Skip to comments.
Human brains unlikely to evolve into a 'supermind' as price to pay would be too high
University of Warwick ^
| December 7, 2011
Posted on 12/07/2011 8:37:47 AM PST by decimon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
1
posted on
12/07/2011 8:37:53 AM PST
by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv; neverdem; DvdMom; grey_whiskers; Ladysmith; Roos_Girl; Silentgypsy; conservative cat; ...
2
posted on
12/07/2011 8:39:14 AM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
One thing for sure. A university is the last place a supermind would be found anyway... lol
3
posted on
12/07/2011 8:39:55 AM PST
by
DonaldC
(A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
To: decimon
Says who?!?!?

Mark
4
posted on
12/07/2011 8:44:14 AM PST
by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
To: decimon
Well there are two possibilities,
Increase the density of brain cells while decreasing their energy usage, or graft technology into the brain.
5
posted on
12/07/2011 8:45:46 AM PST
by
GraceG
To: decimon
I have had the privilege of knowing two people with photographic memories. Admittedly a very small sample size, but both had head problems when it came to dealing with failure or rejection. They would brood on every minor mistake they made until it drove them into deep depression. Most of us lesser mortals just have a couple of drinks and get on with our lives. But neither of them could just let it go.
6
posted on
12/07/2011 8:46:49 AM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: decimon
these scientists must be democrats since they only believe in a limited brain. ie only one pie.
instead of, making more pie.
seems like a mere publish or perish whatever study.
7
posted on
12/07/2011 8:47:08 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: decimon
I think they're off base. The article speaks in terms of tradeoffs to cognitive "enhancement", specifically noting pharmacological supplementation. I don't think there is any reason to believe the human brain cannot develop into something more than it is. Considering the strides we have made in a few thousand years, to call the current stage of brain development a "sweet spot" is a little narcissistic.
8
posted on
12/07/2011 8:47:22 AM PST
by
Mr. Bird
To: decimon
ANY study done by ‘psychologists’ is suspect from the gitgo. It’s like frikkin’ voodoo.
9
posted on
12/07/2011 8:47:22 AM PST
by
MestaMachine
(obama kills)
To: decimon
They broke the mold at Adam and Eve. Duh.
Every animal has “evolved” to it’s “sweet spot”. It may be because they were created that way. Just a thought...
10
posted on
12/07/2011 8:49:33 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: decimon
11
posted on
12/07/2011 8:49:33 AM PST
by
frithguild
(Restricting access to capital - Liberalism: The sharpest tool of big business.)
To: decimon
Ignorance is bliss.
Liberalism is bliss ... at least in concept.
To: decimon
Like with engines, tuning for performance means sacrifices in reliability and service intervals.
13
posted on
12/07/2011 8:50:13 AM PST
by
RitchieAprile
(Beck is on a tear again..)
To: frithguild
The monsters of the ID!
AHHHHHHHHH!!!!
14
posted on
12/07/2011 8:51:23 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: frithguild
15
posted on
12/07/2011 8:51:51 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: decimon
I was wondering about the inverse.
Given Obama’s displayed cretinism, should he not be built like a pro wrestler and have perfect health? (No insult intended to pro wrestlers, all of whom have done a lot more work and dedication to their jobs than has our Cretin-in-Chief. I respect them, I do not respect him.)
Given his mental handicap(s), it seems as if he’s been dealt a double bad blow.
And I cannot think of one who deserves it more.
16
posted on
12/07/2011 8:52:52 AM PST
by
Da Coyote
(Liberalism - when you absolutely, positively have no ability to produce wealth.)
To: decimon
If there was a "sweet spot" in the development of the human intellect, it was about 10,000 years ago or more.
It's been pretty much downhill since.
17
posted on
12/07/2011 8:53:58 AM PST
by
PENANCE
To: decimon
So...in other words....Zero really is a dumbass.
To: RitchieAprile
—Like with engines, tuning for performance means sacrifices in reliability and service intervals.—
To use the same analogy, I was told by someone here that the reason car engined last so long nowadays is that all engines are the equivalent of what, in the 60’s we called “blueprinted”.
IOW, man was designed as a very high performance container for our souls and the design can not be improved upon. Or at least it was designed so it could not be improved upon.
I sometimes wonder how the four chamber heart came about and what a stroke of genius. ;-)
19
posted on
12/07/2011 8:55:59 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: decimon
Simply put: The brain is a receptacle, then a processor and finally a delivery system.
It has a limited life cycle - not dependent upon what is deposited - but what is useful to its host’s survival - the physical body.
Early man had to process far more information for survival than modern man. So no, the brain is not evolving - it is adjusting.
20
posted on
12/07/2011 8:57:11 AM PST
by
sodpoodle
( Newter the Democrats and newtralize the RINOS - the Senate, House & WHouse)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson