Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question about oil...

Posted on 04/16/2008 8:15:37 AM PDT by YankeeMagic

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: dblshot
Alaskans are not receiving the oil checks they used too

They are as big as the peak but they are not bad. I wasn't complaining about the last ones my family received. $1,654 per person was certainly above average.


61 posted on 04/16/2008 1:01:06 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

They are NOT as big as the peak
62 posted on 04/16/2008 1:01:54 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: thackney
well I'm a little behind on the stats there, things are looking up, 08 ought to be good if the price of oil is a factor. Might even get some of those Indians camping out around Frontier Square in Seattle to move back for their checks.
63 posted on 04/16/2008 1:10:15 PM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

It should be a good year. It is a 5 year average on earnings.

But most of the earning now are from income of the fund, now over $38 billion. Oil income through the state was only 10% of the 2007 earning. The program has been set up to keep growing without being so dependent on the oil revenues.

http://www.apfc.org/iceimages/ReportsPublications/2007_AR.pdf


64 posted on 04/16/2008 1:19:45 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“The program has been set up to keep growing without being so dependent on the oil revenues’

What? A government with fiscal sense! Holy smoked salmon, there is hope for us all.


65 posted on 04/16/2008 1:43:08 PM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: dblshot
Only after a hard lesson.

Q: Why did Alaskans create the Fund?

A: During construction of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline in the 1970’s, oil companies flooded state coffers with money paid for leases to explore and secure drilling rights. The Legislature spent all $900 million of that initial lease money within a few years. Alaskans realized that they were about to receive a great deal more money from oil when the pipeline was complete. They wished to better safeguard the robust income forthcoming from the pipeline, but the state constitution did not allow for dedicated funds. So Alaskans voted in 1976 to amend the constitution to put at least 25% of the oil money into a dedicated fund: the Permanent Fund. This would save money for future generations, which would no longer have oil as a source of income. In 1976 Governor Hammond proposed a constitutional amendment to create the Fund. The 9th Alaska Legislature modified the governor's legislation and placed it as a ballot proposition in the 1976 General Election. It passed by a margin of two to one.

http://www.apfc.org/theapfc/faq.cfm

Q: Could there be no dividend in some years?

A: Yes. The Alaska Constitution states that the Fund's principal cannot be spent. The dividend can only be paid from Fund earnings. If the earnings reserve is zero or negative on June 30, no money can be paid out. APFC Trustees are proposing a better method for determining Fund annual payout that would require a change to the constitution through a vote of the people. The Percent of Market Value (POMV) payout method would remove the distinction between principal and earnings, treating the Permanent Fund as one pot of money. Five percent of the Fund's total market value could be paid out each year.

66 posted on 04/16/2008 1:48:28 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: YankeeMagic
You might want to look at the type of oil coming from there. The US can only function with LSC or Light Sweet Crude. All the others are sent to other countries where emissions and the engines can stand it.

Someone will probably expound on this topic if they havent yet.

67 posted on 04/16/2008 6:28:51 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Senator McCain, what did GWB promise you back in 2000? And you believed him? BWAHAAAAA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeMagic

YM, you need a new strategy for dealing with your relatives. I recommend that you stop taking them so seriously. Mrs. whipitgood and I have learned to give each other a significant look and then burst out laughing whenever our (conservative moonbat) parents start something like this. Rehearsing is a blast.


68 posted on 04/17/2008 5:17:50 AM PDT by whipitgood (Neither of, by, nor for the people any longer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson