06/19/2012 3:57:21 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: cripplecreek
Even worse is someone who wants to pretend to do the math first, *then* tell us “we’ll never be able to go there anyway”. ;’)
12
posted on
06/19/2012 3:58:09 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: cripplecreek
13
posted on
06/19/2012 4:06:01 AM PDT
by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
To: SunkenCiv
14
posted on
06/19/2012 4:27:20 AM PDT
by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
To: SunkenCiv
If our new found “planetoid” category counts, then our solar system has more rocky planets than gas giants (4 vs. 5+). So this isn’t that wild a concept.
15
posted on
06/19/2012 4:39:50 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: SampleMan
Invent warp drive, start colonizing!
16
posted on
06/19/2012 7:09:06 AM PDT
by
GraceG
To: cripplecreek
And lets not forget the ever popular, Well never be able to go there anyway.because of the vast distances between stars, I believe at least one of three things need to be true.
- Zero point energy.If you're a poor bastard stuck travelling the cosmos at sublight speeds, it's gonna take you a long time to get from here to there. Unless you're able to accelerate to at least a modest fraction of C, you're talking decades or centuries. Even if you're able to implement some kind of hybernation protocols, you still have to have power and life support when you come out of it. Even nuclear power is not attractive when you'er talking those kinds of time scales - especially since you will, by definition be pretty darn far from logistical support.
- Faster Than Light (FTL) travel is possible. If you can do FTL, then you hopefully are no longer stuck for decades travelling from star to star. Hopefully FTL travel doesn't also require a ZPM to get moving that fast. Even travelling at C, you're still movnig pretty slowly when you consider cosmic distances. If you're ever bored, figure out how long it would take you to get to Alpha Centuri travelling at one AU (~93 million miles) per second.
- Travel through wormholes/folds in space. This avoids all the mucking about of physically crossing the distance you want to travel. Hopefully you'd be able to generate the wormhole at will without having a ZPM to power it.
Personally, I hope that all three are possible, and BTW, I want a ZPM to run my motorcycle.
17
posted on
06/19/2012 7:22:58 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
To: GraceG
There are lots of Class M planets. They visited a new one almost every week on Star Trek.
They even found a planet on which there was silicon based life, as opposed to the carbon based life found on earth. So there could even be life in forms we wouldn’t think about, such as silicon based life, out there in the cosmos.
To: zeugma
As an interesting ‘homework’ assignment.
Figure out how long it would take to accelerate to 90% of the speed of light at one gravity of constant acceleration.
Then, of course as you approached your destination you would then have to decelerate at one gravity for the same amount of time.
19
posted on
06/19/2012 7:37:35 AM PDT
by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
To: zeugma
There are a lot of very interesting little understood things going on at the sub atomic level which could potentially be harnessed for our own use.
“Spooky action at a distance” as Einstein called it or quantum entanglement has the potential of communicating instantaneously over billions of light years.
Obviously we aren’t going far right now but that’s what science is for. Its also possible that we simply haven’t stumbled across or conceived of something extremely simple
20
posted on
06/19/2012 7:45:32 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson