Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/24/2002 6:55:08 PM PDT by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: webber
If you really want to stick it to the dimowits vote for pubs.
2 posted on 10/24/2002 7:04:18 PM PDT by arkfreepdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
The liberals hate Libertarians MORE then Republicans why would they vote for the Libertarians? Better chance to get them to vote green.
3 posted on 10/24/2002 7:08:44 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
As much as I want to stick it to the RATS, I am very cautious when it comes to E-mails asking for money.
4 posted on 10/24/2002 7:11:28 PM PDT by P8riot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
No. It will split the Republican vote- allowing the Rat to take the election. Who's idea was this, anyway? Clintons?
5 posted on 10/24/2002 7:16:04 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
I don't think so...this is how we got Cleland to begin with. Check here:

In the race to replace Nunn, Democrat Cleland beat Millner with 49 percent of 2.2 million votes cast.

Millner received 48 percent. The difference may have been Libertarian Jack Cashin, who wound up receiving 81,652 votes.

Coverdell, a Republican, estimated three out of four Libertarian votes probably would have otherwise gone to Millner, providing the margin of victory.

In conceding the race, Millner also noted Cashin's impact.

Libertarian votes in 1992 sent then-U.S. Sen. Wyche Fowler, D-Ga., into a runoff with Coverdell when no candidate received a majority.

Coverdell took the runoff, and Democratic state lawmakers changed the law so that the winner of the U.S. Senate general election only needed 45 percent of the vote.


7 posted on 10/24/2002 7:34:22 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
Ron Crickenberger, LP National Political Director, is the one who is cooperating with the GOP to try and defeat the democrat challenger who has an edge over his republican opponent.

If votes can be taken from the demon-rat candidate by convincing some democrats who would not vote republican ever, to vote libertarian, it would give the GOP candidate a better chance at winning. It was used by the demon-rats in the past, so why not turn the tables on them and use their weapons on them? I have donated to Conservative Alerts several times in the past, and they send me updates on the issue I donated to them for. They are a reputable Organization.

I don't understand why you peope are so skeptical. This is one of the reasons GOP lose at the poles. They are afraid to try new things, while the demon-rats jump in eagerly. Maybe we don't deserve to have a Republic in the U.S. anymore.

if we're not willing to fight for our freedom and our Constitution, then we don't deserve to keep it.


"THE ONLY THING THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE TO LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTIES, IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING. GOOD INTENTIONS ARE THE STEPPING STONES TO HELL!

9 posted on 10/24/2002 8:01:16 PM PDT by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
better idea: at the last minute the libertarian should withdraw and endorse the Republican if the race is close ... the Libertarian did it in South Dakota ... classy and PROFREEDOM move!!!

Will the libertarian do it in Colorado or will he let Daschle stay in charge????

17 posted on 10/25/2002 11:25:43 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson