[equaviator]

[The Cajun]

I know wrong when I see it, this is wrong.

Nuff said!

[Happy Rain]

If the female breast evolved solely for nursing it would be a barely noticeable chest spigot like on other primates.

Instead, because humans developed a taste for face to face “bonding,” the woman's breast mutated to imitate the buttocks which swell, attracting male attentions, in all female primates when in estrus.

Natural Selection made the female breast a sexual enticement in order to add to the woman's physical attractiveness because lasting pair bonding in a species where young are long developing is vital.

So according to Anthropology 101, female breasts are both functional (though very large mammaries can obstruct infant breathing) and sexual by nature...and Time is obviously exploiting the latter.

[broken_arrow1]

Now that the Obama Gay Marriage thing is ratcheting up, I can only guess what kind of sucking the next Time Magazine cover will show.

[Freddd]

Gretawire’s blog says the child is 4 years old, instead of 3.

Looks 6.

Either way it’s offensive. It was meant to be.

I hate the age of Obama.

[4rcane]

[4rcane]

[Lazamataz]

Hello, weird part of reality. We meet again.

[NonValueAdded]

It’s waaaaay past time to stop breastfeeding when the kid is old enough to call for lunch by saying “tittie, mommy, tittie.” Personally, I’d stop when the first tooth appeared but what do I know?

[Fawn]

VERY DISTURBING photo. It’s pornographic, child abuse, embarrassing, immoral and I think this woman is disgusting. This kid is going to have issues growing up.....

[blindsangamon]

I DO NOT want to see what they have planned for the cover of their Father’s Day issue.

[Mase]