Skip to comments.
The Problem with Warp Drive
Centauri Dreams ^
| 12/28/09
Posted on 12/28/2009 6:40:01 PM PST by KevinDavis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: KevinDavis
What is the “exotic matter” mentioned in the article?
To: KevinDavis
At this point, I’ll take a couple xeon’s and a solar sail. By the time the physics are theorized, I’ll be orbiting Proxima.
22
posted on
12/29/2009 4:31:21 AM PST
by
Dimez_Recon
(Currahee Stryker: When in doubt, shoot more.)
To: rsobin
As we all know, warp drive is not usable above warp nine, else the fabric of the universe comes unglued...
So then there is hyperdrive, and ultradrive. Since ultradrive is much better and faster than hyperdrive, we should go directly for ultra - skipping both warp and hyper drive technologies.
Ultradrive utilizes alternating traction between the underside of this universe’s grid and the topside. Skipping stone effect.
23
posted on
12/29/2009 4:32:02 AM PST
by
PIF
To: rsobin
Forgot to mention: when using ultradrive one is in UltraSpace, traveling at speeds over 200,000 llightyears/hr.
In at least one universe, the Dwellers have already colonized all gas giant worlds which they have connected via worm holes locted at the very center of each colonized gas giant.
Perhaps they have colonized this universe also - so if we were to go to Jupiter and ask nicely - maybe they would give us access?
24
posted on
12/29/2009 4:43:46 AM PST
by
PIF
To: KevinDavis
>> Forget the Warp drive, I want the Stargate Interstellar Drive... <<
I would like an X-303 even an BC-304 if they have it....
I’ll even take a ZPM if they have one lying around...
25
posted on
12/29/2009 9:14:57 AM PST
by
GraceG
To: LiberConservative
How about the “Heim drive” funnily enough it was theorized by a WWII German scientists, so far their track record on space tech seems to be fairly good.
Got us to the moon, didn’t it...
26
posted on
12/29/2009 9:16:54 AM PST
by
GraceG
To: KevinDavis
Scotty, it's getting really hot in here!
I'm dooin' the best I can sir!
To: KevinDavis; SunkenCiv
I read recently that if we had a ship that was capable of incrementally accelerating toward the speed of light, but not to it, and the ship could withstand debris that might hit it, we could be a the other end of the Universe in 30-50 years.
Of course, the Earth would have long since been swallowed by the Sun in its death throes, but hey, traversing the Universe of 15+ billion light years in 30 years would be worth it!
28
posted on
12/29/2009 10:18:32 PM PST
by
ConservativeMind
(Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
To: KevinDavis; SunkenCiv; All
29
posted on
12/29/2009 10:25:58 PM PST
by
ConservativeMind
(Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
To: SunkenCiv
I didn’t ping you a half an hour a before?
30
posted on
12/30/2009 1:31:48 AM PST
by
allmost
To: allmost
You did, but I went back 31 minutes and altered the timeline.
31
posted on
12/30/2009 8:01:49 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
To: ConservativeMind
According to Einstein et al, time slows as a consequence of relative acceleration, getting down to a crawl (if viewable from a slower moving frame) as one approaches light velocity. So, in this unverifiable scenario, a long trip such as what you describe might take years aboard the ship, but time for those left behind on Earth would spin along at the usual, resulting in those kinds of consequences.
32
posted on
12/30/2009 8:06:01 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
To: ConservativeMind; SunkenCiv; KevinDavis
I read recently that if we had a ship that was capable of incrementally accelerating toward the speed of light, but not to it, and the ship could withstand debris that might hit it, we could be a the other end of the Universe in 30-50 years. Of course, the Earth would have long since been swallowed by the Sun in its death throes, but hey, traversing the Universe of 15+ billion light years in 30 years would be worth it!
Um, I think they must have forgotten to take universal expansion into account. At that point, the universe would be 30 billion light-years to its end (or beginning) and you will still be smack dab in the middle, as is everyone from their own perspective.
As for debris, even blue-shifted star light and the background microwave radiation will be working against you/heating you up.
33
posted on
12/31/2009 3:16:58 AM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(IN A SMALL TENT WE JUST STAND CLOSER! * IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
The Brits already have it all answered, we use a TARDIS. Travels both space and time.
34
posted on
12/31/2009 3:21:59 AM PST
by
Eye of Unk
(Phobos, kerdos, and doxa, said the Time Traveler. “Fear, self-interest, and honor.”)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
note to self: take plenty of sunblock.
35
posted on
01/01/2010 9:04:38 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Happy New Year!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson