Posted on 05/02/2012 4:35:14 PM PDT by MacMattico
check the runner:
When the pitcher looks in the direction of a runner on base and thereby causes him to not take as large of a lead as he would otherwise have taken.
look the runner back:
1) When there is a runner on first base, a pitcher who has already gone into the stretch may step off the rubber and either threaten a throw toward first base or just stare at the runner to encourage him to step back toward first. In either case he's said to "look the runner back" to first (rather than throwing over to first in an effort to pick the runner off).
2) When there is a runner on second or third base (but not first) with fewer than two outs, an infielder fielding a sharp ground ball briefly stares at the runner to discourage him from trying to advance. The fielder then throws to first to force out the batter.
Of course, at the level your daughter is playing, it would have been just as wrong for the coach to berate the catcher as it was for him to lay into your daughter.
‘Journalist’: “Mr. President, one year later & in hindsight, would you still have rid the world of Bin Laden?”
(sorry ;)
Good players often go by instinct — it seemed to be a bang-bang play, and her action was warranted. Chalk it up to a life lesson...
Your daughter made the right play, and the coach doesn’t know much about the game. With a man on third, the second baseman is either playing in or back. If playing back, your daughter should of been told to get the out at first. The runner will break for home on grounders hit to the right side,and the run is conceded. If the coach is telling the second baseman to check the runner, then I assume the infield is in. In that case, the whole point of playing the infield in is to get the runner at home. If the coach did not want the play at home, he should of had your daughter playing back. The term “looking her back” means after fielding the grounder, look at the runner at third. If the runner is going, throw home, if the runner is not, go to first. I hope this answers your question. My baseball background is a pitcher in NCAA Div I, and briefly Low A. Also coached HS.
The intent was to prevent the runner from scoring and tying the game so getting a "sure out" was not the issue.............
And "checking the runner" would only apply had the ball been hit to the left side and it likely would have worked.
However, the runner obviously had the go sign to break for home with the batter being instructed to hit to the right side........
The third base coach was right in giving the instructions to go, the girl's coach who told her to check and throw to first was wrong, the girl throwing to home when "checking the runner" was not an issue, was 100% right..........
I agree.
Talk it out with your daughter.
I would not bring up the subject of leaving the team until she does.
Again talk that through. Let her make the decision on her own, and back her up whatever she decides.
BTW; Loud, abusive, gesturing coaches are usually ill-prepared to coach young people. If he, too, is not having fun, he should find a new vocation.
She tried to stop the run from scoring and would have done so had not the catcher made an error. First base wasn’t a sure out at this level either. She should have been commended for making a good play.
Timely thread for me. I have an old mans softball league game in about one hour.
Sorry your daughters feelings were hurt but these things are going to happen in organized sports. She will get over it and maybe next time not take it so hard when something unfair happens to her. Personally I think your daughter made the right play. Maybe the catcher is the coach’s pet and the coach needed someone else to blame.
To add, when playing back, the fielder doesn’t even bother checking the runner when playing middle infield.
So sorry to hear this. This coach obviously does not understand the dynamics that go into making a successful team(note, I did not say a winning team).
Unwritten rule #1 in baseball or softball is never give up a run that you do not have to.
Having the ball in front of her, your daughter had the ability to judge whether or not she could make a throw home and get the runner. Since her throw beat the runner to the plate, she made the correct choice. Allowing a runner to score from third on an infield ground ball is never a good thing. It sends the wromg message to the opposing team and before you know it you will have singles turning into doubles and walks into triples. The opposing team needs to be afraid to take a step off the bag much less take off running on the pitch.
The ‘coach’ in this situation forgot what the roles of players and coaches are. Once the team takes the field, he has to rely on the judgement of his players based on what they have done in practice to carry the day and to get the job done. To chew out a middle school student for having made an instinctive play on the field,(which was correct by the way) is inexcusable and has to make one wonder just how in the heck did he get the job in the first place?
I would hate to see your daughter’s enthusiam dampened by this experience. I am thinking that a request to have a private meeting with the president of your school board might be in order. You might contact the parents of the girls who did not return this year and see if they had similar issues.
This ‘coach’, needs to go.
Tell your daughter to hang in there. There will be better days.
I think there were no outs, maybe one.
I agree with you 100% and the infield was in.
Played all forms (hardball and fast-slow pitch softball) myself for 30 years and coached Bobby Sox and American Girls in Cali for 10 + years. Not an expert, just want to assure you I know and have played the game.
Per coaches instructions you relayed, I offer your daughter and you a different perspective. The “norm” is to check the runner back to occupied base preventing the run to score, then go after the best chance at an out at first.
As you explained, the runner “bolted” and your daughter made a “judgement call” by throwing home. Had the catcher held the ball, there’s no issue...
Out at the plate or out at first, the coaches instructions would have been met. Throw beat the runner! Your daughter did her job under the instructions given!
However, “coach” did not specifically “state/insist”, runner at third cannot score”! In the absence of this specificity, coach was clearly willing to concede a run scoring but “hoping” and I say, leaving the decision to chance...piss poor coaching decision IMHO.
Catcher dropped the ball, E-2! Error to the coach for not teaching, instructing and wrongly berating your daughter for making a judgement call based on the lack of coaching/instruction!
More troubling, coach grinding an axe even though the team won! Nudder example of coach being weak and out of place! Maybe coach had bad day, but the game is fun...allow the kids to enjoy the game, teach them the fundamentals and rejoice in developing their decision making processes.
It is only a game.
For someone who asked, there was 1 out, we were down 2-1, only the runner on third and one running to 1st. Getting the out at home would have set up the third out as a force at first or second with no run being scored.
Thanks :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.