Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lacrosse players' defense: Documents being withheld
HeraldSun ^ | September 1, 2006 | William F. West

Posted on 09/01/2006 10:19:41 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 561-568 next last
To: RecallMoran

Richard "Belief of it oppresses me already" Broadhead is a complete jerk. He has never said one thing that was favorable about the team and never said one word in defense of the players charged. He never will either. What a rat.


321 posted on 09/06/2006 1:40:34 AM PDT by SarahUSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

Based on your experience, if a prostitutue brought in $1000 for the night, what would her percentage be?


322 posted on 09/06/2006 3:23:24 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (quent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Wow -- leave no stone unturned! ;)


323 posted on 09/06/2006 3:29:13 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: All

Link to 8/31/06 motion...

http://liestoppers.blogspot.com/


324 posted on 09/06/2006 3:44:49 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: SarahUSC
Shakespeare, you say.

http://johninnorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2006/09/duke-lacrosse-disturbing-chronicle.html

See bottom post at 7:15 PM

325 posted on 09/06/2006 4:01:58 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: abb

Wow...
one of the crimes:

4/26/04 child molestation
(bottom of page 4)
Witness?
Dear old Dad? Boyfriend?
Wonder who she was living with in 2004. Gotta look that up.


326 posted on 09/06/2006 4:10:39 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (quent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

2111 CHARLES ST, DURHAM NC 27707-2907, DURHAM COUNTY (Dec 1999 - Jan 2006)

530 N HARDEE ST APT D1, DURHAM NC 27703-1523, DURHAM COUNTY (Sep 1997 - Jan 2005)


327 posted on 09/06/2006 4:19:29 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (quent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

The child abuse charge interests me as well due to my pet theory that CGM acts the way she does because she was sexually abused as a child by a male relative or close family friend.


328 posted on 09/06/2006 4:34:52 AM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

What does the "rape reported at 3457 Hillsborough road on or about the same date" have to do with this case?


329 posted on 09/06/2006 5:39:59 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: gopheraj

mark


330 posted on 09/06/2006 5:52:53 AM PDT by gopheraj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

3457 Hillsborough Road is Kroger's address.


331 posted on 09/06/2006 6:21:59 AM PDT by I want to know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: abb

As I thought, the motion is far more persuasive then the watered down version in the papers. In most courts, civil or criminal, failing to turn over documents after months and months, is grounds for dismissal or sanctions. This is simply wholesale stonewalling. No excuse.


332 posted on 09/06/2006 6:34:15 AM PDT by streeeetwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: streeeetwise

Great work at liestoppers--new motion to compel discovery--

http://liestoppers.blogspot.com/

Among the new details to emerge:

There are VHS tapes of at least two of the ID sessions– the one held for Kim (the second dancer) was not done until May 11– which is AFTER the indictments!

There is a cache of internal police emails about the case, but these were never turned over to the defense. (The defense found out
about this email collection on their own while rummaging through the DPD files, but it still hasn’t been turned over)

Nifong (as of the date of the motion) STILL had not produced the tox report (though he told judge Smith he would)

The AV was involved in at least four police probes:

DUI — 2000
Larceny — 2000
Family/Minor — 2000
Child Molestation — 4-26-2004

She may have been a complaintant in the child molestation probe.

Seems like a great way to run an investigation--indict first, then collect the evidence; arrest every witness in sight to intimidate them; get the defendants trumped-up convictions of their own--I never saw anything like this on Law and Order!


333 posted on 09/06/2006 6:36:52 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: abb; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; Ken H; JLS; All

Please see post 333 for the latest motion.


334 posted on 09/06/2006 6:41:09 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: I want to know

No rape was reported at the Kroger as far as I know.


335 posted on 09/06/2006 6:45:46 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
I just think they should use whatever they like and to hell with those who are "offended" if there's a white privilege connotation to it.

Bingo--and you wonder why folks are worried about a Durham jury. The "hell with them" is sure to help town/gown relations /sarc.

336 posted on 09/06/2006 6:53:28 AM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
What "good samaritan" puts a staggering half dressed hooker drunk in their car at 1 in the morning? Kim, with her out of state plates, picks up a half dressed drunk, puts her in her car and doesn't call police? Who does that? Wouldn't it have made more sense to go to Krogers, tell security and send police to the woman? No cop in their right mind would believe a sane person would put a random drunk in their car. I don't believe it "happens all the time."

If the cops didn't ask questions of Kim, they weren't doing their job..or they knew her.

337 posted on 09/06/2006 7:07:20 AM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01
Well much of Durham has a "to hell with them" attitude towards Duke. Is Duke just supposed to cower in white-guilt fear? Where is Durham's obligation? Do they have one?
338 posted on 09/06/2006 7:15:07 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
Funny article recently in the WSJ. Seems the cops like the pants-with-the-waistband-mid-thigh look. The trou tend to drop and trip the perp as they flee from the cops.
339 posted on 09/06/2006 7:17:21 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: RecallMoran
Brodhead's arrogance and lack of any understanding what this does to the falsely accused and their families makes him sound like a sociopath.
340 posted on 09/06/2006 7:19:41 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 561-568 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson