Click the Pic Thank you, JoeProBono
Gary Hopes for Yellow in Our Near Future
Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!
Abolish FReepathons
Go Monthly
If every FReeper and Lurker gave just $7 a month
No More FReepathons!
Posted on 10/28/2011 10:59:24 PM PDT by Kevmo
a typo is a typo
I’ve seen our technicians do some doozies like that.
Without noticing or correcting it before public release?
Without noticing or correcting it before public release?
***I’ve seen technicians refuse to correct their typo mistakes. Not noticing is par for the course, especially if the time between notation and publication is so short. In the electronics industry, some typos survive for years.
Interesting. If the 'kg' was a typo, then they used 1.5 grams of H2 for the 1MW test. That was EXACTLY the same amount they used for the 10/6 test which was 100x smaller in output. Since the 'reactors' are the same this means that H2 charge amount has nothing to do with power output. How do they control the power output?
Mountain. Molehill. Giving up on you. You know the rest. T4BTT
NewinTexsas, stop trying to use your crazy logic and stuff on Kevmo! Don’t you understand how free energy works? </sarc>
If there is some way of debating FReepers in a legitimate fashion, I’m all for it.
I have pointed out dozens of logical fallacies coming from the seagull brigade. Those posts are not pulled.
In a court of law, when a lawyer uses too many fallacies he can get fined, removed, held in contempt, all kinds of things. But here, the logical fallacies are allowed to remain as well as other troll tactics which poison the well of legitimate discussion.
Actually, I’d like to hear you address NewinTexas’ comment.
I’m still waiting for you to tell the class if you think that buying a “degree” from a diploma mill is acceptable to you. Apparently it is, because that’s what Rossi did, and you defend the guy to the death.
Hard to debate when your typical response to my points is that I am making a mountain out of a molehill or that it isn't worth the keystrokes to respond. Thank you.
“I’m still waiting for you to tell the class if you think that buying a “degree” from a diploma mill is acceptable to you. Apparently it is, because that’s what Rossi did, and you defend the guy to the death.”
If the institution that awarded you the fake diploma is shut down for fraud, is it still morally acceptable to advertize that degree?
Just look at your posts that led up to that response and everyone will see why I’m done with you.
T4BTT
I’m still waiting for you to tell the class if you think that buying a “degree” from a diploma mill is acceptable to you.
***I had a boss once with a degree like that. It didn’t . stop his boss from hiring him, and if I would have told him off I’d have been out of a job. No I do not think it is acceptable. It is just one data point among many. Oh, and I already addressed this on an earlier thread. If it weren’t for the seagull brigade we could have a good FAQ for FReepers to get acknowledged facts, but the seagulls cannot be trusted not to do their ‘business’ on such a thread. We’ve even had parallel threads, but the seagulls come over to ours rather than stay on their own.
Apparently it is, because that’s what Rossi did, and you defend the guy to the death.
***Wrong again. I’ve said stuff like Rossi sucks at giving demos. I was the one who posted the Petroldragon thread, and it was the seagulls who had a problem with that information.
It’s one GIANT data point “among many,” as you put it.
If you are willing to falsify your academic credentials, what else are you willing to falsify?
Open your damned eyes.
It’s one GIANT data point “among many,” as you put it.
If you are willing to falsify your academic credentials, what else are you willing to falsify?
Open your damned eyes.
Another GIANT datapoint, “among many” is the Heat After Death events that Rossi has demonstrated.
Another is the Nobel Prize winning Physicist who went to bat for his technology.
Another is the 14,700 times the P-F effect has been generated.
Another is the LENR results that Focardi generated before his partnership with Rossi. Then, of course, there are the much more readily generated results afterwards.
If you are willing to look at data points, eventually one set of data overwhelms the other.
Demonstrated but not proven ...
Another is the Nobel Prize winning Physicist who went to bat for his technology.
Another Nobel Prize winning Physicist proclaimed energy from fusion in 1958. He later had to admit he was 'mistaken'.
Another is the 14,700 times the P-F effect has been generated.
P-F have been totally discredited.
Another is the LENR results that Focardi generated before his partnership with Rossi. Then, of course, there are the much more readily generated results afterwards.
What happened between Focardi's 1995 discovery and his union with Rossi? Why is Rossi now proclaiming that he discovered the process?
If you are willing to look at data points, eventually one set of data overwhelms the other.
If you are willing to overlook common sense, decent engineering, the fact that Rossi is a three-time scammer and if you either want to believe or have a vested interest ...
How much money does your physicist make in the homeopathic medicine arena?
It gets better every day. Thanks to Kevmo, I found out that his Nobel Prize winning physicist that is supporting the e-cat scam is also a big time supporter of the homeopathic medicine scam!
Demonstrated but not proven ...
***Then it is a data point.
Another Nobel Prize winning Physicist proclaimed
***Then you do not dispute the fact on the ground
P-F have been totally discredited.
***Opinion
What happened between Focardi’s 1995 discovery and his union with Rossi?
***Asking a question about a history lesson does not dispute the fact on the ground.
Why is Rossi now proclaiming that he discovered the process?
***He is not.
If you are willing to overlook common sense, decent engineering, the fact that Rossi is a three-time scammer and if you either want to believe or have a vested interest ...
***Just a casual glance at your responses shows that
you are not willing to accept facts on the ground. You seem to have a tremendous need to distort, obfuscate, and on many occasions, use classic fallacies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.