Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bikers Playing Fast and Loose
LA Times ^ | 11.29.06 | Ralph Vartabedian

Posted on 11/30/2006 10:29:41 AM PST by absolootezer0

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-262 next last
To: RobRoy

People die. Outlaw birth!

Oh? That is what NOW and NARAL attempting to do!

Yes, I got stupid, just like the authorette that wrote the article.

Gunner


201 posted on 11/30/2006 1:57:43 PM PST by weps4ret (Things the make you go; Hmmmmmmm?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

"The vast majrity of Hardley riders are a joke"

You're painting with a rather broad brush don't you think?

Mine's black...and chrome! HA!

"hardley" gear....hehehe...never heard that one before!

um...what kind of motorcycle did you say you ride?


202 posted on 11/30/2006 1:59:27 PM PST by woollyone (a man self-deceived is twice deceived)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
Doing 80 in a 25 is a pretty good way to crash. If he's stupid enough to do that, he's too stupid to be driving.

Amen!

203 posted on 11/30/2006 1:59:31 PM PST by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
"physics comes into play here... the faster a bike goes, the more gradual an arc the rider will make even under extreme cornering...this has to do with the huge gyroscopic effects that he must fight against in order to steer / turn at high speeds. The front wheel does NOT want to turn."

Two wheeled vehicles are sterred by counter steering. When the rider wants to steer right, they turn the handlebars to the left. Just turning the handlebars to the left causes the bike to go into a right lean and steer right. Steering a bike should be done with a snap action, where the bars are moved fast into the position judged for the desired curve. Neither the bike, nor the front wheel offers much resistance to this movement at all. In fact the handling of the bars in hard cornering changes only requires a light touch. The reason is, because when the bars are moved in one direction, a large torque appears on the angular momentum vector forcing the bike to both lean and turn in the opposite direction. The large steering forces come from the rotating front wheel, not the rider. All that's required from the rider to steer is their gentle touch on the bars, and perhaps shifting their own weight to minimize the lean angle. The only riders that have trouble steering and note large resisting forces are those that try to steer, instead of counter steer. That's, because they are trying to move the bike in the opposite direction of where they told the machine to go. That is very hard to do.

204 posted on 11/30/2006 2:00:34 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath
No, mandatory insurance laws force people to buy a commodity from organizations that have to spend millions to hire shady lobbyists who persuade Congressional crooks to pass laws to make the public buy their shitty products.

Those same organizations have long and storied histories of denying claims and screwing their policyholders when it came time to pay a claim. It's really just a big Ponzi scheme. You're betting your insurance company that they won't have to pay a claim. Just like in Vegas, the house always wins.

So, how do you feel about being "forced to share risks"?

If you really believe that mandatory insurance is about us "all sharing the risk", you either work for them, or you're naive. It's about them protecting themselves from the next most predatory entities in America: Lawyers and the idiots who will sue for anything.

Do you really like being told by the government what to buy?
Oh, BTW, I'm not condoning someone riding a motorcycle (or driving a car) irresponsibly. Responsible people don't drive any vehicle on a 25 MPH road at 80. I was objecting to the obviously biased comment from an insurance hack against anyone who rides a motorcycle. I've ridden every kind of motorcycle made for over 35 years, and I can't count the number of close calls I've had from lousy drivers.

Do I condemn all drivers? No. In fact, the odds are good that most of the idiots who've nearly killed me are probably considered "safe drivers" (and by extension, acceptable risks) by their insurance companies.

Little comfort when they kill someone, and then walk away saying "Honest, Officer. I didn't even see the motorcycle" with their cell phone still stuck to their ear. I could elaborate on why a number of reasons why auto drivers don't typically see motorcyclists very well, but that's probably too much detail, and I've got work to do.
205 posted on 11/30/2006 2:04:31 PM PST by conservativeharleyguy (Technically, we're all Republicans (still)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff
My only problem with the crotchrockets is that their riders don't exactly go out of their way to improve their visibility to automobile drivers. I can't remember the last time I saw a motorcycle with its headlight on.

I wasn't aware that the you could turn the headlights off...

206 posted on 11/30/2006 2:05:57 PM PST by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie

I should have thrown in a couple caveats - my apologies.

No problems at night at all. Most are responsible drivers, particularly the cruising-types that ride in groups.

Just speaking of the adrenaline junkies. The low-slung nature of the vehicles inhibits visibility. Where I live, bicyclists are an even bigger nuisance than motorcycle drivers.

Makes me jealous at times, but the thought of having to have nearly-permanent vigilance while not being able to get a sip of water is foreign. Happy with my convertible Mustang. Stay safe out there.


207 posted on 11/30/2006 2:11:27 PM PST by IslandJeff (FR mail me to be added to the Type I Diabetes ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: woollyone
I used to race for Kawasaki. I no longer ride due to injuries but then again, i don't pretend to. Nor do I dress like some goob in Team Green gear (anymore). :)

Oh, and no, it's no broad brush saying the vast majority of hardley riders are a joke. it's the truth. Heroin addict looking wankers who spend more time buying "Officially licensed Hardley gear" and polishing chrome pipes they'll never blue because the just putt putt down main street trying to scare granny off the sidewalk with loud pipes while riding helmetless in a leather doo-rag. Dorks.

Hey, if you like harleys, fine, and if you are a good, serious rider, even better. That's awesome. I used to ride with a ton of harley lovers. We had a ton of fun together. Those are not the peole I'm goofing on, but they make up a pretty small minority of the Harley sqad, epecially around here it seems.

208 posted on 11/30/2006 2:14:03 PM PST by Fierce Allegiance ( <h2>SAY NO TO RUDY! I know how to spell, I just type like s#it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
I am well aware of counter steering as I've explained it in previous posts here on this thread.

My point was to explain to a car driver what a motorcyclist has to do / what he is likely capable of doing at 150+ mph.

If you have any high speed riding experience you'll agree that if you're doing 160 miles an hour and coming up on traffic doing 55 and you attempt to pass them on the right, you'll initiate the turn well in advance. Then if the driver of the auto tries to "help" you and put the turn signal on and quickly move over to the right lane, you'll have already traveled an additional 200 or so feet closer to him. You're already well into an arc headed right, now he's dead nuts ahead of you and your closing in at over 100 miles an hour difference. To quickly change directions AGAIN and pass him on the left will be extremely difficult and could quite possibly end in a rear end collision. While not impossible to do if I were in the riders situation I would much prefer the auto driver stay in his lane and let me do what I have to do to pass him before he changes the rules of the game. Try it sometime.

Get back to me.

:)
209 posted on 11/30/2006 2:15:07 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

Fascinating. I'm glued to this thread.

How quickly can you decelerate from 160 and how much reaction time do you get in that situation? Is there a muscle memory mechanism in place for the increased steering resistance from slowing down?


210 posted on 11/30/2006 2:22:50 PM PST by IslandJeff (FR mail me to be added to the Type I Diabetes ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

Some are even freepers. I made a comment on here once about the dangers to bikers of animals running in the road. One Harley idiot "biker" said I was "riding nice" because his pipes were louder than my Jap bike, implying he could scare the critters away. The biggest fool said he could "adjust his speed" to miss an animal. Even a high school drivers ed student knows more about braking distances. Nothing makes one look stupider than to criticize a true motorcyclist and show your complete ignorance of the subject in the process. Looks like some of the responses to my original post back me up. Thanks, guys.


211 posted on 11/30/2006 2:24:12 PM PST by FNG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: faloi

I have been riding for many, many years. I don't care for the canyon carvers (metric bikes), but from time to time I do like to ride my Harley's hard and fast. However, 80 in a 25 through a populated area......well, this kid was stupid.

Out on the road, nobody around but you but mother nature and the animals...well, you take your chances with many things in life, but you are not putting others in jeopardy.


212 posted on 11/30/2006 2:24:48 PM PST by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

It does get damned thirsty (I can't deny that) with a full face helmet and jacket in FL in the summer...

But with my height (6'2") and the bike's height (V-Stroms are TALL), I just might have better visibility than you.


213 posted on 11/30/2006 2:28:36 PM PST by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie

Florida in full leathers. I think I just lost six pounds reading that sentence.


214 posted on 11/30/2006 2:35:02 PM PST by IslandJeff (FR mail me to be added to the Type I Diabetes ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath
Or is yield supposed to mean don't move unless no one is in sight?

That would bite! One can only look left OR right, not both at the same time. How long would one have to sit at an intersection to be sure? Do I need to put in a redlight at my driveway? Blackbird.

215 posted on 11/30/2006 2:46:02 PM PST by BlackbirdSST (Stay out of the Bushes, unless you're RINO hunting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

To be fair, it is a mesh jacket. But that doesn't seem to help much. When it is hot (most of the time) and humid (all of the time) it is just damned brutal.


216 posted on 11/30/2006 2:48:18 PM PST by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: bagadonutz

Great screen name.

Johnny Carson used to have a bunch of names he used. One was Joey Bagadonutz.


217 posted on 11/30/2006 2:49:39 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

"My point was to explain to a car driver what a motorcyclist has to do / what he is likely capable of doing at 150+ mph."

I think the point you're trying to make is this, and please correct me if I'm wrong.

Car drivers have nothing with which to compare the acceleration rate of a large cc sport bike. Therefore, it's the ability to plan moves ahead of time, and not have the elements of the equation change afterwards. If it does, you are extremely limited in options, and most likely doomed.

For instance, if someone unfamiliar with the acceleration rate of a sport bike, is asked to take one and accelerate as fast as possible towards a visible point, and let off at the right time to stop, most would pick a point much too late to do so.

I also tell motorcycle riders to ride with the thought that everything and everyone on the road is out to get you.


218 posted on 11/30/2006 2:50:28 PM PST by mutley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
I'd be screaming long before 180.

Thanks. I'll never get that picture out of my head. Thanks a lot. ;) Blackbird.

219 posted on 11/30/2006 2:51:05 PM PST by BlackbirdSST (Stay out of the Bushes, unless you're RINO hunting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Or we could just try to demonize the last true performance vehicle available to common humans. I'd rather demonize the idiot.


220 posted on 11/30/2006 2:51:12 PM PST by Sender ("Always tell the truth; then you don't have to remember anything." -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-262 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson