Skip to comments.
UFO study finds no sign of aliens
BBC NEWS ^
| 05/07/2006
| By Mark Simpson
Posted on 05/07/2006 12:25:53 PM PDT by oxcart
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: davisfh
"So this means that I can remove by tin-foil hat?"You need a new one, your's doesn't seem to be working to well.
41
posted on
05/07/2006 1:24:14 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: oxcart
42
posted on
05/07/2006 1:25:51 PM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(Learning to shrug is the beginning of wisdom)
To: AlexW
That is why I posted the SR-71 cancellation notice. If anyone was going to see a UFO it would of been a Blackbird at 90,000 ft going MACH 3.
43
posted on
05/07/2006 1:25:55 PM PDT
by
oxcart
(Journalism (Sic))
To: NormsRevenge
Thanks, we needed some pictures on this thread.
44
posted on
05/07/2006 1:28:34 PM PDT
by
oxcart
(Journalism (Sic))
To: oxcart
45
posted on
05/07/2006 1:32:44 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?;))
To: oxcart
My pleasure, I'm waiting to board my ride home from Reno.. trying to use up the internet access I paid for last night.. :)
To: davisfh
Good afternoon.
"I just have to believe that if "they" were here that they surely would have contacted me by now."
If you think back on all the posts to you since you've been here, can you be sure "they" haven't.
Michael Frazier
47
posted on
05/07/2006 1:40:42 PM PDT
by
brazzaville
(no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
To: oxcart
"UFO study finds no sign of aliens"
Obviously they didn't study the likes of Howie Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Jimmy Carter, Algore, John 'Vichy' Kerry, et al. There are plenty of aliens from other galaxies here, if you know where to look for them.
48
posted on
05/07/2006 1:43:28 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
To: muir_redwoods
"Given the physics involved, I find it more likely that the objects in the sky are time travelers from our own future than interstellar travelers from our own galaxy"I like that! Except it raises some problems - but it is more refreshing in this thread than a picture of Carville.
To: oxcart
"I do not make medical statements...please consult your physician." I understand. Wouldn't want to get you in trouble here.
50
posted on
05/07/2006 1:47:21 PM PDT
by
davisfh
To: Lunatic Fringe
I agree. There probably IS life out there, but it's a stretch to think they're coming for us. It's highly unlikely that they'd have the technology, resources AND the desire to visit us.
51
posted on
05/07/2006 1:49:42 PM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Yay! It's Riding Season!)
To: Lunatic Fringe
But it is very likely that life exists out there somewhere.I used to think so too. Now I'm not so sure. Guillermo Gonzalez & Jay W Richards, The Privileged Planet
52
posted on
05/07/2006 1:54:39 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Squawk 8888
I have also heard of studies where certain parts of the human brain when stimulated, triggers a "close encounter" experience. Odd isn't it?
53
posted on
05/07/2006 1:54:42 PM PDT
by
Tammy8
(Build a Real Border Fence, and enforce Immigration Laws!!!)
To: Squawk 8888
Another government disinformation report. The aliens are holding JFK hostage, have been since '63. As they fly in these saucers at the speed of light, Jack hasn't aged. He's still 46 in earth years.
If the government admits they exist Kennedy will be killed. Why would the government care since JFK is "dead" already?
Jack has been given the secret of maintaining the sexual prowress of a twenty year old. This is something Cheney must know.
It's all true, count on it.
54
posted on
05/07/2006 1:56:07 PM PDT
by
kjo
To: oxcart
55
posted on
05/07/2006 1:58:36 PM PDT
by
mugs99
(Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
To: onedoug
If there is life out there, it's an exciting story. If we are the only life in the universe, it's an exciting story.
Either way...
56
posted on
05/07/2006 2:01:06 PM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(http://ntxsolutions.com)
To: oxcart
We must have several things better than the SR71 . . . as my relative asserted 30+ years ago.
I have absolutely no confidence in, respect for the report posted. I consider it 100% disinformation. At least 98%.
57
posted on
05/07/2006 2:08:00 PM PDT
by
Quix
( PREPARE . . . PRAY . . . PLACE your trust, hope, faith and life in God's hands moment by moment)
To: Squawk 8888
It is exceedingly likely--I consider it a certainty--that the puppet masters's forces can insert all manner of visual video sorts of images into people's minds electronically. Certainly they could do so with vivid images of UFO abductions.
And, it's been postulated/asserted for some time that human NWO forces are doing at least some of the abductions pretending to be ET's.
However, to me, that does NOT explain away all the ET abduction reports and evidence--not by a considerable margin. It may be part of the picture. I do not at all consider such all of the picture.
We shall see how much I'm right or wrong in coming years.
58
posted on
05/07/2006 2:10:44 PM PDT
by
Quix
( PREPARE . . . PRAY . . . PLACE your trust, hope, faith and life in God's hands moment by moment)
To: Frank_Discussion
59
posted on
05/07/2006 2:11:01 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: ALASKA; ActionNewsBill; airborne; albertp; andysandmikesmom; areafiftyone; aruanan; ...
60
posted on
05/07/2006 2:11:37 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-128 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson