Posted on 05/30/2011 11:56:31 AM PDT by Hebrews 11:6
Martinez has hit a two run homer in the game they’re playing now.
But you also got to wonder who is really calling the shots, it may be Nolan.
“Adrian Gonzalez of the Red Sox is hitting .329 and leads the league in RBIs at 45”
+1 on that AG is getting the job done AFTER getting the big payday.
I was just wondering, after losing both Gonzalez and Texeira, what the Rangers need to do to actually keep a good first-sacker.
OPS RC27
Ortiz .918 6.90
Young .878 6.47
That's not a good way to do it. This year's performance should be a factor, certainly, but 50+ games is not a big enough sample size. A true All-Star is someone who has done it in the past and is doing it again this year.
NL
C Molina (McCann)
1b Votto (Fielder)
2b Phillips (Weeks)
SS Reyes (Tulowitzki)
3b Polanco (Jones)
OF Holliday (Bruce)
OF Braun (Kemp)
OF Berkman (Ethier)
AL
C Martin (Avila)
1b Gonzalez (Cabrera)
2b Cano (Kendrick)
SS Cabrera (Peralta)
3b Rodriguez (Youkilis)
OF Bautista (Ellsbury)
OF Granderson (Quentin)
OF Joyce (Span)
But it's still early. I never vote for All-Stars until close to the deadline, which is a month away.
In the AL, Gonzalez overall is the best, at the plate and in the field (Cabrera is a butcher, defensively). Kendrick was having a good year, but he's on the DL, and Cano was superb last year and is good this year. Gordon, no, hasn't done much before, and is "OK" this year. Joyce hasn't done much before, either, but is *sizzling* this year.
For AL DH, I would pick Ortiz. Young might make my team as a DH/Utility.
It's a down year at a number of positions this year--slumps and injuries affecting a number of perennial stars.
ESPN is wrong. Martinez has caught several games.
Thanks for the correction. If it’s only “several,” I presume that’s hardly enough for All-Star qualification.
I don't know if it's one of the Top Ten most fruitful trades in the history of baseball, but it's got to rank up there.
That doesn’t always work. The Indians tried that years ago when they fired Mike Hargrove and replaced him with Charlie Manuel.
No way Miguel Cabrera over Adrian Gonzalez at first base. Not even a competition.
Superficially, Gonzalez's offense might appear superior--he has made a fine beginning in the AL. (I greatly appreciate him, having watched him carry the Padres for several years against my Dodgers.) Gonzalez's batting average is higher, .329-.311 as of today. He has more RBI, 46-40, but with two major advantages: 41 more at-bats, and he has Boston's superior lineup to drive in. And, Gonzalez had no off-season DUIs.
But overall, in 2011, Cabrera is outhitting Gonzalez by a huge margin, which is all I claimed. Despite Gonzalez's higher average, Cabrera has an enormous advantage in on-base percentage, .432-.377--Cabrera walks more than twice as often, making himself a potential run-scorer, while Gonzalez seldom does (Cabrera's BB=41, Gonzalez's BB=18); indeed, although he has 41 fewer at-bats, Cabrera has scored 40 runs to Gonzalez's 34 (this 6-run advantage exactly offsets Gonzalez's RBI advantage). And, also despite Gonzalez's higher average, Cabrera outslugs him, .568-.541.
Here are today's summary stats (ESPN.com):
OPS: Cabrera 1.001, Gonzalez .918, a 9% margin
RC27: Cabrera 8.97, Gonzalez 6.82, a 32% margin (in an arguably more important measurement).
Both Texeira and Konerko compare favorably with Gonzalez on offense so far, with all three trailing Cabrera substantially. If you want to argue for Gonzalez other than by blustering, make your case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.