Click the Pic Thank you, JoeProBono
Gary Does Really Well with His Kids One-on-One
Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!
Abolish FReepathons
Go Monthly
If every FReeper and Lurker gave just $7 a month
No More FReepathons!
Posted on 10/28/2011 10:59:24 PM PDT by Kevmo
>> “The problem with people from universities like Stanford is that they are mostly unable or unwilling to think out side the box.” <<
.
If they dare, they lose their key to the club washroom.
As far as I can see, the only process Rossi has developed is for extraction of funds from investors’ wallets.
standard trolling tactics
Ignore the scientific evidence, focus on the troubled past.
standard wide-eyed gullible rube tactics
Ignore the troubled past, focus on the hype.
I have not ignored the troubled past and I have ignored the hype. I posted Rossi’s background — the squawkers had trouble with it, even though it was found on a website of one of Rossi’s Enemies. I have posted the “prove it’s a fraud” thread. You have done nothing of the sort.
But you are categorically incapable of getting past your emotional response to Rossi and look at the evidence.
He performs closed tests
***There sure have been a lot of people at these tests.
with shady protocols,
***Yup. Rossi sucks at giving demos.
speaks of mysterious buyers,
***and your point is...?
and refuses to answer questions
***that would give away proprietary secrets. My boss hates it when we do that.
or subject his method to peer review.
***Just plain wrong. Rossi gets criticized for not subjecting his method to peer review here, and UNO FLATU he is criticized for opening the Journal of Nuclear Physics when the ‘peers’ that he tried to publish with claimed his results were impossible.
“As far as I can see, the only process Rossi has developed is for extraction of funds from investors’ wallets.”
And whats wrong with that as long as it works... It’s “buyer beware” as usual. The buyer could hire you (na... probably someone like me to check it out for them. (I’m obliviously smarter))
If not, who cares?
hmmmm. Advancement of his scam?
At least if he had a real degree it would be one LESS scam he would have tried to pull ...
Obviously you’re just another clown here to add noise and dissuade people from getting informed.
Go back to the romper room.
Adhominem attack disqualifies you from any discussion.
You obviously have nothing else to offer.
Do YOU have a degree from a diploma mill? If not, why not? Do you see anything at ALL wrong with buying a fake degree?
Adhominem attack disqualifies you from any discussion.And then right above it is your post 290:You obviously have nothing else to offer.
Obviously you’re just another clown here to add noise and dissuade people from getting informed.Go back to the romper room.
A factual statement, based on his responses to me.
He contributes nothing but adhominem and noise; no facts whatsoever. Anyone not interested in the actual subject of the thread, that insists on taking up bandwidth with noise has no reason to be here.
The thread is not about his degree.
The thread is about his device.
We’re not here to put him up for any academic honors; were here to gather information specifically about the device and its function.
Good thing you aren’t here to put him up for any academic honors, because he doesn’t appear to be deserving of any.
Why don’t you go ahead and tell us what information you’ve gathered specifically about Rossi’s device and its function? Have you gathered any specific information which would explain why Rossi chose to leave a genset running and connected to his experiment throughout the entire test? Also, I’m curious why the title says that the test was successful, when if you accept the numbers put out by Rossi, the test only produced 47% of the power it was supposed to.
I think we have seen that logic is not the forte of the several Rossi cheerleaders whom post and sustain these threads.
Where is the logic in your adhominem diversion?
Smoke and diversion is for those admitting they have no other modus of attack.
You clearly have not read the report and are repeating other’s ignorant nonsense.
The report says that the output was looped back once it stabilized, so the generator was not in the circuit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.