Skip to comments.
The case for nuke cars—it's called 'hydrogen.' [Fuel cells make ZERO sense.]
Car And Driver magazine ^
| October, 2005 issue
| Patrick Bedard
Posted on 09/23/2005 2:19:38 PM PDT by newgeezer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
This seems to be a level-handed, hard-hitting analysis of the fallacy of running a car on hydrogen anytime soon.
1
posted on
09/23/2005 2:19:41 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
To: newgeezer
My truck is powered by nonsense and I have a limitless supply.
2
posted on
09/23/2005 2:22:36 PM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Ponce de Leon is coming here to look for the fountain of dumb. The DNC is his first stop.)
To: newgeezer
This is what we need:
3
posted on
09/23/2005 2:23:15 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(What part of ILLEGAL immigration do they not understand?)
To: newgeezer
Anthrop says it must be compressed to at least 4000 psi (Honda uses 5000 psi in the FCX; GM is trying for 10,000). 10,000 psi containers of compressed hydrogen. That sure will be a lot of fun during a high-speed accident or other container failure. You thought a ruptured gas tank or throwing a piston was bad...
To: newgeezer
This article jibes with one I read in American Spectator a couple of years ago. I've been down on hydrogen cars ever since. And with all I've read lately about the safety of new nuclear plants, I'm coming to the conclusion that that may be the way to go. I'm sure sick of being jerked around by the oil-producing countries, and hydrogen's economically unfeasible.
By the way, isn't it amazing that France gets 75% of its power from nuclear plants?
To: newgeezer
Well, maybe they will have a cold fusion cell as a power source. The quackery content alone would be enough to propel the vehicle to the greenpissers' headquarters and back.
6
posted on
09/23/2005 2:31:00 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: RightWhale
7
posted on
09/23/2005 2:31:50 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(19sep05 - I want at least 2 Saiga-12 shotguns. If you have leads, let me know)
To: RockinRight
Somebody needs to get in the Delorean and bring a few of them back from the future!
8
posted on
09/23/2005 2:31:56 PM PDT
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: GSlob
The quackery content alone Have you seen the new Chevy Mallard? The car seats two, the rest of the vehicle being occupied by the reactor, the cooling tower, and 5000 tons of concrete shielding.
9
posted on
09/23/2005 2:34:38 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(We in heep dip trubble)
To: newgeezer
Us techies have been saying this all along--"Hydrogen, hydrogen everywhere, but nary a drop to burn."
10
posted on
09/23/2005 2:34:47 PM PDT
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: newgeezer
What the hell is wrong with gasoline? Let's just close down the Sierra Club, NRDC and ACLU under RICO statutes, and then open up ANWR and the entire Western shale to unfettered production (f**k the caribou and salamanders, they can't drive). Investor's Business Daily estimates that the Western shale can produce enough oil to provide for America's entire demand for the next 400 years. Tree-huggers are the enemy. We voted in Republicans to shut those stupid pussies down. It's time to do that. Get the children (meaning Liberals) out of the office, it's time to let the adults solve America's energy needs.
To: newgeezer
The area of promise is entrained hydrogen generated catalytically or biologically. This is the only realistic hope.
If someone works it out, he will be rich beyond imagining!!!
12
posted on
09/23/2005 2:39:14 PM PDT
by
BillM
To: Question_Assumptions
10,000 psi containers of compressed hydrogen. That sure will be a lot of fun during a high-speed accident or other container failure. You thought a ruptured gas tank or throwing a piston was bad. From what I understand, the first hydrogen-cell-powered vehicles will be marketed by Ford. The first model has already been given a name..
The Ford Pinto II
To: newgeezer
Nuclear plants dedicated solely to electrolysis are the answer.
Seeing as the greenies will not allow the construction of any new nuclear facility dedicated to any purpose, we will just have to listen to them whine on about fantasy clean energy ideas until the lights literally go out and the economy runs to a stop.
That is the greenie goal for those who are unaware, all their talk of new sources and their continued political obstruction of any new sources is simply the masturbation they are using to deliver the masses to their goal.
True environmentalists believe the earth is their "mother" and any use of her resources it equivalent to a cancer in a biological entity. They intend to deliver humanity back to the stone age, and have no problem with the casualties.
I know these pigs well as I was once one of them.
14
posted on
09/23/2005 2:41:20 PM PDT
by
mmercier
To: newgeezer
15
posted on
09/23/2005 2:43:34 PM PDT
by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: newgeezer
This seems to be a level-handed, hard-hitting analysis of the fallacy of running a car on hydrogen anytime soon.
I would like to see a similar analysis using the Canadian anhydride's as the hydrogen source instead of the expensive water or natural gas which is useful for other purposes.
Hulkster
16
posted on
09/23/2005 2:44:28 PM PDT
by
IncredibleHulk
(For some, it is better to live in Hell ...)
To: Alex Murphy
Reminds me of the flying Chevy Malibu from Repo Man.
To: Conspiracy Guy
My truck is powered by nonsense and I have a limitless supply. I used to have one of those until I drove inside the Washington beltway. It accelerated to 200 mph and then the engine caught fire.
18
posted on
09/23/2005 2:49:32 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(We need a strict constructionist - not someone who plays shadow puppet theater with the Constitution)
To: newgeezer
19
posted on
09/23/2005 2:49:44 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
To: newgeezer
20
posted on
09/23/2005 2:50:35 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson