Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS Re: Obama....Live Thread

Posted on 12/05/2008 6:33:15 AM PST by maineman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 801-805 next last
To: netmilsmom

All questions are answered on Leo’s site.
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/


241 posted on 12/05/2008 9:50:01 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Repeat my earlier post responding to #86:

Whether he was elected or not, is irrelevant; the people did not _know_ he was ineligible. The DNC and news media hid the information from us.

Further, this the United States of America is not a democracy, where a mere 51% of the people vote to deny lawful rights. Specifically, We the People’s right to a lawful, U.S. Constitutionally guaranteed, President (and other branches). The Supreme Court members need to act accordingly.


242 posted on 12/05/2008 9:50:54 AM PST by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Maybe take those monkeys and replace their signs with “Executive,” “Congress” and “Judicial”


243 posted on 12/05/2008 9:51:23 AM PST by baa39 (www.FightFOCA.com - innocent lives depend on you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

McCain was born in Panama. At the time, it was a U.S. possession. The constitution considers a person born in a state, a territory or a U.S. possession to be a U.S. citizen.

When McCain was asked to prove his citizenship, he simply provided a birth CERTIFICATE, and the problem was solved.

Obama continues to spend millions to stonewall something that McCain was able to do for FREE.


244 posted on 12/05/2008 9:51:25 AM PST by King David (Sarah Palin for President in '12!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: maineman

Justice Breyer and Justice Scalia talk about how they interpret the constitution.

It reveals Justice Breyer cares more about purpose and consequence and Justice Scalia cares more about history and tradition.

Watch if you’d like. These two Justices could not be more DIFFERENT in their approach to the Constitution. It was chilling hearing Justice Breyer talk about applying the Constitution in today’s world. He stopped short of saying the Constitution is out of date!! I perceived an alarming lack of respect from Justice Breyer for the Constitution.

It is disturbing. Perhaps my perception is wrong but I am unsettled after viewing this video.

I love Justice Scalia especially his last sentence!!!!! Watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXeUfVhDVUM&feature=related


245 posted on 12/05/2008 9:51:42 AM PST by joygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm; SE Mom; Bahbah; penelopesire; Miss Didi; rodguy911; gpapa; RonDog; RaginApache; ...

I’ve been listening a bit ... is Joe Thunder
live, or is this another replay like an hour
ago, when they replayed Leo’s brief interview
from last night?

Leo’s updates:

http://www.naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com

###

***BUCKHEAD, TANKERKC ALERT***

Dan Rather in Panic Mode: Move Inauguration to December 1 (Video also)

December 5, 2008 - 11:15 ET

@@@

Appearing on Friday’s “Morning Joe,” former CBS anchor Dan Rather chided President Bush for not doing enough during his lame duck period and argued for moving Inauguration Day up to December 1.

And although Rather didn’t explain specifically what Bush wasn’t doing enough about (The financial crisis? The terrorist incident in India?), he did hyperbolically fret, “But, we’re in possibly, possibly the biggest crisis we’ve been in since December 7, 1941 and maybe since the time of the Civil War.” (As big a calamity as slavery and the dissolution of the Union?)

Addressing the past practice of inaugurating presidents in March, Rather lobbied “Thank heaven, we now swear them in, new presidents, in January.

I’d be in favor of moving it up to December 1st.” (The former network anchor didn’t explain how he would then deal with situations like the protracted 2000 post-election battle.)

*Audio*

http://media.eyeblast.org/newsbusters/static/2008/12/2008-12-05-MSNBC-MJ-Rather.mp3

~ ~ ~

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2008/12/05/dan-rather-argues-bush-not-doing-enough-move-inauguration-dec-1


246 posted on 12/05/2008 9:53:06 AM PST by STARWISE ((They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

McCain is a citizen by statute - not naturalization.


247 posted on 12/05/2008 9:53:34 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: DooDahhhh

>The reporter I heard on the msm said that the American voters said he was eligible by voting him in. Now, what the hell does that mean?

“I voted for him, so there’s nothing you can do about it because I matter and you don’t!” is, I believe, the correct translation you’re looking for.


248 posted on 12/05/2008 9:54:30 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: DooDahhhh; All

Isn’t that exactly what Martinez & Isaakson said?

“The voters said he was eligible by voting for him”?

Now, if no one knew about his LIE, how does that make him eligible?


249 posted on 12/05/2008 9:54:31 AM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: maineman

McCain is irrelevant. If O is deemed ineligible, the President will be Biden, Pelosi, or Hillary. So basically, it’s lose-lose for our party. But at least we uphold the constitution.


250 posted on 12/05/2008 9:55:00 AM PST by couchpotatoxxx12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baa39
"I don’t have a TV, but it’s in many papers this morning, all slanted as right-wing conspiracy nuts persecuting Obama."

That's hilarious since this whole thing is a no lose for the Dem/marxist party. They could either change the Constitution for Obama or get Hillary elected. I don't think the party elites give a care which way it goes.

251 posted on 12/05/2008 9:56:13 AM PST by Earthdweller (Socialism makes you feel better about oppressing people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: DooDahhhh

252 posted on 12/05/2008 9:56:44 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: maineman

Is there any word on the vigil and how it is going? Are you in touch with Freeper Joe Thunder or beckman?


253 posted on 12/05/2008 9:57:08 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: erkyl

I do not believe that the SCOTUS will defer to New Jersey courts, to determine the meaning of ‘natural born citizen’ as the Founders meant, when applied to a citizens’ eligibility for the Presidency.


254 posted on 12/05/2008 9:57:23 AM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Thanks for the ping!


255 posted on 12/05/2008 9:57:31 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (Hey Obama, why lawyer up when you can pony up? Show us your vault copy BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?

In Barry's case, he either was born in Kenya or his father registered his birth at a UK Consulate within 12 months of his birth. Either one, in my opinion, put him in a tough spot because there can be no claim of "well, I had no control over what some other country was doing... it was automatic,"

No it wasn't. Either it was because he was physically there or because his father specifically acted to place him under the jurisdiction of the Crown. And that, my friends, is not good.

Now, the burden of proof as to citizenship has shifted and the claimant of NCB must prove it. Cough up the docs, Barry, or go home to Mombassa.

256 posted on 12/05/2008 9:59:59 AM PST by Shady Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm
Leo is on after the break

Was the pre recorded?

http://www.plainsradio.com/

257 posted on 12/05/2008 10:00:31 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Stentor
I join in your confusion.

Glad it's not me. I was getting a complex :(

Just reporting.

And thanks for the info, Stenor! :)

258 posted on 12/05/2008 10:00:51 AM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: couchpotatoxxx12

bttt


259 posted on 12/05/2008 10:01:06 AM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
I’ve been listening a bit ... is Joe Thunder live, or is this another replay like an hour ago, when they replayed Leo’s brief interview from last night?

My bad again! I took this info from another site and tuned in thinking it was live since they stated it was. It wasn't until just know that I heard Leo pop in to talk which means it was last nights recording.

It's still a good listen! Sorry...
260 posted on 12/05/2008 10:01:07 AM PST by jcsjcm (Upholding the Constitution til my last breath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 801-805 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson