Posted on 03/05/2012 7:03:16 PM PST by KansasGirl
There are several threads active. I’ve added the keyword “Fluketruthfile” to some of them.
Just as there are “obamatruthfile” threads.
Tags do more than just express a summary of an article and the feelings of the day.
Has she been on Bill Maher’s show yet?
>> The floosie supports fecal matters.
LOL
You are a liar. It’s that simple. You make the left look like they play fair.
Rush did 0% of what you accuse and, of course, you can’t prove otherwise.
Rush CLEARLY mentioned that “anyone” (never mentioned Fluke by name) who wanted someone else to pay for their sexual recreation was a slut and prostitute. They want to be paid to have sex.
Geez, does the English language confuse you?
I see the word “context” escapes you.
OK, I see your point.
“But it can’t be disputed that the way he made his point was what became the national topic of conversation rather than who this woman really is, and her real agenda.”
Fair enough, and I’m sure at this point Rush agrees - thus the apology.
The media - the MSM with no interest in the truth - was able to turn what he said into something else. That isn’t entirely unexpected,.
What frustrates me is that folks here on FR attack Rush for being mean to the ‘girl’, or suggest he could be sued for slander, when it was always obvious he did NOT believe she was having sex 3-6 times/day, 365 days/year!
That was why my daughter, hearing it on Rush 24/7 that night, started laughing...as soon as Rush started doing the math...”$1000/year, even at $1 per condom means...”
And my daughter started laughing, because she appreciated the absurdity of a woman needing $1000/year to prevent pregnancy. So if my 14 year old daughter could understand the point - which was that the woman told a blatant lie - then why are so many Freepers still saying Rush attacked the woman?
Yes, I understand that in a given paragraph, with no context, Rush ‘attacked’ the woman. But in the context of the discussion, it was obvious Rush was attacking her lies, and laughing at the idiot politicians who took her seriously.
"Rush CLEARLY mentioned that “anyone” (never mentioned Fluke by name) who wanted someone else to pay for their sexual recreation was a slut and prostitute."
From the transcript of the Rush Limbaugh show, February 29, 2012:
RUSH: What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex."
Here's the link to El-Rushmo's site and the transcript. I believe you'll find he mentioned her by name nine times in this segment. I started counting the number of times he mentioned her by name in the transcript from March 1, but got tired at nineteen and stopped. You're welcome to resume the count - because I think you're mistaken when you say I'm a liar and that Rush never mentioned Fluke by name. I'll give you a hint: Rush also mentioned her by name on March 2 and March 3.
Febraury 29: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/02/29/butt_sisters_are_safe_from_newt_and_rick
March 1: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/03/01/left_freaks_out_over_my_fluke_remarks
I'll be here if you want to address your claim that I'm "a liar, plain and simple," and that "Rush did 0%" of what i "accuse[d]."
I was wrong. Although Limbaugh talked about her for four days, the fourth day was the apology.
Somebody said I was a liar and that Limbaugh hadn't mentioned her by name a single time, so I pulled the transcripts (and he mentioned her by name plenty of times). On the fourth day, he merely apologized.
And I apologize. Limbaugh talked about her for four days, but only put false words in her mouth about her sex life for three of those days.
“Whoopi Goldberg spent the anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing INSISTING that it was all a hoax.”
Plus she does not believe that fire can melt steel. Uh, libard, how the heck do you think it is made?
RUSH: What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We're the pimps. (interruption) The johns? We would be the johns? No! We're not the johns. (interruption) Yeah, that's right. Pimp's not the right word. Okay, so she's not a slut. She's "round heeled." I take it back.
Wasn't one of the reasons you said I was a liar your statement that Rush "never mentioned Fluke by name"?
Why would I have kept posting more and more that didn't have her name in it? It's clear I was only making the point that you were wrong and he used her name.
Teamster power.
Yep, I was wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.