Posted on 09/27/2010 1:34:18 PM PDT by marbren
Thank you for the information that you shared...my interest is raised enough to look at Enoch and “test” it against the Scriptures.
Thank you and God bless
Lord willing and the Creek don’t rise up . . .
I do believe that the Holy Spirit will give us understanding of the reality around us through God’s Word if we will let Him
I agree . . . for those who are that far along in their walk and probably for a lot who aren’t.
I’ll stop there.
Am planning to post a bunch of gleanings from various sites this evening. THOSE WHO ARE SERIOUSLY INTERESTED MIGHT CHECK BACK TO THIS THREAD FOLLOWING THIS POST . . .
FIRST is a justifiably tweaky one noticing that the press was more interested in an Othuga party gate crasher than the startling revelations from Monday's National Press Club Conferenct. FROM:
http://www.ufocasebook.com/mag/100410.html
Published: September 29, 2010
By LBG1
National Security Threat? Only if the Salahi's sneaked on board a UFO and posted photos on Facebook
In case you missed it there was an live episode of the Twilight Zone at the National Press Club on Monday. An episode where retired Air Force personal held a press conference about UFO incidents they claimed they’d personally witnessed while serving in the military.
Another claim, the former military personnel were ordered by the government to keep silent about the UFO incidents. Incidents which the retired military servicemen claim involved the UFOs ability to neutralize U.S. and Russian nuclear missiles.
The plot of the Twilight Zone episode, retired Air Force personal muster up the courage to call a press conference in Washington, D.C., to reveal their personal experiences with UFOs while serving in the military and the government coverups of the incidents.
The press conference covered by the press with a startling lack of curiosity or desire to follow up on the retired Air Force servicemen’s claims.
Of far more interest to the press, last year’s White House ‘gatecrasher’ incident. D.C. society couple Michaele and Tareq Salahi managed to gain entrance to Obama’s first White House State Dinner without an invitation. Michaele and Tareq posted photos on Facebook of their encounter with Obama.
A Congressional hearing was called to find out how the wily couple managed to sneak in. The White House refused to testify at the Congressional hearing with the Salahi’s pleading the fifth. A story which got a lot of play in the press which was considered by members of Congress a matter of national security.
A report from CBS on the UFO conference included details about the participants at the conference and their claims. CBS’ ‘followup’ to the claims, a quote from a government official about the existence of UFOs and a reference to the Air Force’s now defunct ‘Project Blue Book’. The government official, Pentagon spokesperson Kenneth Bacon when Bacon was the Pentagon spokesperson in 1997.
CBS:
The U.S. Air Force ended its 22-year-long “Project Blue Book” investigation of UFO sightings after investigating 12,618 sightings; all but 701 were explained, and the reminder categorized as “unidentified” due to sketchy reports, a Pentagon spokesman said in 1997.
“We cannot substantiate the existence of UFOs, and we are not harboring the remains of UFOs,” said Pentagon spokesperson Kenneth Bacon in 1997. “I can’t be more clear about it than that.”
When you have to dig into the government response archives on UFOs going back to 1997 to publish your news report on a story which relates an incident, the UFO press conference, which occurred 13 years later, this leads readers to conclude the reporter and CBS were either incompetent or uninterested in following up with White House, the Pentagon, or the Air Force.
Kudos to CNN for airing the UFO press conference live.
ABC scored points for actually contacting the Air Force.
ABC News:
When contacted by ABC News, an Air Force spokeswoman declined to comment and pointed to the Air Force’s official position on UFOs outlined on its website.
According to that statement, after investigating UFOs from 1947 to 1969, the Air Force concluded that there was no evidence indicating that sightings considered “unidentified” were extraterrestrial in origin.
“No UFO reported, investigated and evaluated by the Air Force was ever an indication of threat to our national security,” the statement said. “There was no evidence submitted to or discovered by the Air Force that sightings categorized as “unidentified” represented technological developments or principles beyond the range of modern scientific knowledge.”
ABC published the official Air Force statement on UFOs, published on the Air Force’s website.
During Shepard Smith’s hour of FOX News, Smith, when reporting the UFO news conference, played creepy UFO music with the image of a ‘UFO’ on the TV screen. The amount of time spent on reporting the UFO conference, a couple of minutes.
The response from members of Congress? No calls for a hearing.
The response from the White House? In order to get a response someone from the press has to ask.
The response from the Air Force, read our webpage for our official non-statement.
My post, merely documentation of the reaction from the MSM, the non-reaction from the White House, Congress, and the military to the September 27, 2010, UFO Conference held by retired Air Force personnel who claim they personally witnessed UFO incidents.
Incidents which involved U.S. nuclear weapons. The claims the government ordered the personnel to keep quiet about the incidents
source & references:
http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2010/09/ufo-conference-at-national-press-club-twilight-zone-response-from-the-msm/
http://www.ufocasebook.com/2010/stockdaletxtwo.html
Published: 2:36 PM 9/21/2010
near Stockdale, Texas
Day two of spotting a UFO near Stockdale, Texas – We (myself, my son, and his younger step-brother and step-sister) parked our SUV approximately 2.5 miles (Texas 87/97 and County Road 538) Southwest of where we spotted the three-lighted triangle UFO the night before.
We set up four cameras (one VHS-C and three digitals) around the SUV. At exactly 9:03 PM we spotted what we believe to be the same triangle UFO as the night before. It was moving at the exact airspeed and flight path angel (from the Northwest to Southeast) as the night before.
However this time, the altitude was up to about 8,000 feet and it tracked about a 40 degree angle up from the horizon west from our location and the flight path was about 15 miles west from the night before.
My experience as a retired Army helicopter mechanic and weapons tech makes me feel that this is a drone. When my son said the UFO was zig-zagging coming down from the sky the night before, reminded me how the old line-of-sight, wire guided TOW missiles would zig-zag along its sighted path to its target.
This UFO looks and ‘feels’ like it is on a pre-calculated flight path using the earth magnetic fields as way-points and not land terrain or land marks as flight references.
It also reminds me of how ‘we’ would send spaceship or probes to other planets to map the terrain. In other words, it is either mapping the terrain or it is looking for any wreckage from the reported falling airliner, see MUFON report "Wingless, burning object falls from cloud near La Vernia, Texas."
Now here is the kicker, as soon as we spotted the UFO, two of the digital cameras locked up (froze). I never see the cameras do this before. The VHC-S camera could not get a focus on it, but we have audio. The JVC 1080 camera was the only one that worked but the quality is terrible (see added film).
I cannot say what caused the three cameras to go bad but this morning they are working just fine now.
I cannot make it back out there tonight for I have to work this weekend. It would be nice if someone could continue the watch tonight. Looking over the maps I predict if should track just southwest of Floresville, Texas, anywhere between 8:30 and 9:30PM. Maybe setup at 97 and CR 102 but this is just a guess, it could pop about anywhere or nowhere.
I put together a YouTube video explaining my 911 call and showing my drawings, map and videos of the third day we see a UFO near Stockdale, Texas. This is the link [link moved to additional evidence section/cms/tg]
I need more witness esto come forward so I can narrow down the crash site of the first event.
source & references:
Submitted through www.mufon.com
http://www.ufocasebook.com/2010/stockdaletxtwo.html
Published: 2:36 PM 9/21/2010
near Stockdale, Texas
Day two of spotting a UFO near Stockdale, Texas – We (myself, my son, and his younger step-brother and step-sister) parked our SUV approximately 2.5 miles (Texas 87/97 and County Road 538) Southwest of where we spotted the three-lighted triangle UFO the night before.
We set up four cameras (one VHS-C and three digitals) around the SUV. At exactly 9:03 PM we spotted what we believe to be the same triangle UFO as the night before. It was moving at the exact airspeed and flight path angel (from the Northwest to Southeast) as the night before.
However this time, the altitude was up to about 8,000 feet and it tracked about a 40 degree angle up from the horizon west from our location and the flight path was about 15 miles west from the night before.
My experience as a retired Army helicopter mechanic and weapons tech makes me feel that this is a drone. When my son said the UFO was zig-zagging coming down from the sky the night before, reminded me how the old line-of-sight, wire guided TOW missiles would zig-zag along its sighted path to its target.
This UFO looks and ‘feels’ like it is on a pre-calculated flight path using the earth magnetic fields as way-points and not land terrain or land marks as flight references.
It also reminds me of how ‘we’ would send spaceship or probes to other planets to map the terrain. In other words, it is either mapping the terrain or it is looking for any wreckage from the reported falling airliner, see MUFON report "Wingless, burning object falls from cloud near La Vernia, Texas."
Now here is the kicker, as soon as we spotted the UFO, two of the digital cameras locked up (froze). I never see the cameras do this before. The VHC-S camera could not get a focus on it, but we have audio. The JVC 1080 camera was the only one that worked but the quality is terrible (see added film).
I cannot say what caused the three cameras to go bad but this morning they are working just fine now.
I cannot make it back out there tonight for I have to work this weekend. It would be nice if someone could continue the watch tonight. Looking over the maps I predict if should track just southwest of Floresville, Texas, anywhere between 8:30 and 9:30PM. Maybe setup at 97 and CR 102 but this is just a guess, it could pop about anywhere or nowhere.
I put together a YouTube video explaining my 911 call and showing my drawings, map and videos of the third day we see a UFO near Stockdale, Texas. This is the link [link moved to additional evidence section/cms/tg]
I need more witness esto come forward so I can narrow down the crash site of the first event.
source & references:
Submitted through www.mufon.com
666
Perfect for the UFO screed.
Please post on the thread again when you have something
—useful
—informed
—accurate
—thoughtful
—constructive
to post.
.
.
.
BTW, could you shed any light on the rumor that the Vatican is working on producing a wafer with some anti-bitterness & anti-nastiness medication in it??? . . . it seems the white hankies are just not doing the job.
It’s so much fun when you are so
terminally
WRONG!
LOL.
http://www.cseti.org/press/pressrl5.htm
PRESS RELEASE - CSETI PROJECT STARLIGHT UPDATE
6 April 1998
CSETI Headquarters
For Immediate Release and Distribution
Dozens of New Top-Secret Government UFO Witnesses Identified One Year After CSETI DC Briefings
One year after the CSETI (Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence) briefings for members of Congress, White House staff and other government and military leaders, dozens of new, top-secret government UFO witnesses have come forward.
On April 9, 1997, CSETI convened extensive briefings for government and military leaders concerning the existence of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence. Nearly 30 congressional offices were represented at the briefings, which were held at the Georgetown Westin Hotel in Washington DC.
Since that date, dozens of never-before identified top-secret military and government witnesses have come forward, who are ready to testify before congressional hearings regarding unambiguous UFO-related events and projects which they have directly observed. This is in addition to the first-hand military witnesses who provided similar testimony at the closed-door briefings for government leaders last April.
At that time, CSETI Director Steven M. Greer M.D. asked that congress hold open hearings at which definitive evidence and military witness testimony could be presented. The assembled government leaders were told that in the post Cold War era, there was no reason for the continuation of blanket secrecy concerning the UFO / ETI issue and that the time for disclosure had come.
In the past year, Dr. Greer and other members of the CSETI Project Starlight disclosure coalition have met with various members of Congress, senior Pentagon officials and others to encourage an orderly open hearing process through which these historic disclosures can be made. Hundreds of people have called and written key congressional committee chairmen to recommend such hearings.
While CSETI continues to provide briefing materials and conduct meetings with various government leaders, as of this date no congressional committee or member of congress has agreed to hold the open public hearings.
CSETI leadership has been briefing world government and military leaders on this matter since the fall of 1993. This briefing process has included senior Clinton Administration officials, sitting CIA Director James Woolsey, former United Kingdom Ministry of Defense head and five star Admiral Lord Hill-Norton, then UN Secretary General Boutros Boutros Ghali and his wife, other senior UN officials, and numerous private briefings with members of Congress, among others.
While there has been keen interest in the subject and wide-spread support for disclosure, to date no official government body or leader has been willing to conduct open hearings to finally disclose the facts related to UFOs and Extraterrestrial Intelligence.
Ironically, most of these government leaders - who universally have been denied access to ultra-secret ‘black' projects dealing with the UFO matter- have recommended that Dr. Greer and the coalition of top-secret military whistle blowers step forward unilaterally and by-pass the government process altogether. Such advise has even been offered by sitting members of Congress and very senior Pentagon officials with the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
To this end, Dr. Greer and his advisors are making preparations so the top-secret government witnesses and other evidence related to UFOs can be disclosed in a privatized process which will by-pass the governmental bureaucracy. The privatization of the UFO disclosure process, while regrettable, also appears inevitable since Congress and other government leaders are apparently reluctant to expose these secret programs to public.
Dr. Greer stated " While an open congressional hearing on the UFO/ETI subject is still the preferred venue for a definitive disclosure on the subject, it appears that most government leaders cannot gain access to these so-called black projects, and therefore have been kept in the dark. And there appears to be an absence of courage and leadership in Washington at this time to convene open congressional hearings at which top-secret military whistle blowers could come forward. Regrettably, pro-active efforts to officially end the excessive secrecy surrounding the UFO subject have been met with inaction in congress and in the White House. After four and a half years of intensive briefings for world and national leaders by CSETI, it appears that a civilian effort to end this secrecy is our best hope in the near term."
Dr. Greer and others are planning a multi-media, coordinated release of evidence and top-secret government witness testimony in the relatively near future."
END PRESS RELEASE
[AND THIS RE THE BRIEFING OF WOOLSELY]
http://www.cseti.org/position/greer/cni2.htm
23 September 1999
Mr. Woolsey and the others question the accuracy (or manners) of my depiction of this meeting in the introduction of my new book "Extraterrestrial Intelligence: The Evidence and Implications". You can read this introduction on the website for yourself.
Mr. Woolsey et al have a very selective memory of this nearly 3 hour briefing of a sitting CIA Director. If anything, and my wife who was present can attest to this, my description of the meeting is incredibly understated.
In his letter, Mr. Woolsey (now apparently a lobbyist in Washington) implies that this was not a briefing but only a dinner party, and that the dinner party was not a cover story for the briefing, etc.
It must be understood that it was a friend of the CIA Director, Mr. Petersen - not myself - who characterized the dinner party as a cover story for the meeting with the CIA Director. Indeed, Mr. Petersen made the arrangements for this meeting and hosted it at his home in Arlington VA . He told me and my wife that even his wife did not know Mr. Woolsey was coming to their home for dinner until the morning of the briefing.
They claim my characterization and specific references describing the meeting were inaccurate. Not at all.
Quoting from a sensitive memo FedEx'ed to my home from Mr. Petersen, who made all of the arrangements with the CIA Director:
"I talked to Woolsey this morning and he (underlined in the original) suggested getting together over dinner. He was not aware of your organization or that anyone was planning such an announcement {regarding UFOs}. This almost certainly means that,
"If we do have dinner with Jim (Woolsey), we will have moved this whole thing to a much, much higher plane and in doing so raised significant red flags for those who don't want to see this succeed. Operation Starlight will become a serious (underlined) threat to the status quo."
"Meetings with people like Woolsey must be kept very closely guarded. I have not even told Diane {Mr. Petersen's wife/smg} about it."
