Posted on 05/17/2009 6:30:49 PM PDT by chicagolady
It looks accurate to me. Like I said you insult a lot, evade a lot and spin a lot but you never just lay the facts out straight and simple.
“Good God man, on November 4, 2008 Alan Keyes was a presidential candidate but not for the Republicans.
He couldn’t’t make any head way in the republican party so he tried to win the nomination of another one of the 49 “third” parties and that didn’t pan out so he made his third run for a parties nomination, any party would do and it turned out to be another one of the 49 “third” parties, where he pulled in an earth shattering 47,700 votes in the 2008 Presidential race.
Three nomination attempts in three different parties in one election season for the Presidency of the United States.
WOW! “
Accuracy isn't one of your strong suits.
Well, Tancredo became a passionate campaigner for the man that he believed could best carry on his mission, whatever that was, because he supported Mitt Romney.
Now Alan Keyes on the other hand wanted Governor Mike Huckabee to serve with him as vice President, if Keyes won the nomination.
Like I said you attack but you never just give facts or straightforward information.
Move to San Diego so you can kick Susan Davis’ behind. I’ll vote for you.
You picked one heck of a day to offer up the standard Obama/RINO attacks on Dr. Keyes, I can tell you.
You’re just another poster child why I’m not a Republican any more.
And I wouldn’t trade Dr. Keyes for a hundred thousand like you.
How many ‘little white guys’ run as opposed to Hispanics? Your numbers don’t hold up.
The “Hispanic” label is extraneous and telling.
Stick with “Conservative.” That’s enough.
EV when you start your BS and spinning it naturally will draw responses.
Keyes hasn’t been a Republican since three parties ago, back when he wanted Mike Huckabee to be his vice President.
I’m not a republican either, I am an Independent, you belong to Alan Keyes party.
When you state that falsehood, one which is of the same sort dealt out by the leftwing media, you insult thousands of the best people in this country, principled patriots. Like you care, right?
Fighting over the bridge of the Titantic doesn’t interest me any longer.
LOL. Funny thing is, probably the worst thing anyone can truthfully say about Tom Tancredo is that he backed Mitt after he withdrew from the race. We’re talking about someone who spent YEARS on the Hill, here. If that’s all you’ve got on him, he’s a pretty straight shooter.
Yes, Tom did back Mitt. At the time, Mitt was making some hawkish noises about the border, and Tom probably made the mistake of taking him at his word. At the time, it also looked like Mitt had a reasonable shot at picking-off McQueeg.
what cyber liberty said..
btw, Senora Mujer Chicago, explica para me porque mas veces Latinos sin Cubanos y gente de Sur America (con plata) votan para liberales
perdoname pero aparce por mi como latinos quieren votan contra gringos o anglos traditionales aqui solo porque ellos quieren el gobierno dan ellos algo o ellos no se gostan gringos porque gringos son mejores grupo aqui...y latinos tienen resentimiento y celoso
casi ochenta percento de los latinos votan para El Messiah como ellos votan los 30 anos pasado de elecciones
yo no creo que latinos son conservativos sociales, you creo que ese es un mito o fabula
mira como los statisticos criminales, ilegitimidad y corrupcion en loc communidades latinos .
como gente puede piensan que latinos son conservativo sociales? porque ellos son Catolicos?.....ellos know escuchan Il Papa como ellos deben..
tal vez, tiened muchos que son pero la cultura latino tienan bastante problemas que no eran conservativo but much permisividad.
alugno persona es conservativo o no, no es la culpa de los blancos o anglos or gringos, es la faulta de sus
que usted quieren es para el GOP va para izquierda y complacen a los latinos y oldivan nos principios
con respecto
Again some simple facts would be more useful than the same old same old.
The media is a better source than no source at all. Why don't you go to Wikipedia for instance and correct their information?
No kidding, we'll probably never learn what that was about.
Because it’s a waste of time. The people who get the final say there are liberal hacks, and no matter how many times you fix it they screw it up again on purpose. I quit worrying about it long ago. Only ignoramuses believe what they read there anyway.
Touche’.
Treading water in middle of the North Atlantic doesn’t sound much better, though. At least we have a horn section and hors d’oevres.
Some of us are building a fleet of life boats. :-)
Gotta hit the hay. Maybe we can have a serious talk about what needs to happen one of these days real soon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.