Russia: Amazing UFO filmed near Moscow, video

allnewsweb ^ | 3 May 2009 | Michael Cohen

[Quix]

Thanks.

So nice to have observant reason demonstrated on these threads.

[Quix]

Are you TOTALLY ignorant of the literature?

Yet readers of your post are supposed to give your comments some shred of respect?

ROTFLOL!

CUTE.

[Quix]

What an excellent example of projection.

Congrats.

Sheesh.

[Quix]

Seems like naysayers are chronically ignorant of the ionized air flow etc. next to the surface of the craft etc. etc. etc.

[Quix]

Y’all make that sound like a clue for disbelieving.

I find it the opposite.

I don’t know why naysayers are so chronically, habitually etc. UNcreative, UNthoughtful and UNimaginative and UNpsychologists.

[snarks_when_bored]

Here are the same two frames that I posted in post #24, but they're from the higher-resolution version of the video at the link posted by nuconvert in post #29:

 

 

 

As an aside, I point out that this video is shot at 25 frames per second, and the object takes 9 frames to go from a stationary start to appearing at the left of the building. By the 10th frame, it has completely disappeared from the video. So it took it about four-tenths of a second to go from a stationary start somewhat to the right of the building to disappearing from view at the left of the building. That's a fairly brisk pace, particularly considering that it was stationary to start with. And, of course, we don't know how far behind the building the object was, and how big it was, so the pace might be even more impressive than we might think.

Or it might just be very clever video manipulation...

[DCPatriot]

I had seen it over at ATS. The manner in which it darted out of sight....I don’t know. Not convincing to me.

[Quix]

You are such a treasure. I So much enjoy having you around.

[snarks_when_bored]

Well, I didn’t call it a flying saucer. However, it is disk-shaped and appears to be flying...(heh)...

[Revolting cat!]

Scientology? Fake.
UFOlogy? For real.

[Quix]

Thanks for your experienced, skilled, perceptive comments and observations.

Of course, naysayers aren’t interested in facts, however.

Thankfully, they are not the sum total of the universe as they seem to think they are.

[gorush]

Acceleration due to gravity:

After 1 sec...16'

After 2 secs..62'

After 3secs..138'

[Quix]

Thanks.

Good version.

[Quix]

Thanks.

Such craft DO behave exactly as seen in this video.

I’m not expert enough to comment on this example other than to express my personal opinion that hit seems plenty authentic, to me.

[JoeProBono]

[Quix]

Could you bother to please isolate and highlight maybe with a circle the bit of the craft still poking out from behind the building in the last frame it did so in . . . and then the peak on the left side of the building where last seeable?

Blessings,

[Revolting cat!]

Hey Joe, where are you going with that UFO in your hand?

See the experts:

[Quix]

Don’t know what I’m supposed to see.

Can you isolate it with a circle and maybe enlarge it even more?

[Richard Kimball]

I took some classes there but got thrown out for looking into the soul of the kid sitting next to me.

[Future Snake Eater]

Your third point is what I thought of, too. It’s gotta be a fake. Good matchmoving, though. Probably a Boujou guru.