Why would anyone want to have Breightbart killed? Silly conspiracies theories.
12:58 of video... “Alan Colmes upon whose wit and intelligence no comment is required”
hah!
To Shelly Dankert I would say (using her own words): “That doesn’t mean it’s ‘OK’ for you to make and/or spread BASELESS ........... prognostications about the ultimate cause of his (Breitbart’s) death.......If.......you continue to spread the .............. theories about Andrew’s death, shame on you. Shame on you for spreading lies.”
Because that’s what she is doing when she essentially ASSUMES that he died of natural causes and self-righteously declares that anyone who harbors any suspicion whatsoever that there MAY be A POSSIBILITY of a non natural cause of death is a CONSPIRACY THEORIST and, by implication, a nut-case. I’m surprised she’s not out DEMANDING that the Los Angeles Medical Examiner cease and desist from carrying out an autopsy to determine the cause of death when it’s obvious to right thinking folks such as Miss Dankert that it’s due to natural causes.
I don’t know if Dankert was the person who posted the link to her blog here. If so, I would say that it is not good form to come here and, in effect, insult all FReepers who may have some suspicion.
As for me, I’m waiting for the medical examiner’s report.
I doubt if Andrew was assassinated. He wasn’t enough of a threat to them.
There’s no doubt whatsoever in my mind that that would take him out in a heartbeat if he had been.