Posted on 09/16/2010 3:35:58 AM PDT by decimon
Naw, I think you have to be in your dotage before you’re ready for AARP. You’re not even close.
That is nonsensical. The same laws of physics apply to a river in flood versus a trickling stream. You are completely misrepresenting science in your attempts to frame your own theories.
Evolutionists wrongly binned radioisotope decay as a sort of invariant natural law, which we now have seen is not the case.
You can't even frame the debate properly. Isotopic decay is a function of physics. And the age of the Earth has nothing to do with evolution per se.
You keep saying we don't believe in scientific method, but fail to cite an example.
Are you kidding me? I just did - the fact that your theories require several orders of magnitude in a change of the rate of decay for radioactive isotopes - when there is absolutely no science to support such a theory.
You may have the last word, debating young Earth creationists is as pointless as debating true believe AGW proponents, and for the exact same reasons - they start with a belief system and then create data and ignore facts to buttress that system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.