Skip to comments.
Astronomy Picture of the Day -- The Last Launch of Space Shuttle Endeavour
NASA ^
| May 18, 2011
| (see photo credit)
Posted on 05/18/2011 4:23:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: SunkenCiv
The Last Launch of Space Shuttle EndeavourThe Last Launch of Space Shuttle Endeavour Oh Boy!
I can't wait to what the "next generation" version of the shuttle looks like.
< /sarc >
21
posted on
05/18/2011 6:34:28 PM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month...April.)
To: BrewingFrog
It must be remembered that Shuttle payload and optimum flight profile were not built around where the ISS is orbiting. Bad Bill clinton had his own Russian Outreach Program that put the ISS in a waaay northern orbit that cut Shuttle payload by something like 1/3 to 1/2. Typical dumbass Bill clinton diplomacy. The Russian orbit ticks me off on what should have been space station Freedom. But are you sure about the payload? I'm pretty sure NASA designed a lighter external tank and upgraded the main engines.
For the single thing that actually was a went-as-designed mission and piece of hardware, theres Hubble.
What about the mirror problem? It stinks that the Hubble will probably end up being burnt in the atmosphere rather than retrieved and put in a museum.
22
posted on
05/18/2011 6:40:40 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: SunkenCiv
The Endeavour will deliver to the ISS, among other things, an ambitious detector called the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer 2 (AMS), I hope the AMS does well. It could make up some for us not building a better particle collider, and be the first worthwhile project for the ISS, other than making work for the Shuttle, and sucking up limited funds that could have been put to better use.
23
posted on
05/18/2011 6:43:03 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: SunkenCiv
The scene in Apollo 13 where someone asks Hanks (playing Jim Lovell) why the Apollo program continued to be funded after the US had beaten the Russians to the Moon is out of the whole cloth of the time. And LBJs both-feet-blindfolded jump into Vietnam led to outright hostility (particularly among the beneficiaries of the so-called Great Society programs) toward not just Vietnam, but also programs like Apollo. Probably a web search would turn up Ralph Abernathys anti-US remarks made right after hed witnessed one of the Apollo launches. What I've read is that Nixon hated the space program. He ended Apollo and greatly comprised the Shuttle program with budget cutbacks.
24
posted on
05/18/2011 6:50:26 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: SunkenCiv
Under Eisenhower, the DoD dropped the F-1 as superfluous, but von Braun was developing it for a future moonshot, and took it with him to NACA, which became NASA. Big booster designs using one, two, three, four, and five F-1 engines were drafted by and/or for von Braun to pitch, and when JFK got pissed off about the seeming superiority of the Soviet space program, von Braun took his F-1 right to the head of the class. The Apollo program started under Eisenhower. JFK gets way too much credit.

This picture was taken in 1960. While those aren't F1's, that is a Saturn booster.
25
posted on
05/18/2011 6:59:00 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
JFK gets way too much credit. The MSM were just as Democrat back then, weren't they?
To: Moonman62
27
posted on
05/18/2011 7:20:58 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
To: cripplecreek
28
posted on
05/18/2011 7:22:57 PM PDT
by
Pelham
(Islam, mortal enemy of the free world)
To: Moonman62
Thanks!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13411163
[snip] There will, however, be a group of British engineers for whom Monday’s lift-off was a bitter-sweet moment. These are the people whose technology got dropped from AMS in the year before launch. [/snip]
29
posted on
05/18/2011 7:25:12 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
To: Pelham
Im voting for you.
You're the second person to say that today but the first one mumbled something about Robespierre and headed off to hide in their basement for the duration of my reign. LOL
30
posted on
05/18/2011 7:48:20 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: Jack Hydrazine
you know that is just plain wrong, the shuttle has not be used for ISS crew transfres in a while now, iss crews are launched on the Soyuz for the last 4 yrs or so
31
posted on
05/18/2011 10:05:35 PM PDT
by
markman46
(engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
To: markman46
Why would you want to spend $40 million per astronaut to ferry them to the ISS when you could spend a billion? Now that’s the American way!
32
posted on
05/18/2011 10:14:40 PM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson