Skip to comments.
Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America.
Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America Web Page ^
| 27 June 2005
| Unknown
Posted on 07/14/2006 8:00:42 AM PDT by weps4ret
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: sinkspur
What's indefensible about enhancing trade between the three countries with common borders in the Americas?
Pretend a Republican isn't in the White House and think of the argument you'd make to answer that question.
21
posted on
07/14/2006 8:46:49 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: 1rudeboy
Amero.
I wonder how many millions of those it will take to buy a loaf of bread. Then we can invent the nuevo Amero that's actually the same as 10,000 old Ameros. Won't that be fun?
22
posted on
07/14/2006 8:49:07 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
Pretend a Republican isn't in the White House and think of the argument you'd make to answer that question. I'd answer it the same way I approved of NAFTA even though Clinton was president at the time.
Is it being labeled a "kook" that bothers you so much?
23
posted on
07/14/2006 8:49:33 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Today, we settled all family business.)
To: weps4ret
Why not "The Greater North American Co-Prosperity Sphere" instead? It's got that historic feel. ;)
24
posted on
07/14/2006 8:49:51 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Bikers4Bush
The citizens of the United States should not be forced into a union of this nature without their expressed consent. We did consent. We elected the people who are creating the union...and can't be bothered to de-elect them. So I guess that means we approve. ;)
25
posted on
07/14/2006 8:51:08 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: mysterio
Amero? That sounds like a made-up Corsi term.
26
posted on
07/14/2006 8:51:28 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Today, we settled all family business.)
To: sinkspur
Actually, I think the credit goes to some egghead in Canada.
27
posted on
07/14/2006 8:52:37 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Bikers4Bush
How do "working closely with" and being invaded by differ? Well, I read the SPP outline and you may have me there. On page 472, par 3, it says Canada and Mexico are both allowed 2 invasions per calendar year.
To: AmericaUnited
But only along the NAFTA Supercorridor. And they must pay toll.
29
posted on
07/14/2006 8:53:36 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: AmericaUnited
In that case mexico has grossly exceeded it's quota by allowing 10% of it's population to cross unwelcome into our country.
30
posted on
07/14/2006 8:54:27 AM PDT
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: sinkspur
I'd answer it the same way I approved of NAFTA even though Clinton was president at the time.
Well, at least you're consistant.
No, I don't mind being called a kook at all. You and I live in the nicest house on the block, and we are currently having an argument about whether to lock the door when we leave or to leave it wide open. And you're calling me a kook because I think the house might get robbed and eventually destroyed.
31
posted on
07/14/2006 8:54:39 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: MadLibDisease
32
posted on
07/14/2006 8:54:50 AM PDT
by
MadLibDisease
(The road to peace in Israel will be paved with the dead bodies of murdering muslims)
To: 1rudeboy
Speaking of the Supercorridor, did you know that they are planning on extending a spur to Cuba? Yes, The NWO has no use for Castro anymore, and will soon facilitate his demise. After that, they want to provide easy access for Cubans, who will do the work the Mexicans don't want to do.
To: AmericaUnited
So what do you think of Cornyn's plan to create a tax that would help mexico pay to upgrade it's infrastructure?
34
posted on
07/14/2006 9:04:03 AM PDT
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: mysterio
You and I live in the nicest house on the block, and we are currently having an argument about whether to lock the door when we leave or to leave it wide open. And you're calling me a kook because I think the house might get robbed and eventually destroyed. The house is going to get all kinds of new furnishings and carpet at even lower prices, more people who live in the house will be working, and houses on either side will be remodeled and upgraded.
The house will be locked. No, what I'm sensing is, you just don't like the looks of your neighbors.
35
posted on
07/14/2006 9:04:25 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Today, we settled all family business.)
To: Bikers4Bush
So what do you think of Cornyn's plan to create a tax that would help mexico pay to upgrade it's infrastructure? I haven't read about it yet, but I have a feeling it's not quite that simple.
But hey! Why would you oppose it? It would create construction work in Mexico and keep those brown people off your roof.
36
posted on
07/14/2006 9:08:13 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Today, we settled all family business.)
To: sinkspur
When all else fails your side always sinks to race baiting sinkspur. It's really sad. Never mind that I have always consistently said that I want all illegals returned home regardless of where they come from.
I would oppose it because I want my tax dollars spent here on Americans, not in a foreign country on it's citizens.
37
posted on
07/14/2006 9:12:40 AM PDT
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: sinkspur
Ah, an accusation of racism! I always know I'm dealing with a great mind when the name calling starts.
I don't like the undercutting of the American wage by slave labor forces. I live in a manufacturing area, and countless jobs have gone to Mexico since the NAFTA abomination. But it sure is neat that there's more cheap crap to buy at Walmart. We should definitely erase our borders so that a head of lettuce costs 15 cents instead of 25. Sure.
38
posted on
07/14/2006 9:13:17 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: sinkspur
39
posted on
07/14/2006 9:14:39 AM PDT
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: Bikers4Bush
So what do you think of Cornyn's plan to create a tax that would help mexico pay to upgrade it's infrastructure? Show me where that is in writing, EXACTLY how you presented it, and then I'll comment on it. I generally don't waste time commenting on fictitious bogeyman.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson