Posted on 12/17/2010 10:14:54 AM PST by Sola Veritas
I agree -leaders lead! They do not hide and wait until the coast is clear...
BTW - dmz on your ping list has been spending the day say that this issue is unimportant because it doesn’t get Sarah and Mike Independent votes. You might want to examine why he is on your list to ping.
Why did you ping Jim, then?
And why are you an idiot?
Seek help at once.
“Why you ... come over here and call me that. I dare you.”
Threats of physical violence are supposed to be forbidden.
Here are my views of physical threats to my person. I am a “physically” peaceable individual. I try not to even use profanity. I would never physically attack anyone. However, should I be physically attacked, my first reaction would be to retreat if possible. However, should it not be possible, the person attacking had better intend and succeed in killing me....I will use any and all force necessary to fully and permanently eliminate a physical threat I cannot escape. So don’t make stupid threats. Even while in a foreign country.
“Why did you ping Jim, then?”
Because your responses are consistent with pro-homosexual/libertarian persons on this forum. Mr. Robinson has stated that “pro-homosexual” posts are not permitted. You should have just not posted to the thread. That you had to make derogulatory remarks is telling of your position on this issue.
By the way, now you are resorting to ad hominen attacks. Also forbidden on the forum.
“It is now officially (according to me!) that anyone who does not act and speak their conscience is a coward, and part of the problem.”
I fully agree, especially those that want my vote for POTUS.
Oh, and anyone that doesn’t think homosexuality has no place in the military and doesn’t clearly state so...they won’t get my future votes. I won’t compromize anymore to take the lesser of two evils. I will support a clearly and by actions social/moral conservative in the GOP primary. If one does not proceed to the general election...I won’t vote for the lesser of two evils anymore. If someone wants my vote, they had better come close to sharing my values.
Other than the homosexual agenda list, that’s pretty much it. The moral absolutes list is a lot longer. I could ping them too.
It’s amazing and extremely disheartening that almost no public figures are talking about this.
They should be SHOUTING about it!
Is everyone so terrified of a tiny handful of faggots? They’re between 1 to 2% of the population! It’s amazing. As though all public figures are neutered little bunny rabbits mesmerized by a cobra. ???
The days of “what they do in private doesn’t affect anyone” are SO OVER! Anyone who thinks that is part of the dam* problem. People who say “the “gay” (they always use “gay”) agenda doesn’t affect me” really mean “the faggot agenda is FINE with me and I support it”!
I’m beyond being tolerant, or nice. No more “homosexual” - they’re faggots! Homosexuals themselves, if they do not support the homosexual agenda ...(crickets of course) I am sorry for, hope they seek help. But those who are busy and driven to destroy the social fabric and morality and freedoms not just in the US but all over the world - are ENEMIES! And anyone who supports the homosexual agenda is an ENEMY! And anyone who tacitly supports it by silence - is turning into an ENEMY!
You are not worthy of a response, but there is nothing on television right now.
I plainly stated that I am against repealing don’t ask, don’t tell.
I then stated it’s not my top agenda item.
You are obsessed with it and misconstrued my position.
Do you even know what ad hominem means?
You are acting a little crazy and I simply suggested you get help before you do something stupid in the real world.
P.S. You have no sense of humor. I was joking about your coming over. I wouldn’t let a crazy person in.
And you called me assinine before I said one mean thing to you. And I still haven’t. Bless your heart.
Perhaps your time would be better spent, going on that thread and informing folks about John Bolton and his views on DADT and Gay marriage.
Just for the record, in case anyone thinks homosexuals won’t harm the military, or it’s no big deal, or that most of the people in the military are fine with open homosexuals, or just hasn’t read much about it, here’s enough info to convince anyone who isn’t pro-fag agenda:
Ten Reasons to Oppose an “LGBT Law” or Policy for the Military
The Center for Military Readiness ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608259/posts
Senate Testimony: European Militaries Are Not Role Models for U.S.
The Center for Military Readiness ^ | 3/22/2010
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608228/posts
Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High
FRC ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608306/posts
In Support the 1993 Law Stating that Homosexuals are not Eligible to Serve in the Military
CMR ^ | July 23, 2008 | Elaine Donnelly
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2608370/posts
“THE REAL PENTAGON POLL: 91% OF SERVICE MEMBERS REJECT HOMOSEXUAL LEADERS - 1 IN 4 WOULD QUIT”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2635458/posts
“MILITARY: Marines lead opposition to repeal of ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2635350/posts
“Mullen: Troops Who Balk at Change in Gay Service Policy Can Find Other Work”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2636350/posts
If you find that thread could you post a link and alert me? I posted on one thread about Bolton and his views but it was a few days ago.
It's...
Thank you.
DADT was implemented to passively homosexualize the armed forces. Supporting the status quo, which is what you are proposing that Palin and Huckabee publicly do, will simply put their stamp of approval on the current system which allows and encourages homosexuals to serve in the military.
BTW - dmz on your ping list has been spending the day say that this issue is unimportant because it doesn’t get Sarah and Mike Independent votes. You might want to examine why he is on your list to ping.
<><><><><
OK. You don’t care for my opinion. That’s fine.
So, Sola, tell me, what is your opinion on why Mike and Sarah are not beating this issue with a blunt object? You’ve stated that you think they should, you recognize that they are not, but you studiously avoid providing your opinion as to why. Why is that?
You are the one that raised this question. And yet you refuse to share your thoughts on the very question you raised.
I look forward to your thoughts.
“you recognize that they are not, but you studiously avoid providing your opinion as to why.”
Because why isn’t important. I’m interested in what the “should” do...I’ll leave the why to them.
Just so it’s clear to anyone reading this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2644629/posts?page=1#1
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you’ll get the zot from FR!
Jim Robinson
Posted on Saturday, December 18, 2010 11:33:01 AM by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you’ll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same “rights” as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don’t want it on FR and won’t have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don’t like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
“DADT was implemented to passively homosexualize the armed forces. Supporting the status quo, which is what you are proposing that Palin and Huckabee publicly do, will simply put their stamp of approval on the current system which allows and encourages homosexuals to serve in the military.”
Your logic is specious. Until it is possible to go back to a more correct system (no homosexulas period) DADT was better than nothing (DADT never allowed someone to engage in homosexual activity). Now thanks to thinking like your own, which IMO is pro-homosexual in a disingenuous and insidious form, the Senate voted today to repeal DADT and open the floodgates (Gates says the process will be slow but it won’t) to let occur to be seen horrors.
Politicians like Huckabee and Palin have been able to avoid facing an important moral conservative issue. Persons that both claim to hold high moral standards. I checked their facebook stuff today before deleted links to them...neither had said a thing. I won’t vote for either of them in a primary anymore because of what I consider to be a serious dereliction of duty.
I am thankful that Mr. Robinson has agains stated his opposition to the homosexual agenda. However, I think that persons like yourself are every bit as dangerous as the open posters promoting homosexualization of society. I’m not saying you are consciencely/intentionally pro-homosexual, but you are from a practical standpoint.
Remember this as this country continues to go down the sewer.
My posting history speaks for itself. I noticed you pinged Jim Rob. Are you hoping I'll get zotted?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.