Skip to comments.
Possible new planet is larger than Pluto-research (Reuters demonstrates their ignorance yet again)
Reuters ^
| 2/1/06
| Patricia Reaney
Posted on 02/01/2006 2:50:01 PM PST by Freedumb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: Freedumb
21
posted on
02/02/2006 9:40:04 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(In the long run, there is only the short run.)
To: Freedumb
I have additional objections to the way this is written:
- Needs the word "about" or error estimates
- Measured parameters are given, apparently, to one significant digit (3000km, 700, etc.) but the English conversion implies three significant digits
- The estimates orbital parameters should be supplied
- The whole "who is bigger" discussion is silly
22
posted on
02/03/2006 7:51:26 AM PST
by
JohnCliftn
(In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Good Will.)
23
posted on
09/01/2012 3:28:49 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
