Skip to comments.
2nd Duke party dancer now questions doubts about accuser
Daily Comet & AP ^
| April 21, 2006
| ALLEN G. BREED
Posted on 04/21/2006 12:56:01 AM PDT by OakOak
Edited on 04/21/2006 2:52:00 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 1,601-1,619 next last
To: Crawdad
not even a SWAG (semi wild ass guess)
its a WAG (wild ass guess)
801
posted on
04/21/2006 12:26:06 PM PDT
by
abb
(Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
To: Howlin
One thing I've learned in my life is that there really are people who are THAT DUMB!
802
posted on
04/21/2006 12:26:52 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Howlin
Your mileage may vary. :-)lol!
803
posted on
04/21/2006 12:27:12 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: BossLady
Bachelorette.............LOL........chatty, ain't she?
804
posted on
04/21/2006 12:27:18 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: abb
thanks..I was trying to figure out what WAG meant!
To: Law is not justice but process
He must have a hole card Why ? Because it would be stupid not to? This is a Lightweights chance for noteriety and possibly election in his own right. Theres no legal downside; maybe he could look like a fool but what was he before he got appointed? A small time going nowhere career prosecuter.. No risk, no gain.
To: abb
He as much as called it a WAG himself.
807
posted on
04/21/2006 12:27:30 PM PDT
by
Crawdad
(So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
To: Jay Gould
Jay, we've all heard your concern about a possible racial slur many times, and quite frankly, as important as it seems to you, we here think being falsely accused of rape and being put on trial for it w/faulty "evidence" and non-credible witnesses is MORE important.
Ask yourself how YOU would react if a white woman questioned your manhood. Would you slur her?
Please, I implore you to prioritize your concerns re this case.
808
posted on
04/21/2006 12:27:32 PM PDT
by
Carolinamom
(Daily legal immigrant to FreeRepublic.com)
To: Howlin
Right wouldn't be the first time he has been wrong about something. Maybe he is hedging his bets today with this interview. Now he is on both sides of this case like the rest of the tv people. ;)
809
posted on
04/21/2006 12:27:56 PM PDT
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: pepperhead
I still want to know why the defense will not directly answer the question of whether or not racial slurs were used Everything they have released has been pretty bullet proof as far as facts go and pretty devastating to the DA's case - the pics and the alibi. If the players did make the cotton statement, what do they gain? Nothing - everyone cries racist. If they didn't say it (and it's pretty clear Bissey lied about some things) and they claim that, it's just the players word vs. Bissey or the strippers and people will believe what they want. It doesn't help them. They lose either way. It also has nothing to do with whether the hooker lied about rape.
810
posted on
04/21/2006 12:28:28 PM PDT
by
schooter
(Lynching white boys for black votes)
To: pepperhead
And why do the 2 (or at least one) of the accused have such solid alibis? He's supposedly fingering the same guys as the stripper?
I think the judge is grasping at sraws. The DA really *is* that stupid.
811
posted on
04/21/2006 12:28:49 PM PDT
by
Raebie
To: Howlin
Oh yeah -
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=41220648
To: pepperhead
Why the negative DNA, why the alibis? Hannity is on the radio talking about the case.. He's citing the Mexican restaurant alibi,,,
813
posted on
04/21/2006 12:29:28 PM PDT
by
Neverforget01
(Proud enemy of the drive-by-media)
To: pepperhead
You forgot the withdrawn job offers, and other universities blacklisting them.
814
posted on
04/21/2006 12:29:34 PM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(I care for my pets better than Vincente Fox cares for his own citizens)
To: Howlin
I don't even know what to think about that. I know, sorry. I was just thinking about the only player who could speak out without having people look at him as getting a plea deal.
815
posted on
04/21/2006 12:30:12 PM PDT
by
Krodg
To: Howlin
Ad for Nancy Grace's show tonight says she is going to have info on the Latest suspect. Cue up "Third Man Theme" song.
816
posted on
04/21/2006 12:30:45 PM PDT
by
Carolinamom
(Daily legal immigrant to FreeRepublic.com)
To: Mrs.Liberty; Law is not justice but process
And no wonder she is emailing a NY PR firm looking for the best way to spin this into a good opportunity for herself. We'll see her in the National Enquirer. And "Hustler" magazine.
To: Krodg
I feel for the black player. He was the only one on the team and the only one not forced to submit to the DNA testing. He must be feeling pretty ostracized about now...
818
posted on
04/21/2006 12:31:48 PM PDT
by
Raebie
To: connectthedots
And "Hustler" magazine. Skanky is as skanky does!
To: Crawdad
If the DA had an inside witness, he would have a more accurate timeline and no need for the illegal photo lineup. Plus, they would have indicted someone without strong alibis.
I think the Judge is talking out of his hat.
Yes. There are people that stupid. I have read a number of legal filings where I have wondered how the attorney graduated from law school and passed the bar examination.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 1,601-1,619 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson