Posted on 09/22/2011 9:27:22 PM PDT by dangus
And you are that because of Perry’s tightknit with the globalist....your state needs to wake up about where you’re gov. is taking you.
You spout baseless, unsupported bunk, meant to scare conspiracy theorists.
Texas would be 15th or 17th in the world if we were an independent nation. Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio, and many of our border crossings are healthy sites of international commerce - imports, exports and customs.
(Still not giving any proof about your false statement about 3%?)
Perry is a longtime, unwavering supporter of the NAFTA Superhighway and related infrastructure projects. These pave the way for theNorth American Union (NAU) proposal that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico. .
Gov. Perry gave a 2001 speech in Mexico, no less, saying he supported completely open borders, in which Perry called for... the “free flow of individuals between these two countries who want to work and want to be an asset to our country and to Mexico.” .......Apparently, there can never be too much immigration from Mexico for Gov. Perry.
Gov. Perry is against interior enforcement of our immigration laws. During the debate over Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration SB 1070, he opposed enacting something similar in his state, saying, “It would not be the right direction for Texas.”
The “Washington Watcher” at Vdare.com notes Gov. Perry has called for a “guest worker program that takes undocumented workers off the black market and legitimizes their economic contributions without providing them with citizenship status.” In other words, at a time when a record number of Americans are out of work, Gov. Perry’s job-creation plan is to make it easier for foreigners to take more of our jobs.
Gov. Perry “supports granting citizenship to children of illegal aliens, and opposes legislation to change the current policy which grants citizenship to any child of an illegal alien.” According to the Washington Post, he has said any change of our current birthright citizenship policies would be “unconstitutional.”
Gov. Rick Perry, who stated: “E-Verify would not make a hill of beans difference when it comes to what’s happening in America today.”
According to the AP, he talks of sending small teams of Texas Rangers to the border to halt drug trafficking, but the AP also notes that there are only 144 Texas Rangers in the whole state. And as Gov. Perry himself notes, there are 1,200 miles of border between Texas and Mexico that he’s happy to keep fenceless and unsecured.
Gov. Perry got $2 million in federal grants that were supposed to go to border sheriffs so they could place 200 cameras along the border. Somehow, few were ever built, and the ones that were built didn’t work.
According to the AP, the Texas Association of Business (TAB), which is one of Gov. Perry’s strong backers, adamantly opposes immigration control. “The economy would suffer without undocumented workers,” says TAB president Bill Hammad. “We need them.”
You might want to take a ride on the internet sites concernng Perry's globalist asperations for Texas...and moving stong across your state.
You can call all i post basless and unsupported all you want...that does not refute what's being stated and the facts which many are now writing about.
It is completley understood you absolutely support Perry...but you are so wrong to not vet him with the facts which are out there..rather you excuse and color the facts that:
-Texas, under Perry, has thousands of muslims infilitrating your state and that with Perrys invitation, support and recruitment to bring this about as they spread there islmic agenda throughout your state and their movement from there to other US states.
Further -Perry is for open borders to 'all' who will come as a means to further his gloabilist agenda to make Texas an international hub and a uniting of the North American nations...Canada, Usa and Mexico...as one.
_ Perry furthermore supports and works with Fox's plan for your nothern border uniting with Mexico's border as a community..and using tax payers money to facilitate this plan. Which includes insurance programs, resources shared, and a host of other free programs subsidised by American taxpayers.
and the list can go on and on.....
BTW,You do know that our border is a river, don’t you? If they can get across the Rio Grande, climbing a fence is no big deal. You might as well put a fence along the coastline in the Gulf of Mexico, too.
Governor Perry is not for a “fenceless” border, but for a fence in some places and not in others, where it does no good because it’s easily breached – even by girls: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHjKBjM1ngw&NR=1
In the Governor’s book, Fed Up!, he answers most of your questions, including the one about the Arizona bill – In Texas, we wouldn’t write the bill so that it puts our local law enforcement agencies and officers in danger of a new class of law suits:
I do have some concerns with the law, and I don’t believe it is necessarily the right approach for Texas, in part because of the new cause of action it provides against law enforcement. Having battled trial lawyers for decades, I am concerned about opening up the courthouse doors to additional lawsuits. But I strongly support the right of the citizens of Arizona, Texas, or any other state to pass laws to protect themselves. In fact, we joined in federal court with eight other states to help defend Arizona against the Obama administration’s lawsuit.
Perry, Rick (2010-11-15). Fed Up!: Our Fight to Save America from Washington (p. 161). Little, Brown and Company. Kindle Edition.
It’s a shame you’re too lazy to give links or full statements. Most of your half-truths come from this http://governor.state.tx.us/news/speech/10688/ 2001 speech – a speech made before September 2001, in a very different political climate. Nevertheless, the full, exact quotes mean the exact opposite from what you claim they do.
I've read the charge that NAFTA could "pave the way" to NAU, but it's not NAU and it hasn't done any such thing in the many years since we've signed that Treaty with Mexico and with Canada. It's an international treaty setting limits and requirements for trade - it allows trade with Canada as well as Mexico. It's no different than those International Airports or the Houston Port.
This speech calls on the US to honor the treaty that we signed, including the provision that “Mexican trucks that meet our safety standards should be given the same access to U.S. roads as our Canadian neighbors to the north.”
The Governor never said he supported completely open borders and guest workers, much less "free flow" is not the same as immigration. I visited the British Virgin Islands this year, but I didn't immigrate.
In every part of the speech, he lays responsibility on Mexico to “. . . work together to solve the challenges we both face”
Take a look at the paragraph that supposedly supports open borders, and the conditions the Governor lays down:
“President Fox’s vision for an open border is a vision I embrace, as long as we demonstrate the will to address the obstacles to it. An open border means poverty has given way to opportunity, and Mexico’s citizens do not feel compelled to cross the border to find that opportunity. It means we have addressed pollution concerns, made substantial progress in stopping the spread of disease, and rid our crossings of illicit drug smuggling activity. Clearly we have a long way to go in addressing those issues. At the same time we must continue to deepen our economic ties, expanding opportunities for Mexican and U.S. companies to do business on both sides of the border. The outlook is promising, even if the road to prosperity is a long one.”
As to the E-verify charge, here’s the full statement the Governor made:
“"E-Verify would not make a hill of beans' difference when it comes to what's happening in America today. You secure the border first, then you can talk about how to identify individuals in an immigration situation."”
The entire statement shows that the point the Governor made was that the first goal, if you want to protect the Nation from an invasion of illegal workers, should be to secure the border.
Look at the long discussion about e-verify, here .http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2010/feb/01/kay-bailey-hutchison/hutchison-says-texas-state-doesnt-use-e-verify-wee/ The comment was about whether Texas *State employees* were vetted by E-verify. It turns out that we use another verification system.
Hoc...you just don’t get it...what part of close the border do you not get? Arm the Border Patrol to shoot those who cross....not understood? Just these two alone would curtail dramatically the influx. Perry said he is for an “Open” border” dangling carrot ‘If’s” doesn’t erase or justify the fact he wants an open border. And he does NOT have to work with Mexico to stop the illegals , obvious his doing so hasn’t stopped the problem thus far.
No Mexican trucks on US highways! I don’t care what safety measures are required... Do you really believe Mexico drivers aren’t going to cash in on trafficking illegals in their rigs? They do it already.
A said before, you can frame Perry in whatever light you need to in order to keep supporting him...but i don’t buy it from the vast amount of information which opposes him as a conservative...let alone a Pres.
The “Border Patrol” is Federal, not State. Elect a guy like Governor Perry who has proven he’ll give the order to shoot (or shoot the bad guys, himself, when necessary).
If the Feds aren’t inspecting the trucks well enough to find illegal contraband and illegal people, then they aren’t inspecting the brakes, either. Maybe that’s why DPS sets up those check points a few miles in, you think?
As I said, the “if Mexico meets certain conditions” is a diplomatic way of saying “when hell freezes over.”
Nobody is trying to ban it. We just don't it mandated for little girls. A mandate that would likely make a billion dollars for Merck which has a long history of funding LEFTWING causes by the way. If you think the government has the right to force us to buy healthcare, then you must love Obamacare.
It should not be opt out, it should be opt in (going to court every 6 months to beg for permission is retarded)
It should not be opt out, it should be opt in (going to court every 6 months to beg for permission is retarded)
The same Legislature that decided to prevent the Gardasil mandate made all mandatory vaccines “opt out.” And it’s every 2 years, not six months.
Personally I’m not real thrilled with the way conservatives have treated Michele Bachmann.
I’ve seen a couple of threads attacking her for her comments on terrorism in Cuba. They accuse her of being stupid and repeating what she saw in the media or the Huffpo. The fact is that she’s a permanent member of the select committee on intelligence and might actually have information that doesn’t come from the media.
The simple fact is that this country won’t survive if conservatives don’t stand for what’s right all the time. Conservatives who aren’t willing to do that, may as well crawl back under the porch.
Of course you support the HPV vaccine, you make tons of money off of the degenerative conditions that it has been clearly shown to cause.
Healthwise, all vaccines are a net loser. All are loaded with deadly “side effects” that are far more prevalent than the intended effect.
The personal attack on me and the more general attack on medicine is unwarranted - and you can’t document that it’s at all true.
The reason that our life expectancy climbed into the upper 60’s back in the last half of the last century was due to childhood vaccinations, along with antibiotics, sulfa and penicillin. I’ve seen far more drug reactions from antibiotics than I’ve seen vaccination reactions.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005140.html
I’ll bet that everyone here over 50 knows someone who had polio. I’ve actually visited with one of the last Americans in an iron lung. And yet, we’ve nearly wiped out polio in the world.
Have you seen someone with blindness from measles? I have. I had measles and rubella, and have taken care of people who were blind and deaf due to these diseases, and heard women tell me about stillbirths, but have only seen one case in my 20 years of practice. A million people still die each year from measles around the world.
No one survived “lock jaw” or tetanus, until the mid-1990’s, when our ability to keep them alive on the ventilator and IV nutrition. And while it pops up here and there, I’ve never seen a case of tetanus.
The vaccine against a simple bacteria that is/was best known for causing ear infections was also the cause of the majority of bacterial meningitis. The vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) came out in the late ‘80’s, just as I was beginning medical school. I’ve never seen bacterial meningitis since I graduated residency (and left a tertiary medical center in San Antonio) in 1990.
Two years ago, I got my new Whooping Cough vaccination in September, just before we had an outbreak in our town. One lady I know had fractured ribs, and still has lung disease as a side effect of her whooping cough. My husband caught it and coughed for 3 months. For about a month, he would literally cough so hard that I’d bounce on my side of the king sized bed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.