"You must understand that great principalities and powers will oppose your plans..."
Then, all in bold: "Remember: the most powerful people in the world will have a deep, compelling interest in our activities and will use everything (in italics) at their disposal to effect their objectives."
And so forth.
Mr. Petersen, who heads up a national security think tank called The Arlington Institute, was working very closely with me during those days and had substantial experience in national security and military matters.
From the above quotes it is obvious that this was no mere dinner party! The dinner party was only the cover - and the stakes were and are every bit what Mr. Petersen describes.
As for other information contested in Mr. Woolsey's letter, I stand by the account. Regarding Mr. Woolsey's UFO sighting : This was first conveyed to me by his long-time friend Mr. Petersen and was later confirmed at the briefing.
In my new book, I reproduce the document handed to Mr. Woolsey during the briefing. In this document, which I handed personally to him, we recommend that Mr. Woolsey and the President move decisively towards a near-term disclosure of the UFO/ETI matter. Just a dinner party?
I am certain that Mr. Woolsey knew the UFOs were real and that a very deep cover project was running that area - a project which had kept the CIA Director himself in the dark.
Later in their letter, Mr. Woolsey et al complain that my conduct "contravenes ....simple manners". Manners? I was on Larry King Live over 9 months after the meeting with the CIA Director. But this meeting was not disclosed, because Mr. Woolsey was still in office and I felt decorum necessitated silence regarding such meetings. I have behaved with the utmost restraint and have disclosed such matters only after very careful consideration. Indeed, I would not be writing this letter except that Lindemann at CNI plans to publish Mr. Woolsey's 'sanitized ' account of the briefing and has compelled me to write. (Why Mr. Woolsey et al would make such a letter available to Lindemann is beyond me.) I made no pact of silence regarding such meetings. And since disclosing this meeting, I have always portrayed Mr. Woolsey and his wife as people seeking the truth of such matters and as people who wanted excessive secrecy ended. Perhaps I was wrong...
Manners? Indeed - if anything, perhaps I have been too restrained.
Good 'manners' as it pertains to this subject means speaking the truth - and being willing to stand up for it. Good manners would be public servants such as Mr. Woolsey, Dr. Woolsey and others doing the right thing and working ardently for the truth to be told regarding UFOs and ETI. Good manners should mean being more concerned for the health of our democracy and the Constitution than covering-up the import and purpose of such a briefing. And good manners would be joining in the effort to disclose a matter which, once made public, would allow earth-saving technologies to be revealed which would halt the wholesale destruction of our eco-system.
As a very busy emergency doctor in NC, with 4 young daughters, I assure you that we did not make that brief trip to Washington DC on December 13, 1993 to sight-see or just to have dinner. But rather, we made that journey to plead for the end of super-secret projects which are being withheld from the people so that our democracy could be made whole and our children's future made sustainable.
The current attempt to minimize, obfuscate or cover-up the purpose and details of this briefing with the CIA Director is quite disconcerting - and strange. Why Mr. Woolsey and the others would write such a letter is unknown to me. We can only speculate. I stand by my account. But now, perhaps the time has come for ''we the people' to demand that current and former officials such as CIA Director Woolsey and the President be held responsible for the the lack of action on resolving this most pressing problem. After all, we pay their salaries, provide their perks - and they represent us. It is not I who needs defense. My actions over these long years have spoken my commitment. But we still await action from our elected and appointed officials. As the earth groans under the weight of the errosive and corrupting influences of big money and special interests, I wonder just how much longer we shall have to wait...
I think it is time that the American people demand that the waiting time be over.
Steven M. Greer M.D.
CSETI Director
Albemarle County
Virginia
This letter may be reproduced but ONLY in its entirety.
©1999 Steven M. Greer M.D.
http://www.cseti.org/position/greer/comp.htm
By Steven M. Greer, M.D.
A comprehensive analysis of the UFO phenomenon, as well as original research and experiences of members of the CSETI CE-5 Initiative Working Group, has enabled us to make some specific conclusions about UFOs, Extraterrestrial Intelligence and their motives. The summation of this analysis, which follows, is intended to assist both groups and individuals in their efforts to understand this complex subject. We have recorded only those conclusions for which we have a high level of certainty.
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
Some UFOs are extraterrestrial spacecraft (ETS) which are piloted by extraterrestrial biological entities (EBEs) who originate on another planet, and most likely another star system.
More than one extraterrestrial civilization is represented in the current activities involving Earth.
These extraterrestrial civilizations are working in concert and not competitively, although there is some specialization in function and activities for the various groups. This indicates that there exists either an emerging or well established organization for these groups.
These beings have bases within this solar system and may maintain temporary bases on Earth, particularly under water.
While various reports and speculations exist, we cannot at this time definitely state which planets or star systems are the home systems for these beings. Any specific information on this subject is very likely to be incorrect due to the security considerations of these beings. That is, given human tendencies towards war, aggression and violence, open disclosure of their planets of origin would put these planets at potential risk should human military interests unravel the energy and propulsion technology of their craft.
The variety in sizes and shapes of ETs observed is due to:
a) varying civilizations of origin, and more importantly,
b) specialization of function, which include general reconnaissance, medical research, central command and base operations, energy generation and transfer, and human technology, military and space program research and reconnaissance.
Sudden and fully open contact with human civilization has been avoided because of a number of interrelated factors, including:
a) the need to avoid an untimely disruption of Earth civilization including military, political, geopolitical, cultural, economic, technological and religious upheaval;
b) risks to their own civilization and 'people', as well as overall mission, given human xenophobia and tendencies towards violent armed reactions.
c) up to this time, such massive and open contact has not been necessary, and has not been consonant with their overall long-term mission and purpose (see below "The Question of Intent"), since their purpose is not acquisition oriented or disruptive.
A plan is in place to allow for gradually broader and deeper contact with human society and individuals so that humans may become accustomed to the reality of other intelligent beings in the universe, and so that needed research and observation may take place on both sides. Limited but increasing opportunities for bilateral and human initiated contact will occur in the reasonably near future.
Sudden and large scale contact will occur only in the event of a significant world-wide emergency (man-made or natural).
While ETI observation and interaction with Earth is probably an ancient as opposed to purely modern phenomenon, the marked increase in activity coinciding with World War II and the dawning of the 'nuclear age' indicates that ETI are quite concerned about this transitional stage of human social evolution. They are particularly concerned about human nuclear weapons and technology and their potential for world-wide destruction, and possibly for their potential threat to ETI, although this is nominal. These beings are further concerned with our peaceful transition to a world society, international peace, and the establishment of a just, effective and representative world government, expected to occur within 10 to 15 years or less.
ETI technology is strictly guarded by both ETI and human governmental agencies because of its potential for military applications which would greatly threaten world security. It is imperative that this technology not found significant human applications until such time as the Earth attains international peace and an effective world government.
The US government, at least at the level of a highly compartmentalized above top secret group, has known about the reality of these ETS and their occupants since at least 1947. A strict secrecy and a world-wide cover-up of these facts have been maintained due to:
a) fear of public panic and social disruption
b) security issues surrounding possible military and technology applications of ETI technology, especially in the setting of a world beset with Cold War tensions and competing interests. c) uncertainty and mistrust regarding ETI motives and ultimate intentions.
d) embarrassment and consternation over human military inability to secure world air space from repeated penetrations by ETS
e) embarrassment and loss of face resulting from disclosures concerning how this matter has been handled, such as the harassment and ridicule of innocent civilians and military personnel, the withholding of information from the public and Congress, etc.
The US government possesses several ETS and the deceased bodies of several EBEs. While there is evidence to strongly suggest that these agencies are attempting to reverse-engineer these craft, such efforts have not been functionally successful, although a number of secondary and partial 'discoveries' have resulted from this research.
The nature or 'reality' of these craft and these beings has been incorrectly characterized by some as belonging to 'another dimension or reality' from this dimension. Unfortunately, these statements are made without fully considering what 'this reality' is. A more correct understanding of this is that the Full Spectrum of Reality is a singular, integrated one which may be perceived wholly or in its various aspects, such perception being entirely dependent on the level of consciousness of the perceiver. The various aspects or 'dimensions' of this reality, which are limitless in number, are not restricted to or by time and space as we know it commonly. These beings and their craft belong to the same Reality as humans, however their advancement in the realms of physical science and the science of consciousness has given them competence in a broader aspect of the Full Spectrum of Reality than is usually experienced by humans. The difference, then, is one of degree and not fundamental reality, since humans potentially have access to all aspects of the Full Spectrum of Reality just as extraterrestrial beings do. These differences are not insurmountable, nor are they truly fundamental; in fact they are relative and only temporary. While these beings are utilizing and experiencing a broader aspect of the Full Spectrum of Reality, so too can and will humans, for we are as 'inter-dimensional' by nature as they...
ETS energy and 'propulsion'(or space transfer) systems utilize principles and laws of the physical universe not yet fully appreciated by human science, and include:
a) gravity/anti-gravity and electromagnetic/gravity technology b) space energy and so-called hyperdimensional energy systems
c) matter-energy inter-changeable technologies
d) possible Consciousness Assisted Technology(CAT) and Technology Assisted Consciousness(TAC)
Some if not all EBEs have advanced mental capabilities which include telepathy, precognition, remote viewing and others, indicating that they have developed the 'science of consciousness' to a degree which parallels or surpasses their advanced physical technologies. Humans also possess these capabilities, but these remain largely undeveloped by most humans.
EBEs are more developed or advanced than humans in a number of respects, but are not superior to humans as beings. Our point of unity and equality with EBEs is in our mutual existence as conscious intelligent beings.
While these various EBEs may have values and priorities which are different from those of some 20th century humans, their motives and ultimate intentions are non-hostile and do not include the acquisition or subjugation of the Earth or its peoples (see below, "The Question of Intent").
The establishing of a lasting world peace and a just and effective world government is essential to the long term ETI-human relationship.
THE QUESTION OF INTENT
While not minimizing the strange and startling aspects of this phenomenon which some humans have experienced, our assessment of these visitors' motives and ultimate intentions, is that they are decidedly non-hostile. Their primary operations and activities center around:
General reconnaissance of Earth and her societies
Military(especially nuclear) observation and assessment
Human social and psychological study and observation
Human medical, physiological and genetic research and observation
Observation and assessment of human mental and spiritual development
Earth ecology research and documentation, including documentation of Earth life systems, and mineral, plant, and animal specimens
Observation of human technology and technological developments
Observation, active monitoring and if necessary limitation of human space programs, particularly those directed towards the nationalistic colonization of space
Close and active monitoring of international conflicts and international relations
Careful interaction with humans to convey certain information about themselves and to accustom humans to their presence
Our assessment is that these activities are derived from several ultimate motives, which include:
Pure study and research of a rapidly developing intelligent species(human) during a time of transition to a world community
A needed increase in ETI knowledge of world societies and human nature preparatory to future significant interaction, which will be mutual in nature, and which will eventually culminate in the introduction of Earth civilization into an inter-planetary network(this may require several centuries to complete)
Preparatory activities for continued readiness in the event that intervention is required during a major world emergency, such as a large scale nuclear war; such interventions would be in the protective form of -
a) interception and destruction of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs)
b) alteration of missile coordinates and readiness
c) emergency Earth based activities when and where warranted
The minimum intervention necessary would be used, with the intention being the preservation of Earth as an inhabitable planet with adequate human resources remaining to sustain intelligent life here.
Emergency intervention in the event of an environmental or geological catastrophe of world wide dimensions
Preservation of Earth species, including human genetic preservation and/or augmentation as a precaution in the event of a worst case scenario (see above).
Protection of space from hostile or military utilization by human national interests.
ETI self-protective interests, insofar as humans have a strong recent history of coupling marked aggressiveness with rapid technological development; in this setting, monitoring and perhaps even limiting human capabilities may be important to ETI security - Human evolution to world peace, non-aggression and a world government would remove this motive as well as several of the motives listed above
ETI short and long time goals related to the attainment of a significant human paradigm shift from one of fragmentation/separation to one of unity, to include the unity of science and religion, world political and eventual spiritual unity, and universal unity. This paradigm shift is dependent on the development of human consciousness, which is of particular interest to ETI.
The preservation and advancement of intelligent life in the universe.
STEVEN M. GREER, M.D.
© Copyright 1991
.
http://www.informantnews.com/starshipgamma/lunar/moon2.html
The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets." —Robert Jastrow, First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee
After hundreds of years of detailed observation and study, our closest companion in the vast universe, Earth’s moon, remains an enigma. Six moon landings and hundreds of experiments have resulted in more questions being asked than answered.
Among them:
1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.
.
2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.
.
3. Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with the moon. According to Wilson, "The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned." (Emphasis added).
.
4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.
.
5. Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. This could not have originated from a "close call" with Earth—such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.
.
6. No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.
.
7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria, "are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident."
(Emphasis added).
.
8. Seismic Activity: Hundreds of "moonquakes" are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.
.
9. Hollow Moon: The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere." Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity." MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field . . . indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow." In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."
.
10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even no—core.
.
11. Unusual Metals: The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 "Blackbird". Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as were rustproof iron particles.
.
12. Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where?). Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover "space dust" remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also.
Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow "captured" by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated, "It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible."
.
13. Weird Orbit: Our moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. "Something" had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.
.
14. Moon Diameter: How does one explain the "coincidence" that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, "There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."
.
15. Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as the Moon-Is-a-Spaceship Theory is, all of the above items are resolved if one assumes that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all of the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.
.
Greek authors Aristotle and Plutarch, and Roman authors Apolllonius Rhodius and Ovid all wrote of a group of people called the Proselenes who lived in the central mountainous area of Greece called Arcadia The Proselenes claimed title to this area because their forebears were there "before there was a moon in the heavens." This claim is substantiated by symbols on the wall of the Courtyard of Kalasasaya, near the city of Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, which record that the moon came into orbit around the Earth between 11,500 and 13, 000 years ago, long before recorded history.
.
1. Ages of Flashes: Aristarchus, Plato, Eratosthenes, Biela, Rabbi Levi, and Posidonius all reported anomalous lights on the moon. NASA, one year before the first lunar landing, reported 570+ lights and flashes were observed on the moon from 1540 to 1967.
.
2. Operation Moon Blink: NASA’s Operation Moon Blink detected 28 lunar events in a relatively short period of time.
.
3. Lunar Bridge: On July 29, 1953, John J. O’Neill observed a 12-mile-long bridge straddling the crater Mare Crisium. In August, British astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkens verified its presence, "It looks artificial. It’s almost incredible that such a thing could have been formed in the first instance, or if it was formed, could have lasted during the ages in which the moon has been in existence.
.
4. The Shard: The Shard, an obelisk-shaped object that towers 1½ miles from the Ukert area of the moon’s surface, was discovered by Orbiter 3 in 1968. Dr. Bruce Cornet, who studied the amazing photographs, stated, "No known natural process can explain such a structure."
.
5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.
.
6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall. ". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."
.
Don Ecker, Long Saga of Lunar Anomalies, UFO magazine, Vol. 10, Nol 2 (March/April 1995), p. 23.
.
Six Mysterious Statuesque Shadows Photographed on the Moon by Orbiter, The Washington Post, Nov. 22, 1966, p. 1.
.
http://www.informantnews.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=293
.
Ex High Clearance Gov. Spook Speaks to Informant News
Top Secrets Revealed by Informant News
By Informant News
I was recently contacted by an older gentleman around the age of 70 years old that had contacted me by my personal cell phone, which not a soul knows the number to except immediate family and friends. This gentleman told me he had information regarding secret technologies and Alien cooperation with various governments of the world. He wanted to meet in person and tell me of this information if I was willing. I asked how he had gotten this number and was told it was not important, but if I wanted to learn some of the secrets I had been seeking, he would be willing to share some inside information with me. I agreed, and I was immediately frightened to the bones.
I will now reveal some of the secrets he has told me when I met him in an isolated area in the Ozarks woods.
I pulled up to the agreed upon meeting area and found him sitting on the hood of his car smoking a cigarette. I’m not going to reveal the type of car he was driving, but I will say he was dressed in a gray suit and tie, with black polished shoes. He introduced himself as John, and that's all he would tell me of his name and said that is all I needed to know for both our safety. I’m sure that wasn’t even his real name.
He then informed me that he had been a reader of my site and was impressed by some of the material he'd seen there. He explained he was getting along in age, and didn't expect to live much longer and really didn't give a shit anymore anyway. His words. He said he liked the “Cut of my Gibâ€.
He also told me that the information he was about to give me is old information, but still highly classified.
He said he was a very high clearance agent for the government who had retired a little over 20 years ago. He didn’t mention any specific department, and I didn’t think to ask.
At the time he was employed by this agency, he said he had a license to kill, literally, he could kill anyone, at anytime, and no questions would be asked.
He said he would give me this information, but that I must realize that I would be jeopardizing my own safety and to use my own discretion whether or not to print or circulate this information. In other words, he’d tell me, but it would be my risk and decision whether or not to use it and make it public.
I will now pass on what this kind, but hard old gentleman told me.
1st, the SR 71 Blackbird, first flown in the early sixties for the most part and the top speed is still classified.
He told me the top speed of that bird is mach 14 and that is the main reason that one had never been shot down. He said there wasn’t a missile in the world that could catch that bird, but by the 70’s we had things that were even more advanced than the current B-2 and the F-117A Stealth Fighter.
He told me he had been to Groom lake and Area 51, was not allowed in many areas which were above even his clearance, but that back in the 70's he saw a plane there that would make the B-2 Stealth look like a toy, both in size and speed.
He then told me that the B-2 is an anti-gravity assist vehicle, and that this was highly classified.
He also said, though he saw no extraterrestrial vehicles, or entities, he saw technology as early as the early sixties that could have only have come from some sort of agreement between an alien race and ours, and also that some of his buddies had actually seen the extraterrestrial craft, technologies, and entities that were working with our own scientists as early as the mid to early 1950's. He told me of the story about the exchange of human abductees in order for corroboration and technology was true, and that it did indeed get out of hand, but the government in it’s greed for weapons and technology allowed it to continue anyway, and that it continues to this day. He said that the information he had gained about the experiments was not entirely to do with genetic experiments, but that he had learned that many children are and have been abducted for one certain species of the alien race purely for feeding and nutritional purposes, and that this was the biggest secret to be kept, but that he could not tell me more about this at this time. He again warned me if I were to tell of this, I could be in grave danger and I am frightened to say the least.
He said it was incredible to him that so many people could not to this day see the connection between the rapid growth of technology since the late 50's and early sixties to present day, and how fast in just a short amount of time we had come. He said it would be obvious to some, but most just take it as good ole American ingenuity.
He then told me that even 30 years ago, we had a laser type weapon, computer controlled, that could sense the firing of a Nuclear missile, or even a large cannon type weapon and in milliseconds, calculate for curvature of the Earth, and destroy the incoming before it even got a thousand feet away from it's firing point. But he said even to this day, they have not been allowed to use this and still keep this tech under wraps. He told me the amazing part was that this weapon could actually bend the light, or laser. He also confirmed that we have had technology capable of projecting holographic images in any area of the sky, and that they could project any thing they wanted people to see.
As we spoke, he reminded me of the Morley man on the x-files as he chained smoke the entire time of our conversation.
He said some of the insiders are just itching to use some of this weaponry, but are still under strict orders by the higher ups to keep everything under wraps.
We continued talking for about two hours in which time he told me some other secrets, which I will post in part two of this article soon. Including Aliens on the moon, the Apollo program, cloaking technology, sentry probes, invisibility and other weapons developed years ago that are still kept secret, and not used. Let's see if I survive long enough to do this first.
So, take it or leave it, this was a true conversation with a man that seemed to know more than the average Joe like me, and if he was pulling my leg, really had no reason to at all. This was a very serious, slightly frightening individual for me to encounter, but everything he told me had a ring of truth to it.
I would swear in any court of law that the story I tell is the absolute truth as I was told the information, and that it is recollected to the best of my ability.
Stay tuned for part two.
Please repost this in as many places as possible to help me get this out, but also to help insure my safety. This article is copyright material but may be used under the fair practice applications for non-profit only. To use this article, place the link that follows, and post the story in its entirety.
