Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. unveils Orion spacecraft to take crew to Mars
Yahoo News ^ | 03/30/09

Posted on 03/30/2009 7:34:34 PM PDT by KevinDavis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Frank_Discussion
"For the love o’ pete, Please, PLEASE, go look at the mission profiles for the Constellation program. The ORion spacecraft is only part of the system. One thing ISS has taught us is that building spacecraft IN SPACE is not only feasible, but works rather well."

Obviously anything other than the 1950s Project Orion is going to have to be built in space. And nobody is crazy enough to think anyone would attempt to fly one of those today. Its fun to talk about, but nobody is going to chuck a few hundred A-Bombs into orbit.

However it doesn't matter if they build it in space or in a shipyard on the moon or buy it at the local Walmart. If its chemical rockets it has a limited ISP and you are looking at a mulit year mission in a giant fuel tank with very limited crew space. Use a NERVA and you get twice the ISP of the best chemical engine, or more assuming the designs for the reactor are better now than in the 1960s. Also as a bonus you get a power source that doesn't degrade as you get farther from the sun like solar. For the ISS or the moon chemical is all you need. But for Mars you need to go bigger and faster than any chemical reaction can throw you.

Plasma or Ion might work, but unless powered by a reactor most of your ship would just be solar panels. And you are still going to run into problems with small living space. And a ship dependent on solar power is harder, although not impossible, to spin up for gravity.
41 posted on 03/30/2009 9:29:19 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf
Y'know what sold the Space Shuttle? Earth Day, 1970. The whole "reusable" idea was the only thing fundable at that time.

The fact that we've blown up two of the five of them should convince everyone that maybe it wasn't the best idea, only the most politically correct idea.

42 posted on 03/30/2009 9:29:30 PM PDT by hunter112 (SHRUG - Stop Hussein's Radical Utopian Gameplan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

I think you still haven’t gone to look at the information on Constellation.

As for chem rockets to Mars, I totally agree. I am putting my money (figuratively) on VASIMR. The main guy who is working on the technology, Dr. Franklin Chang-Diaz, has a mission plan that takes two weeks to Mars for the crewed mission, and some months for the Cargo ship. Serious as a heart attack - two weeks, LEO to Mars Orbit.

Yes, it would take nukes. Someday, sombody is going to realize that as an inevitability.


43 posted on 03/30/2009 9:38:44 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Not that the Navy isn't fully capable of doing so and has done some great space stuff in the past.

I had the pleasure of meeting the great Captain Robert C. Truax (USN) years ago.


44 posted on 03/30/2009 9:39:24 PM PDT by anymouse (God didn't write this sitcom we call life, he's just the critic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf
Is that an extra-large, heavy-duty cappuccino machine?
45 posted on 03/30/2009 9:52:36 PM PDT by TheThinker (Even though Obama is President, I'm more American than that impostor will ever be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

I respectfully disagree. It was the ability to do so many things. The shuttle is a very utilitarian vehicle. Reusable was a bonus.

However, our disagreement aside, $450 million per shot for the shuttle is not sustainable.

I still think we can do better. We’ve become a lazy society, in mind and body. We need to be challenged in a motivating way again.


46 posted on 03/30/2009 10:05:47 PM PDT by papasmurf (Trow da' bum out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker

Kinda looks like an old Italian coffee pot I inherited, the double decker kind.


47 posted on 03/30/2009 10:06:38 PM PDT by papasmurf (Trow da' bum out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf
I'll admit, they certainly made a Swiss Army knife out of the thing. But it also locked our space program into 1970's technology well into the 21st Century.

At some point, we will have different propulsion systems that will make the dreams of the science fiction writers come true. A hundred years ago, you had to be a mechanic to own and operate an auto, and even then, you had a limited range of decent roads to drive on. That's no longer the case.

Until we get a Zefram Cochrane to invent some sort of warp drive system, we're probably best served by using single purpose space vehicles. They got us out of the atmosphere and on to the surface of the moon in a timeframe that even the sci-fi writers couldn't have imagined.

48 posted on 03/31/2009 6:33:54 AM PDT by hunter112 (SHRUG - Stop Hussein's Radical Utopian Gameplan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I`m 61 and remember Apollo quite well,remember thinking
back then we`ll have men on Mars by the time I`m 50

Have hopes that I`ll live to see this pulled off.Kinda
jealous of a boy or girl born today...the stuff they`ll
see...If we survive this Commie in Chief today


49 posted on 03/31/2009 7:20:44 AM PDT by Harold Shea (RVN `70 - `71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Harold Shea

I, too, remember the Apollo landing. I was watching it with my Mom, and she started crying and saying “Oh no, God is gonna’ punish us for this”. LOL


50 posted on 03/31/2009 9:28:49 AM PDT by papasmurf (Trow da' bum out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

http://objflicks.com/TakeMeBackToTheSixties.htm


51 posted on 03/31/2009 9:32:50 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules ("We live in an amazing, amazing world, and it's wasted on the crappiest generation of spoiled idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

Being that I went form child to teen to adult during those times, I thought that was fantastic!

Thank you!


52 posted on 03/31/2009 10:51:04 AM PDT by papasmurf (Trow da' bum out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson