Posted on 06/29/2010 10:02:20 AM PDT by C19fan
No rebuttal, but wanted to change my taglin.
“That’s a bingo”
Isn't that already specified in the terms of the lease?
Isn’t what already specified in the lease? Can’t sublet? Yes, but it’s impossible to enforce. It’s not like the landlords are going to help enforce it — they’re not going to get paid any more than the government-decreed rental rate no matter what, and when tenants are having trouble making the rent payments (like now), it’s actually beneficial to the landlords to let this sort of arrangement proceed undisturbed.
When there’s an active, public market in “no-tel” rentals, it obviously greatly increases the amount of this going on, and the profitability. Easier to outlaw it completely.
Better yet, get rid of all the unConstitutional rent control laws, and let private property owners set their own rules re sublets. But of course, that’s far too radical a proposal for the NYC government to consider. Only tweaks to the socialist system are open for consideration.
On a related note, there’s also quite of bit of similar stuff going on in public housing projects, though obviously not as a susbtitute for real hotels. A friend of mine lived in such an arrangement briefly, where the apartment was officially leased to a welfare mother who supposedly had multiple children (including teens) living there, thus qualifying her for a huge apartment. But only two younger children actually lived there, and the woman (who obviously wasn’t paying a dime for the apartment in the first place) was renting out rooms at standard NYC rental rates. The welfare crowd is actually very pro-capitalism, as long as somebody gives them the capital for free.
Hundreds of New Yorkers, like others nationwide, have been making a few extra dollars by using sites such as AirBnB, Crashpadder, Roomorama, and Craigslist to sublet pullout sofas, living rooms, and whole apartments. But that may end soon. This week, New York state senators vote on a bill that would make it illegal for any homeowner or renter to sublet for less than a month. The new law would be a blanket ban on short-term rentals no matter how ethical the renter is. (It's always been illegal to violate co-op leases and condominium bylaws.)I'm sure this crackdown will be just as effective as the Rent Control Act. Abby Hoffman was living under an assumed name, on the run from various charges -- and yet managed to sublet his rent-controlled apartment all during his exile.
Too easy. Charge $200 or whatever a month, get the person’s name on a 30-day lease, they stay for a week and go home.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.