The poor/bad legal parts of the DOJ deal are not the fund, but that the DOJ (not the IRS) claiming in the “settlement” (1) the prohibition of ANY future IRS audits of DJT (2) and/or ANY family or business relation to DJT, and (3) whether for any past year or future year. That (3) is done by language that just says no audits, without any date specific or date limitation. The language of that part of the deal will definitely be legally challenged and likely not supported by the courts, as will the breadth of who is covered by that audit restriction beyond DJT himself. I think the bad legal language in the settlement might get the entire settlement thrown out.
“If the Fund were to be set up as a private organization it could hear the cases of those victimized . . . “
I suggested the very same thing on an earlier thread. Trump and his rich donors and supporters should set up the funds to assist the J6 victims weaponized by the Biden DOJ. If Trump gets billions in his settlement case with the IRS, that could fund it in itself.
I suggested that Rudy Giuliani be in charge of a commission that decides on the worthiness of the claims.