Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Moon Trips: Obama's Space Vision a 'Paradigm Shift'
space.com ^ | 01/28/10 | Clara Moskowitz

Posted on 01/28/2010 4:42:50 PM PST by KevinDavis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: TN4Liberty
Sorry, but that's crap. The images on the page you link to include a 1976 image and a couple of the images which NASA got caught smudging precisely for the purpose of convincing the public that there was nothing there worth seeing. The newer high-res images are all like the two I posted above, and that includes the European probe (ESA) images e.g.


21 posted on 01/29/2010 6:37:40 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

They are rocks, but I don’t speak “nut”, I speak “engineer” and “astronomer”.

Probably why I don’t listen to Hoagland.

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/hoagland/face.html


22 posted on 01/29/2010 8:56:30 AM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center
Hoagland has major kinds of credentials; it isn't obvious that you or anybody on that well-named "bad astronomy" website do.

Like I say, nature does not do straight lines, Bezier curves, equalateral triangles and the like on two-mile scales, and eye glasses are affordable now. There's no excuse.

23 posted on 01/29/2010 10:11:09 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

Richard Hoagland has no scientific credentials of any kind.

None.

At all.

In fact, I see no evidence he even has a BA in basket weaving. Just a lot of crazy BS.

“Like I say, nature does not do straight lines, Bezier curves, equalateral triangles and the like on two-mile scales, and eye glasses are affordable now. There’s no excuse.”

If you actually look at the real evidence, you’ll see those are clearly natural features. “Wanting to believe” is no excuse for being a nut. This is no different than denying the moon landings.


24 posted on 01/29/2010 11:29:24 AM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

Like I said, denial is a luxury you can afford when you’re not in any sort of a race; NASA is now in a race.


25 posted on 01/29/2010 12:05:05 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Like I say, nature does not do straight lines, Bezier curves, equalateral triangles and the like on two-mile scales,

Apparently it does. Believe what you want about the origin of the rock formation on Mars, but to say that nature doesn't make straight lines is laughable. There are sheer bluffs all over the world, mesas, flat bedrock that turns sideways from geological events... even then, the pictures you posted show clearly a rambling rock formation along the center of the overall formation. If you squint hard enough from directly overhead, you can make it look like a face. Maybe your walmart readers are part of the problem.

26 posted on 01/29/2010 12:44:27 PM PST by TN4Liberty (My tagline disappeared so this is my new one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty

The problem’s going to be reading about Indian and Chinese astronauts investigating those structures up close while the NASA guys are either sitting around with their ****s in their hands or are out in some other part of Mars looking for signs of microbes because they’ve somehow brainwashed themselves into believing that the remains of cities aren’t real or that germs are important and cities aren’t. In my scheme of things, cities are more interesting than germs.


27 posted on 01/29/2010 1:56:00 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

“Like I said, denial is a luxury you can afford when you’re not in any sort of a race; NASA is now in a race.”

With reality? Kinda like believing in “faces on Mars”?

Reality usually wins that race.


28 posted on 01/29/2010 2:05:24 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

“The problem’s going to be reading about Indian and Chinese astronauts investigating those structures “

Those aren’t “structures”. Those are rock formations.

“they’ve somehow brainwashed themselves into believing that the remains of cities aren’t real “

Those aren’t cities. Perhaps they aren’t the ones who are brainwashed.


29 posted on 01/29/2010 2:06:51 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I’m sure it’s all for the best.

Before long some energy corporation would start hiring people for solo three year shifts on the moon, managing equipment and making sure the mining vehicles operate correctly.

Before long, they would realize they could save a bundle by cloning the guy and killing off the clone every three years.


30 posted on 01/29/2010 2:09:26 PM PST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson