WHY HASN'T ANYONE CONTACTED HELTON MAGANGA IN KENYA ?

“Jim makes those decisions, not you....”

I was wondering who would be the first to complain! :-)

ROLF or ROFL means Rolling On The Floor [Laughing]!

I was wondering who would be the first to complain! :-)

A trooooooooooll of course.

That was before the good images of the document were available. As far as it not lookimg like a "61 Kenyan BC, it doesn't purport to be a government issued one, but rather a hospital issued one. Besides which in '61, Mombasa was part of the British Protectorate of Kenya, which technically still belonged to the Sultan of Zanzibar, while the bulk of Kenya was the British Colony of Kenya. The name of the Hospital has been shown to appear as indicated in medical journal articles from the time, such as This 1963 article in the British Heart Journal. The doctor has also been shown to have been practicing in Mombasa starting in 1960.

Similarly most of Corsi's list of "Irregularities" have been refuted. The only one that hasn't been completely refuted, invoves the way the dates are written, MM/DD/YYYY rather than DD/MM/YY or DD/MM/YYYY. (today would be 9/18/2009 in the first scheme, 18/09/2009 in th second. Most of the world uses second format, but not all of it, and there is at least some indication that Kenya used both. Of course there was this little gem in the article:

Administrators and doctors at the hospital told WND sources that in 2004 a high-level team of Kenya's National Security Intelligence Service came to the hospital and seized all files containing birth certificate documents from the years 1960 through 1963.

Now why would they do that?

Of course they could have missed one, or even all of the hospital issued ones. With the footprint, in the US it would definitely be the unofficial/Commemorative BC.

WND has acknowledged the errors Corsi made in the earlier rush to judgement. A little jealousy may have reared it's head there for a bit. WND is still sceptical, as am I, but not as much as they were in that earlier article. (Second article is also by Corsi).

BTW, it's not exactly an honest technique to post an article, and not tell about the followup.

RS, Thx for the clarification...I “HIGHLY” regard you as one of the ‘heavy hitters’ on this site and appreciate your taking the time to reply....I was initially afraid when someone posted a photo of some stuffed animal image seemingly identified as “ROLF”. Thx again.