Copyright - Informant News - http://www.informantnews.com
Informant News
Copyright © by Informant News All Right Reserved.
Published on: 2006-01-17 (22202 reads)
from
http://www.ufocasebook.com/2009d/buffaloufo.html
YOU CAN WATCH THE VIDEO AT THE ABOVE LINK.
Published: 3:34 PM 11/2/2009
By BRIAN FLYNN
STUNNED Derek Bridges has revealed how he shot extraordinary footage which UFO experts say shows aliens beaming a BUFFALO into their spaceship.
Pensioner Derek filmed the eerie scene from his window after spotting pulsating glowing orbs hovering over a neighbouring farm late at night.
The two bright lights hover high over fields, while an animal appears to dangle below before vanishing into them. A high-pitched screeching noise can be heard before the UFOs finally disappear into the night.
Grandfather Derek, 69, said: "I couldn't believe my eyes. I'm convinced it is the real thing."
He told how he spotted the bizarre lights over a neighbouring farm as he looked out of his window while getting ready for bed at his house near Basingstoke, Hampshire.
Quick-thinking Derek grabbed his camcorder and began filming the incident above 2,500-acre Laverstoke Park Farm in Overton village at about 10.30pm. It has one of the country's biggest herds of water buffalo and is close to a military base used by special forces.
Derek said: "I just looked out of the window before going to bed. I wasn't sure what I was seeing at the time. I have a keen eye and I could see something glowing which looked dark red about half a mile away. I kept looking at it for about 20 minutes and then suddenly a bright white light appeared which was very powerful."
"At that point I picked up my video camera and filmed what I saw. I saw two white lights lifting up and I just kept filming. The lights were high in the sky. They couldn't have been anything on the ground. I did not realise at the time that something was dangling beneath but when I played it back the next day on a big screen I could see it there. "
"I believe it's a UFO and this animal, which could be a bison or a horse, seems to be being beamed up. "As far as I know, this is the first time anyone in the world has filmed animal abduction, so obviously I'm pretty chuffed."
UFO experts claim there is a long history of cattle being abducted by aliens for research, particularly in the US, sometimes being returned alive or mutilated. There are often reports of animal carcasses found lying in fields with body parts mysteriously missing and their blood drained without the skin being spilt.
Divorced Derek told how he spoke to a farm worker who said they had found a couple of dead animals around the time the lights were filmed.
The farm - owned by 1979 Formula 1 champ Jody Scheckter - insists no cattle have gone missing.
Boss Sara Whittall said: "We have never seen any aliens or UFOs around here. "All our animals have been accounted for, so we have not had any abductions either."
But the area is a hotspot for UFO sightings. In June last year, families in Basingstoke reported seeing a dozen glowing orange objects hovering in the sky above the town.
SunkenCiv ping . . . strange moon stuff
.
from:
By Alastair Jamieson
Published: 11:36AM BST 20 Oct 2009
The sergeant, who has not been named, was off-duty when he saw the figures standing in a field near Silbury Hill, and stopped his car to investigate.
However, as he approached the 'men' – all over 6ft tall with blond hair – he heard "the sound of static electricity" and the trio ran away ''faster than any man he had ever seen''.
The officer returned to his home in Marlborough, Wiltshire, and contacted paranormal experts and told them he had spotted a UFO.
Wiltshire Police has refused to comment on the incident, saying it is a ''personal matter'' for the officer involved.
Crop circle researcher Andrew Russell, who is investigating the bizarre sighting on behalf of the officer, described the moment his sighting was made.
He said: ''At first he thought they were forensic officers as they were dressed in white coveralls. He stopped his car and approached the field.
''The figures were all over 6ft and had blond hair. They seemed to be inspecting the crop. When he got to the edge of the field he heard what he believed to be a sound not dissimilar to static electricity.
''This crackling noise seemed to be running through the field and the crop was moving gently, close to where the noise was.
''He shouted to the figures who, at first, ignored him, not glancing at him. When he tried to enter the field they looked up and began running.
''He said; 'They ran faster than any man I have ever seen. I'm no slouch but they were moving so fast. I looked away for a second and when I looked back they were gone.
''I then got scared. The noise was still around but I got an uneasy feeling and headed for the car. For the rest of the day I had a pounding headache I couldn't shift.''
The bizarre incident occurred on the morning of July 6 this year as the police officer was driving.
The officer claims the three figures were examining a crop circle, which had appeared several days earlier, when he stopped his car and began walking towards them.
However, the mysterious beings disappeared when he ''looked away for a second'' and he contacted UFO experts after witnessing other paranormal activity.
A spokesman for Wiltshire Police said: ''The police officer was apparently off duty when this happened so we have no comment to make because it is a personal not a police matter.''
Crop circle expert Colin Andrews, who investigated the incident alongside Andrew Russell, said he is ''convinced'' by the police officer's story.
He said: ''I am quite convinced the officer had an experience that day and one that we have not fully explored.
''I think with the unusual movement of the being and the poltergeist experiences there is too much additional information to say that is something in nothing.''
[THERE are other interesting crop circle links at the above link]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.