Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this a time-traveller in a Charlie Chaplin film?
dailymail.co.uk ^ | 28th October 2010 | Niall Firth

Posted on 10/27/2010 7:45:00 PM PDT by Celtic Cross

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Celtic Cross

When I saw your post, I went back in time a few hours and put in a post, just to make sure that your post is time-paradoxed. It’s true!!!


21 posted on 10/27/2010 8:30:19 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wissa

Maybe it is a man


22 posted on 10/27/2010 8:31:37 PM PDT by Ladycalif ("If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one." Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: balch3
En zo, why would you EDIT OUT a child ~ well, this is Hollywood and there's a thing called "The Stuntman's Association. It's better than a union. If a stuntman appears in a stunt EVER then you have to pay him, even if the copyright has run out ~ they hire people to WATCH TV and GO TO MOVIES and RENT VIDEOS just to look for "stunt men".

So what you have is a child in a film, and the child grows up and joins the Stuntman's Association.

Obviously this was a "stunt" and not a dramatic part of the movie, so BINGO, every time that film is sold, or shown, the stuntman (the kid now grown up and beneficiary of the rules) gets paid.

I think it was something like $500 per showing.

So let's say you do an action film and the stuntmen do all the wet work ~ how do you advertise your movie with part of the action? Well, you reshoot it with people who are NOT stuntmen but instead actors, and make sure their actor's union dues are paid up lest even they sign up for the Stuntman's Association.

23 posted on 10/27/2010 8:43:19 PM PDT by muawiyah ("GIT OUT THE WAY" The Republicans are coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross
I think the ‘cell phone’ can be explained in any number of ways. What I find amazing is that they where able to get John D. Rockefeller to do a cameo walking by before the woman. Check out ht e video at the link. The similarity is uncanny.
24 posted on 10/27/2010 8:44:29 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

Why would one need the Siemens hearing aid while walking on the sidewalk?


In her case, so she can hear people talking about how she is very round and has large feet.


25 posted on 10/27/2010 8:56:07 PM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross

‘They’ do realize that this is a movie and not just random people walking along in front of the camera. Which would have been one of those big crankers. It’s not like they had street cameras.
I still maintain that he/she is holding the lapel of her coat up over her face. Maybe they got a guy dressed like a woman to walk through and didn’t want it to be obvious.

All this pulaver and they wonder how we ended up with Obama as President when people will believe they see a cell phone talking time traveler in a Chaplin movie. Oy.


26 posted on 10/27/2010 8:56:17 PM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross

Why does the zebra model change into an elephant?


27 posted on 10/27/2010 9:00:52 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross

Maybe she’s calling a friend as a reminder to watch President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s upcoming address on national television—the one Joe Biden described a few months ago.


28 posted on 10/27/2010 9:05:33 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

29 posted on 10/27/2010 9:18:39 PM PDT by Main Street (Stuck in traffic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Main Street

He sorta looks like Bruce Dern.


30 posted on 10/27/2010 9:20:04 PM PDT by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross

The funny thing is that most of the comments on the site are more concerned with the fact that there wouldn’t be a functioning cell tower then they are with the idea that this person is a time traveller! I say when we get time travel down, we just might have developed a better mobile phone system, ya think?


31 posted on 10/27/2010 9:33:26 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross
The answers is EASY! It's a Farnsworth Device!



http://warehouse13.wikia.com/wiki/Farnsworth

32 posted on 10/27/2010 9:35:53 PM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico

That’s right, technology exists in all times. It is not subject to the flow of time. Once created, like the universe it just is.


33 posted on 10/27/2010 10:13:17 PM PDT by runninglips (Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross
...Or maybe she was a maverick genius, secretly testing out advanced technology for the government...

Charlie Chapman was a genius. He could easily have thought of having someone pass through the scene with just a telephone handset.

34 posted on 10/28/2010 6:49:36 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross; Peanut Gallery

Its a communicator. She’s calling the Enterprise for beam up.


35 posted on 10/28/2010 6:57:42 AM PDT by Professional Engineer (Conservative States of America has a nice ring to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3
“someone on Fark.com posted a long explanation of this.She is using a hearing aid and speaking to a small child who appears in the original shot but has been edited out of later versions.”

Bingo. This guy just got world wide attention to his films and film festival. Marketing genius.

I remember reading a study that suggests that people who are lying can sometimes be detected by looking closely at mannerisms. The lying person's face is dead pan, while he or she will be fidgeting. This guy awkwardly scratches his head when he begins the story. He is lying.

http://www.blifaloo.com/info/lies.php

36 posted on 10/30/2010 8:06:45 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson