Posted on 07/01/2006 4:52:40 PM PDT by Lori675
"There is nothing new under the Sun". There goes my career as a joke writer!
All my friends will have a wake-up-for-coffee joke.
Thanks!
There is no way to explain ATTRACT-ATTRACT using contemporary electrical theory... he RECYCLES a stabilized energy could not be understood if he somehow TAKES APART and then RE-ASSEMBLES the electron itself, UNBELIEVABLE!Sure is hard to disagree. ;')
This is not a news story, because...
http://www.electrifyingtimes.com/erik_masen_suppression.html
"In the late 1970s, Rory Johnson, a brilliant inventor in Elgin, Illinois, created a cold-fusion, laser-activated, magnetic motor that produced 525 horsepower, weighed 475 pounds and would propel a large truck of bus 100,000 miles on about 2 pounds of deuterium and gallium. This was years before either Pons & Fleischman or Dr. James Patterson entered the scene with their cold-fusion technology. Johnson entered negotiations with the Greyhound Bus Company to install this revolutionary motor in several buses in order to demonstrate fuel savings, maintenance reduction and, hence, the possibility of greater profits for Greyhound...
"After a year of hearing nothing but silence from Johnson, Greyhound agents tried to contact him-only to be notified that he had passed away unexpectedly."
It all sounds so needlessly complicated, the people who made the Ica Stones were flying thousands of years ago...
Speaking of open source philosphy, I was just reading the history of Tesla's Wydenclyffe facility on Long Island. He was (among other goals) trying to beam free energy through the air, using the earth and the atmosphere as oppositely charged conductors. JP Morgan was the primary investor. As it was coming together, he asked Nikola Tesla where the meter was going to go.
Of course, Tesla just wanted to get the electricity to the end user. Anyone with an aerial receiver could get as much as they needed, and there was no way to track who got it.
Morgan pulled his support, and talked other investors out of backing Tesla. The facility failed.
Something you said reminded me of this image on:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2006/arch06/060531earth-capacitator.htm
Open source software is one thing. An engine that would destroy the fuel industry and the engines that use it are quite another.
I agree with that. Tesla experienced that backlash firsthand. Hopefully, things will change with regard to energy and engines.
I think the reason for the difference in software is the existing information infrastructure. The proliferation of open source software is too hard to control.
From what I've seen, the open source folks who hoped to revolutionize the software industry were doomed from the start.
One only has to use a topdown planned and organized software systems using strict development guidelines and parameters like that of Microsoft and Apple, then use gaggle developed, anybody-adds-to-it software like Linux to see the problem.
You crack me up. :')
I guess the 2 pounds of deuterium (which should run a vehicle for thousands of years if actually being used in fusion) isn't being effectively managed. No wonder the guy never got any interest.
"I guess the 2 pounds of deuterium (which should run a vehicle for thousands of years if actually being used in fusion) isn't being effectively managed. No wonder the guy never got any interest."
I'm not sure if I understand your question, but I do know, the little guys hunting dino's from their flying machine never had the same problem with the brushes that he had...
LOL!
--Boris
Church of the Subgenius? Inquiring minds want to know.
Futuristic 80-mpg car remains elusive goal
Source: UPI
Published: Tuesday, 14 August 2001 Author: UPI Wire
Posted on 08/14/2001 15:26:07 PDT by Straight Vermonterhttp://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3b79a57f2ab0.htm
Granted the reasoning is wacky, but clearly there is more to the idea than one might think. Check out these which likely would be deemed "impossible" beacause they appear to be akin to perpetual motion devices.
Perendov Magnetic Motor
Any opinion on Liquid electricity?
I dont know if what Diggs said was true, but it definitely got my attention.
http://www.befreetech.com/energysuppression.htm
Richard Diggs - developed at an inventors workshop (I.W. international) his “Liquid Electricity Engine” that he believed could power a large truck for 25,000 miles from a single portable unit of his electrical fuel. Liquid electricity violated a number of the well known physical laws that the inventor pointed out. The inventor was also aware of the profound impact the invention could have upon the world’s economy - if it could be developed.
http://www.keelynet.com/interact/Arc_1_98-7_98/00000114.htm
Hi Dr. Jones!
Fascinating, yes Diggs was the man (still alive I am told), claimed a
DeWar flask the size of a thermos bottle could hold enough ‘compressed or liquid electricity’ to run a small city for a year.....a flask the size
of the Washington monument could power the entire US for a year...
Note; you still have to charge the durn thing...so it isn’t free energy
or even remotely close....just a novel way of storing tremendously high amounts of energy. But you could use LIGHTNING! Much like the DoDs power ring using superconductors.
Neeeu, we already got one! Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!
This man would have been my Father In Law if he were alive to meet him. This definitely is all true and there is much more behind the true story that his sons could tell you about. All developed without a formal education, but isn’t that true about a lot of the great inventors...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.