Skip to comments.
Medical Sleuths Discuss the Forensics of Death (Lenin, Lincoln, Custer, etc.)
Washington Post ^
| May 6
| Manuel Roig-Franzia
Posted on 05/07/2012 1:52:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: nickcarraway
"...speculated that Lenin, even though his health was in precipitous decline because of the strokes, might have been finished off by a poisoning ordered by Joseph Stalin.
Why the need to kill a dying man?
Just look at what stokes did to JFK's father, Joseph P. Kennedy. And nobody's impies he was murdered.
Lenin was well on the way to wearing a wooden suit. Sometimes the facts are just that, the facts. There's no need to "sexy up" the truth.
21
posted on
05/07/2012 4:35:12 PM PDT
by
RedMonqey
(Men who will not suffer to self govern, will suffer under the governance of lesser men.)
To: RedMonqey
Custer’s mistake started with his failure to follow Gen. Terry’s orders. He was not supposed to start a general action until Terry and Gibbon’s column approached the Indian village from the north. Custer’s column cut across from the east far north of where he supposed to. Thus he arrived early and from the wrong direction for the planned pincer movement.
22
posted on
05/07/2012 5:35:46 PM PDT
by
gusty
To: robowombat
Not the Battle of the Little Big Horn. I'm curious about your outlook on the Washita River. You would call it either the Battle of the Washita River or the Black Kettle Massacre depending on your view. Ostensibly where Custer got his "Son of the Morning Star" sobriquet. 1868.
My ancestor was nowhere near Little Big Horn, but he was a scout for Custer at the Washita River.
23
posted on
05/07/2012 5:43:01 PM PDT
by
Scoutmaster
(You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
To: robowombat
"To claim an officer has a personality disorder because he is an aggressive battle captain is classic media BS. Custer may not have been a nice man according to today's PC mantras but one doesn't become a Major General at age 26 by being a fool or a head case." The Custer of the Civil War and the Custer of the Indian Wars seems to me to be two very different people. Men who served with him and loved him during the Civil War ended up hating his guts out West. His court martial in 1867 and his abandonment of Maj. Elliot at the Washita come to mind as two examples of actions that seem at odds with the Custer of the Civil War.
Was he a "head case?" Beats me. But when people who had known him for years turned against him that indicates something had definitely changed in the man.
24
posted on
05/07/2012 5:59:37 PM PDT
by
Flag_This
(Real presidents don't bow.)
To: Scoutmaster
"You would call it either the Battle of the Washita River or the Black Kettle Massacre depending on your view." FWIW, I don't believe Custer had a clue that Black Kettle was anywhere in the area. According to Capt. Albert Barnitz, the cavalry cut a trial identified by their scouts as "hostiles" because it lacked any dog tracks. Apparently dogs did accompany hunting parties, but not war parties.
The cavalry column followed the trail through the night to an indian encampment and set up for their attack in the dark. They attacked at first light, so I doubt they even saw Black Kettle's U.S. flag until it was too late. Black Kettle may have been completely peaceful, but there were other hostile bands up and down the same river. Major Elliot could tell you. I don't for a second believe Custer and Co. deliberately set out to destroy a peaceful band of indians.
25
posted on
05/07/2012 6:25:22 PM PDT
by
Flag_This
(Real presidents don't bow.)
To: nickcarraway
26
posted on
05/07/2012 8:13:33 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Scoutmaster
I misunderstood your question. Why, I don't know. I call it the ‘Battle of the Washita’. There was plenty of fighting and the blow struck did both damage a major group of hostiles due more to killing the horse herd and burning property. Savage warfare as combat against tribal peoples was inadvertently appropriately called in the 19th century inevitably included deaths of numbers of technical non combatants. This was true on the steppes of Central Asia or the dry plains of south Argentina or the expanses of the American West.
To: gusty
Custers mistake started with his failure to follow Gen. Terrys orders.
Yes, Custer made quite a few mistakes but in his defense, sometimes officers must use initiative to take advantage of ever changing battlefield conditions.
The problem this time, Custer misread, disregarded accurate information and proceeded recklessly.
In my humble opinion, he was frustrated by the Indian guerrilla's tactics and believed wrongly this was his best chance to deliver a devastating blow to enemy and regain his glory of his Civil War years and end his career as the soldier who tamed the savage tribes.
Just my thoughts.
28
posted on
05/10/2012 3:48:05 PM PDT
by
RedMonqey
(Men who will not suffer to self govern, will suffer under the governance of lesser men.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson