Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Population genetics reveals shared ancestries
Harvard Medical School ^ | May 24, 2011 | Unknown

Posted on 05/24/2011 1:06:30 PM PDT by decimon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: AdmSmith; agrace; AnalogReigns; Cacique; caryatid; Celtjew Libertarian; CobaltBlue; ...
Genetic
Genealogy
>> PING <<
Send FReepmail if you want on/off GGP list
Marty = Paternal Haplogroup O(2?)(M175)
Maternal Haplogroup H
GG LINKS:
African Ancestry
DNAPrint Genomics
FamilyTree DNA
GeneTree
Int'l Society of Genetic Genealogy
mitosearch
Nat'l Geographic Genographic Project
Oxford Ancestors
RelativeGenetics
Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation
Trace Genetics
ybase
ysearch
The List of Ping Lists

21 posted on 05/24/2011 3:58:06 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


The helixmakemineadouble keyword:
22 posted on 05/24/2011 4:19:18 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanLM

***Languages mark who was in charge at the time.***

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Churchills-History-of-the-English-Speaking-Peoples/Winston-S-Churchill/e/9781566198134

You betchyah!!


23 posted on 05/24/2011 4:36:50 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Is it 2012 yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Communication defines us - so an enduring, dominant language is in fact ‘the coin of the realm’.


24 posted on 05/24/2011 4:41:51 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Is it 2012 yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

One of my premier dictionaries had a flow chart of all the World’s languages - showing the fusion of one into another. Fascinating.

Then I lost it!!!!!


25 posted on 05/24/2011 4:44:52 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Is it 2012 yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Trying to discover the origins of a beach by examining a single grain of sand would produce some result....but the wrong one in every case.

Consider this; genetic alterations can take place in a species over the lifetime of the individual, due to environment, diet, stress and most likely half a dozen other factors we can't yet fathom. Analyzing genetic information from the past and extrapolating it into theory in present is a worthless endeavor.

Toss out linguistic analysis too. It tries hard to be objective but ends up in the same subjective dilemma as all history depending on the current state of affairs and prejudices. The study of languages and language change, while it retains some of the syntax, some of the phonemes and a bit of a historical record of people, its bases are generational or epochal and fleeting.

All languages were pidgin at some time until they became official and noble....and then degraded back to pidgin.


26 posted on 05/24/2011 4:48:45 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
All it really shows is that the fallacies of 'begging the question' and 'affirming the consequent' have dominated the discipline formerly known as science.

Here's a line I just happened to have read, and underlined, about one hour ago.

It was the greatest sensation of existence: not to trust, but to know.

27 posted on 05/24/2011 4:51:29 PM PDT by OldNavyVet (One trillion days, at 365 days per year, is 2,739,726,027 years ... almost 3 billion years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Not at all surprising. I have one relative and one friend who look like they could be sisters. They both have the same tan skin, the same long beautiful brown ringlety hair. Their facial features are rounded, they have full lips. They are both quite pretty. One is of Jewish ancestry, the other has a black dad and white mom.


28 posted on 05/24/2011 4:52:59 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
It is thought that the reason the “Indo-European” languages spread from India to Ireland was that the warlike chariot driving sheep herding people were among the first to use mounted men (and chariots) in warfare successfully.

We know they drove chariots rode horses and herded sheep because the words involved are all basically the same in all Indo-European languages.

29 posted on 05/24/2011 5:19:11 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet
"Here's a line I just happened to have read, and underlined, about one hour ago."

"It was the greatest sensation of existence: not to trust, but to know."

Followed by "Do they call it a low, animal joy -- this feeling that I would not care if the rail did break to bits under us now -- it won't -- but I wouldn't care, because I have experienced this? A low, physical, material, degrading pleasure of the body?"

and

"Their soul is in every man who has the capacity to equal this achievement. Should the soul vanish from the earth, the motors would stop, because that is the power which keeps them going..."

Such is the 'power' of fallacy. One thinks something is 'known' when it is not known at all.

30 posted on 05/25/2011 6:27:21 AM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
I think language is an interesting parallel to evolution.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Language has an interesting parallel to **micro** evolution.

I find it interesting the most compelling arguments against macro-evolution are coming from mathematicians and statisticians.

31 posted on 05/25/2011 6:38:41 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
The only ones pushing such arguments are cranks far removed from Science.

Amazing how much creationist rely upon lawyers mathematicians and statisticians to comment on a subject none of them even understands.

Population genetics among all humans show the same markers of common descent in miniature that we see between humans and all other primates.

You can deny it until you are blue in the face - but it doesn't help matters much that you have no clue at all what those markers are and what they mean.

The same method to determine that Amerindians are more closely related to Siberian Asians than any other human population are the exact same method that shows that humans are more closely related to chimpanzees (and chimpanzees are more closely related to humans) than either is to any other primate.

32 posted on 05/25/2011 6:45:57 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Mathematics and statistics are the foundation of all serious science and research. Gee! I thought you would know that.

You should also know the difference between micro-evolution and macro-evolution.

33 posted on 05/25/2011 8:28:47 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
Good catch!

But ...

Such is the 'power' of fallacy. One thinks something is 'known' when it is not known at all.

How do you know that?

34 posted on 05/25/2011 8:51:48 AM PDT by OldNavyVet (One trillion days, at 365 days per year, is 2,739,726,027 years ... almost 3 billion years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet
"How do you know that?"

Are you trying to use the "Who is to say" fallacy?

35 posted on 05/25/2011 9:15:24 AM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Mathematicians and statisticians have no particular knowledge or insight into biological evolution - neither do lawyers. Yet creationists seem to rely upon them almost exclusively.

There is no mechanistic difference between the evolution we see within a single species - and the evolution we see that creates different species from a common ancestor.

The same markers we see showing the common ancestry of all dogs and wolves and the same markers we see showing the common ancestry of primates and humans.

You can say it isn't so all you want - but it would help if you knew and understood what those markers are. You don't.

36 posted on 05/25/2011 9:39:57 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
They also had telephones--the word for "telephone" is almost identical in most Indo-European languages.

Seriously, Indo-European linguistics is fascinating--a lot can be learned about the "Proto-Indo-Europeans" from studying the words inherited by the daughter languages. There are sometimes striking similarities in inherited words and customs as far apart as India, Italy, and Ireland.

They do seem to have been very warlike--"to live by war and plunder is of all things most glorious" as Herodotus said of the Thracians (Indo-European-speakers).

37 posted on 05/25/2011 10:57:18 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
Regarding your "fallacy" assertions ...

Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive

Sir Walter Scott

38 posted on 05/25/2011 11:01:30 AM PDT by OldNavyVet (One trillion days, at 365 days per year, is 2,739,726,027 years ... almost 3 billion years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Yes, but they most certainly didn't have a written language or books. ;)

In the modern world things are invented and the name for it spreads with the invention.

In the ancient world things were often independently discovered or developed - and thus different words were used to describe them (books, letters, etc).

I sometimes joke to anyone who tells me they are “Persian” that I am a “Thracian” or “Sarmatian” - usually they don't get the joke.

39 posted on 05/25/2011 11:01:42 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
One language borrowing words from another ("loanwords") is a very old practice. The Greek language has a lot of words that the earliest Greek-speaking inhabitants of Greece took over from an earlier language. The Anglo-Saxon words for "wine" and "cheese" come from Latin (before they came into contact with the Romans they didn't have wine & cheese parties, just beer blasts).

Finnish, Estonian, and Hungarian are not "Indo-European" languages but belong to the "Finno-Ugric" family--their words for "100" are of Indo-European origin. The Hungarian words for Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and Saturday come from a Slavic language. The English colonists of Virginia took the words for "tomahawk," "mocassin," and "opossum" from the local Indians.

40 posted on 05/25/2011 11:28:36 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson