Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bikers Playing Fast and Loose
LA Times ^ | 11.29.06 | Ralph Vartabedian

Posted on 11/30/2006 10:29:41 AM PST by absolootezer0

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-262 next last
To: SwordofTruth
Idiots that fly on bikes or cars like this on public roads are asking to die, hell they are begging for it.

Exactly. Take your bike out to the alkali flats and kill yourself for all I care. But when you are on a public thoroughfare, act like a responsible citizen.

141 posted on 11/30/2006 12:14:07 PM PST by Wormwood (Self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker

same can be said for the experimental planes falling all over KaliFohnya


142 posted on 11/30/2006 12:14:44 PM PST by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
There are a lot of idiots on these sorts of bikes, and their idiocy endangers others. Best not to defend them.

There are buches of idiots on the roads, period. (An amazing number of them riding harleys w/o helmet or other PPE.)

I still suspect that the rider, while acting stupidly, probably did not intend to do a kamikaze attack on the car.

143 posted on 11/30/2006 12:15:03 PM PST by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mutley

I quiver in my shoes. I'm not around people like you.


144 posted on 11/30/2006 12:15:11 PM PST by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

Of course it wasn't the bike's fault, it was the bike RIDERS fault. The bike HAS no actions with out the bike rider.


145 posted on 11/30/2006 12:15:43 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

ain't that the truth...remember the yamaha RD 350 ?

oh my.........


146 posted on 11/30/2006 12:15:56 PM PST by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
Nope. On a motorcycle, the bike has to lean to turn at any pace faster than roughly 10 mph. To get the bike to lean right, you actually turn the handlebars slightly to the left when initiating the turn.

Below 10 mph or so, you would turn the handlebars to the right and keep the bike upright.

Some riders do this instinctively, most need to be taught.

147 posted on 11/30/2006 12:15:58 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

"Bikers" to me means black leather-clad guys on cruisers, either 1%ers, or guys imitating the look.

The rest of us are motorcyclists. Idiots pulling this type of stuff, however, I would just call squids. And yes, they do give the rest of us a bad name, right along with the straight-pipe cruisers who blow your eardrums out every time they pull away from a stop.


148 posted on 11/30/2006 12:16:31 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mutley
The Ninja was a fast and very fun ride that begged the rider to push the envelope. I rode with leathers and brain bucket. Hated the thought of getting nailed by a bumble bee without the leathers, and the brain bucket is required. Those bumble bees would leave a welt that would last for weeks, even through the leathers, can't imagine hitting one without them.

Never got caught by the police, and they gave up their speed trap as it was just too easy a target for us.

I have given up the bikes. I'm just not interested in them anymore. Sure there's new and interesting models out there, just found other pastimes.
149 posted on 11/30/2006 12:18:28 PM PST by Ouderkirk (America won't win another war until the 1960's flower children are pushing up petunias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Tough to see in this instance, and yes, his speed is definitely a contributing factor. Can I completely hang this on her? No. On him, to the larger extent.

But the answer is not to blame the motorcycle for the actions of the rider, any more than it is to blame the rifle for a school shooting.

150 posted on 11/30/2006 12:19:05 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: bagadonutz

"typical anti-rider story. She pulled out in front of the bike and he's at fault?"

If he was going 80 in a 20 zone, yes. And I say that as a rider - when someone pulls out in front of me when I'm going faster than the posted limit, I assume that they probably looked and didn't see me, or saw me and judged from the distance that they were safe to pull out, based on the speed they assumed I would be going.


151 posted on 11/30/2006 12:19:52 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie

"There is NOTHING in this world funnier than watching a harley "rider" drop his bike. I saw two during Biketoberfest this year."

Well, ahem :(

There is a vid that makes it's rounds to all the parties I go to with my MC friends. It shows moi....falling over at a big fat zero MPH in my buddies driveway on my brand new Aprilia Falco (a few years back). Ouch. What can I say? A 32 inch inseam with a 33 1/2 inch seat height.


152 posted on 11/30/2006 12:21:35 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth
Those kind of people are not exclusively bike riders, they drive cars too. I was mistaken I think the poster of this article and his defense of bike riders, is younger than 13.
153 posted on 11/30/2006 12:21:37 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker; blackie; BikerTrash
I think this case is one of (paraphrasing Tom Clancy) too much power under the tank and not enough brains behind the handlebars.

To paraphrase further:

Too much power between the legs and too little between the ears.

154 posted on 11/30/2006 12:24:18 PM PST by uglybiker (Don't look at me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

Those are beautiful bikes.


You should get taller boots! :)


155 posted on 11/30/2006 12:26:01 PM PST by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth

actually, i ride a 73 cb350 and a 74 cl450. i ride for pleasure, not for speed.


156 posted on 11/30/2006 12:27:59 PM PST by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: wbill

"I've never seen anyone on a Harley travelling down the Interstate at 80+ on one wheel."

Of course you haven't. It's a physical impossibility :)

OTOH, I've never seen anyone but cruiser riders doing a bar crawl on bikes. While I've been known to ride my bike after a beer, or two at the most (over lunch), most (non-cruiser) riders I known won't drink at all when riding. OTOH, I always see cruisers parked at bars.

But that's just another generalization, and I'm sure a lot of cruiser riders wouldn't think of riding drunk, either.


157 posted on 11/30/2006 12:28:28 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie
"Those are beautiful bikes."

Agree. It was a nice bike. The rear shock (sachs) that came on those bikes were horrible. All the Falco's that came to the US were wildly under sprung in the rear and had the preload collar cranked all the way down as tight as it would go. Once you tossed out the shock and put a real one in there it improved the handling greatly. It was pretty quick... but the 60 degree V twin left me a little cold...kinda like the Honda RR-51. Those two bikes are remarkably similar.
Soooooooooooooo Now I'm back to my first love..... a Ducati 888 SPO. I can't get enough of those 90 degree V's. :)
158 posted on 11/30/2006 12:30:44 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Ditter; absolootezer0
Those kind of people are not exclusively bike riders, they drive cars too. I was mistaken I think the poster of this article and his defense of bike riders, is younger than 13.

You should probably read the entire article and the poster's commentary before making such churlish comments. The poster is clearly NOT defending the idiot on the bike, but chiding the journalist for moronic commentary against a particular style of bike which have no relevance to the behavior of the person operating it.

159 posted on 11/30/2006 12:30:56 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

RR-51 should be RC-51


160 posted on 11/30/2006 12:31:52 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-262 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson